Cargando…
A Comprehensive Evaluation of the Antibody-Verified Status of Eplets Listed in the HLA Epitope Registry
Matching strategies based on HLA eplets instead of HLA antigens in solid organ transplantation may not only increase the donor pool for highly sensitized patients, but also decrease the incidence of de novo donor-specific antibody formation. However, since not all eplets are equally capable of induc...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8831796/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35154076 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2021.800946 |
_version_ | 1784648582524043264 |
---|---|
author | Bezstarosti, Suzanne Bakker, Kim H. Kramer, Cynthia S. M. de Fijter, Johan W. Reinders, Marlies E. J. Mulder, Arend Claas, Frans H. J. Heidt, Sebastiaan |
author_facet | Bezstarosti, Suzanne Bakker, Kim H. Kramer, Cynthia S. M. de Fijter, Johan W. Reinders, Marlies E. J. Mulder, Arend Claas, Frans H. J. Heidt, Sebastiaan |
author_sort | Bezstarosti, Suzanne |
collection | PubMed |
description | Matching strategies based on HLA eplets instead of HLA antigens in solid organ transplantation may not only increase the donor pool for highly sensitized patients, but also decrease the incidence of de novo donor-specific antibody formation. However, since not all eplets are equally capable of inducing an immune response, antibody verification is needed to confirm their ability to be bound by antibodies, such that only clinically relevant eplets are considered. The HLA Epitope Registry has documented all theoretically defined HLA eplets along with their antibody verification status and has been the foundation for many clinical studies investigating eplet mismatch in transplantation. The verification methods for eplets in the Registry range from polyclonal sera from multi- and uni-parous women to murine and human monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), and antibodies purified by adsorption and elution from sera of HLA immunized individuals. The classification of antibody verification based on different methods for validation is problematic, since not all approaches represent the same level of evidence. In this study, we introduce a classification system to evaluate the level of evidence for the antibody-verified status of all eplets in the HLA Epitope Registry. We demonstrate that for a considerable number of eplets, the antibody-verified status is solely based on polyclonal serum reactivity of multiparous women or on reactivity of murine mAbs. Furthermore, we noted that a substantial proportion of patient sera analyses and human mAb data presented in the HLA Epitope Registry Database has never been published in a peer-reviewed journal. Therefore, we tested several unpublished human HLA-specific mAbs by luminex single antigen beads assay to analyze their HLA reactivity for eplet antibody verification. Although the majority of analyzed mAbs indeed verified their assigned eplets, this was not the case for a number of eplets. This comprehensive overview of evidence for antibody verification of eplets in the HLA Epitope Registry is instrumental for future investigations towards eplet immunogenicity and clinical studies considering antibody-verified eplet mismatch in transplantation and warrants further standardization of antibody verification using high quality data. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8831796 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88317962022-02-12 A Comprehensive Evaluation of the Antibody-Verified Status of Eplets Listed in the HLA Epitope Registry Bezstarosti, Suzanne Bakker, Kim H. Kramer, Cynthia S. M. de Fijter, Johan W. Reinders, Marlies E. J. Mulder, Arend Claas, Frans H. J. Heidt, Sebastiaan Front Immunol Immunology Matching strategies based on HLA eplets instead of HLA antigens in solid organ transplantation may not only increase the donor pool for highly sensitized patients, but also decrease the incidence of de novo donor-specific antibody formation. However, since not all eplets are equally capable of inducing an immune response, antibody verification is needed to confirm their ability to be bound by antibodies, such that only clinically relevant eplets are considered. The HLA Epitope Registry has documented all theoretically defined HLA eplets along with their antibody verification status and has been the foundation for many clinical studies investigating eplet mismatch in transplantation. The verification methods for eplets in the Registry range from polyclonal sera from multi- and uni-parous women to