Cargando…

Effect of pressure controlled volume guaranteed ventilation during pulmonary resection in children

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the effect of pressure controlled volume guaranteed ventilation in children requiring one lung ventilation during pulmonary resection. Patients were randomly assigned to the lung protective ventilation combined with pressure controlled volume guaranteed group...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhu, Change, Zhang, Rufang, Yu, Shenghua, Zhang, Yuting, Wei, Rong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8831591/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35145122
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-05693-y
_version_ 1784648538979827712
author Zhu, Change
Zhang, Rufang
Yu, Shenghua
Zhang, Yuting
Wei, Rong
author_facet Zhu, Change
Zhang, Rufang
Yu, Shenghua
Zhang, Yuting
Wei, Rong
author_sort Zhu, Change
collection PubMed
description The purpose of the study was to evaluate the effect of pressure controlled volume guaranteed ventilation in children requiring one lung ventilation during pulmonary resection. Patients were randomly assigned to the lung protective ventilation combined with pressure controlled volume guaranteed group (PCV-VG group) or the lung protective ventilation combined with volume controlled ventilation group (VCV group). Both groups received tidal-volume ventilation of 8 ml kg(−1) body weight during two lung ventilation and 6 ml kg(−1) during OLV, with sustained 5 cmH(2)O positive end-expiratory pressure. Data collections were mainly performed at 10 min after induction of anaesthesia during TLV (T1), 5 min after OLV initiation (T2) and 5 min after complete CO2 insufflations (T3). In total, 63 patients were randomly assigned to the VCV (n = 31) and PCV-VG (n = 32) groups. The PCV-VG group exhibited lower PIP than the VCV group at T1 (16.8 ± 2.3 vs. 18.7 ± 2.7 cmH(2)O, P = 0.001), T2 (20.2 ± 2.7 vs. 22.4 ± 3.3 cmH(2)O, P = 0.001), and T3 (23.8 ± 3.2 vs. 26.36 ± 3.7 cmH(2)O, P = 0.01). Static compliance was higher in the PCV-VG group at T1, T2, and T3 (P = 0.01). After anaesthesia induction, lung aeration deteriorated, but with no immediate postoperative difference in both groups. Postoperative lung aeration improved and returned to normal from 2.5 h postextubation in both groups. PH was lower and PaCO(2) was higher in VCV group than PCV-VG group during one lung ventilation. No differences were observed in PaO(2)-FiO(2)-ratio at T2 and T3, the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications, intraoperative desaturation and the length of hospital stay. In paediatric patients, who underwent pulmonary resection requiring one lung ventilation, PCV-VG was superior to VCV in its ability to provide lower PIP, higher static compliance and lower PaCO(2) at one lung ventilation during pneumothorax. However, its beneficial effects on different pathological situations in pediatric patients need more investigation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8831591
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88315912022-02-14 Effect of pressure controlled volume guaranteed ventilation during pulmonary resection in children Zhu, Change Zhang, Rufang Yu, Shenghua Zhang, Yuting Wei, Rong Sci Rep Article The purpose of the study was to evaluate the effect of pressure controlled volume guaranteed ventilation in children requiring one lung ventilation during pulmonary resection. Patients were randomly assigned to the lung protective ventilation combined with pressure controlled volume guaranteed group (PCV-VG group) or the lung protective ventilation combined with volume controlled ventilation group (VCV group). Both groups received tidal-volume ventilation of 8 ml kg(−1) body weight during two lung ventilation and 6 ml kg(−1) during OLV, with sustained 5 cmH(2)O positive end-expiratory pressure. Data collections were mainly performed at 10 min after induction of anaesthesia during TLV (T1), 5 min after OLV initiation (T2) and 5 min after complete CO2 insufflations (T3). In total, 63 patients were randomly assigned to the VCV (n = 31) and PCV-VG (n = 32) groups. The PCV-VG group exhibited lower PIP than the VCV group at T1 (16.8 ± 2.3 vs. 18.7 ± 2.7 cmH(2)O, P = 0.001), T2 (20.2 ± 2.7 vs. 22.4 ± 3.3 cmH(2)O, P = 0.001), and T3 (23.8 ± 3.2 vs. 26.36 ± 3.7 cmH(2)O, P = 0.01). Static compliance was higher in the PCV-VG group at T1, T2, and T3 (P = 0.01). After anaesthesia induction, lung aeration deteriorated, but with no immediate postoperative difference in both groups. Postoperative lung aeration improved and returned to normal from 2.5 h postextubation in both groups. PH was lower and PaCO(2) was higher in VCV group than PCV-VG group during one lung ventilation. No differences were observed in PaO(2)-FiO(2)-ratio at T2 and T3, the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications, intraoperative desaturation and the length of hospital stay. In paediatric patients, who underwent pulmonary resection requiring one lung ventilation, PCV-VG was superior to VCV in its ability to provide lower PIP, higher static compliance and lower PaCO(2) at one lung ventilation during pneumothorax. However, its beneficial effects on different pathological situations in pediatric patients need more investigation. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-02-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8831591/ /pubmed/35145122 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-05693-y Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Zhu, Change
Zhang, Rufang
Yu, Shenghua
Zhang, Yuting
Wei, Rong
Effect of pressure controlled volume guaranteed ventilation during pulmonary resection in children
title Effect of pressure controlled volume guaranteed ventilation during pulmonary resection in children
title_full Effect of pressure controlled volume guaranteed ventilation during pulmonary resection in children
title_fullStr Effect of pressure controlled volume guaranteed ventilation during pulmonary resection in children
title_full_unstemmed Effect of pressure controlled volume guaranteed ventilation during pulmonary resection in children
title_short Effect of pressure controlled volume guaranteed ventilation during pulmonary resection in children
title_sort effect of pressure controlled volume guaranteed ventilation during pulmonary resection in children
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8831591/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35145122
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-05693-y
work_keys_str_mv AT zhuchange effectofpressurecontrolledvolumeguaranteedventilationduringpulmonaryresectioninchildren
AT zhangrufang effectofpressurecontrolledvolumeguaranteedventilationduringpulmonaryresectioninchildren
AT yushenghua effectofpressurecontrolledvolumeguaranteedventilationduringpulmonaryresectioninchildren
AT zhangyuting effectofpressurecontrolledvolumeguaranteedventilationduringpulmonaryresectioninchildren
AT weirong effectofpressurecontrolledvolumeguaranteedventilationduringpulmonaryresectioninchildren