murine and human monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), and antibodies purified by adsorption and elution from sera of HLA immunized individuals. The classification of antibody verification based on different methods for validation is problematic, since not all approaches represent the same level of evidence. In this study, we introduce a classification system to evaluate the level of evidence for the antibody-verified status of all eplets in the HLA Epitope Registry. We demonstrate that for a considerable number of eplets, the antibody-verified status is solely based on polyclonal serum reactivity of multiparous women or on reactivity of murine mAbs. Furthermore, we noted that a substantial proportion of patient sera analyses and human mAb data presented in the HLA Epitope Registry Database has never been published in a peer-reviewed journal. Therefore, we tested several unpublished human HLA-specific mAbs by luminex single antigen beads assay to analyze their HLA reactivity for eplet antibody verification. Although the majority of analyzed mAbs indeed verified their assigned eplets, this was not the case for a number of eplets. This comprehensive overview of evidence for antibody verification of eplets in the HLA Epitope Registry is instrumental for future investigations towards eplet immunogenicity and clinical studies considering antibody-verified eplet mismatch in transplantation and warrants further standardization of antibody verification using high quality data. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-01-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8831796/ /pubmed/35154076 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2021.800946 Text en Copyright © 2022 Bezstarosti, Bakker, Kramer, de Fijter, Reinders, Mulder, Claas and Heidt https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Immunology Bezstarosti, Suzanne Bakker, Kim H. Kramer, Cynthia S. M. de Fijter, Johan W. Reinders, Marlies E. J. Mulder, Arend Claas, Frans H. J. Heidt, Sebastiaan A Comprehensive Evaluation of the Antibody-Verified Status of Eplets Listed in the HLA Epitope Registry |
title | A Comprehensive Evaluation of the Antibody-Verified Status of Eplets Listed in the HLA Epitope Registry |
title_full | A Comprehensive Evaluation of the Antibody-Verified Status of Eplets Listed in the HLA Epitope Registry |
title_fullStr | A Comprehensive Evaluation of the Antibody-Verified Status of Eplets Listed in the HLA Epitope Registry |
title_full_unstemmed | A Comprehensive Evaluation of the Antibody-Verified Status of Eplets Listed in the HLA Epitope Registry |
title_short | A Comprehensive Evaluation of the Antibody-Verified Status of Eplets Listed in the HLA Epitope Registry |
title_sort | comprehensive evaluation of the antibody-verified status of eplets listed in the hla epitope registry |
topic | Immunology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8831796/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35154076 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2021.800946 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bezstarostisuzanne acomprehensiveevaluationoftheantibodyverifiedstatusofepletslistedinthehlaepitoperegistry AT bakkerkimh acomprehensiveevaluationoftheantibodyverifiedstatusofepletslistedinthehlaepitoperegistry AT kramercynthiasm acomprehensiveevaluationoftheantibodyverifiedstatusofepletslistedinthehlaepitoperegistry AT defijterjohanw acomprehensiveevaluationoftheantibodyverifiedstatusofepletslistedinthehlaepitoperegistry AT reindersmarliesej acomprehensiveevaluationoftheantibodyverifiedstatusofepletslistedinthehlaepitoperegistry AT mulderarend acomprehensiveevaluationoftheantibodyverifiedstatusofepletslistedinthehlaepitoperegistry AT claasfranshj acomprehensiveevaluationoftheantibodyverifiedstatusofepletslistedinthehlaepitoperegistry AT heidtsebastiaan acomprehensiveevaluationoftheantibodyverifiedstatusofepletslistedinthehlaepitoperegistry AT bezstarostisuzanne comprehensiveevaluationoftheantibodyverifiedstatusofepletslistedinthehlaepitoperegistry AT bakkerkimh comprehensiveevaluationoftheantibodyverifiedstatusofepletslistedinthehlaepitoperegistry AT kramercynthiasm comprehensiveevaluationoftheantibodyverifiedstatusofepletslistedinthehlaepitoperegistry AT defijterjohanw comprehensiveevaluationoftheantibodyverifiedstatusofepletslistedinthehlaepitoperegistry AT reindersmarliesej comprehensiveevaluationoftheantibodyverifiedstatusofepletslistedinthehlaepitoperegistry AT mulderarend comprehensiveevaluationoftheantibodyverifiedstatusofepletslistedinthehlaepitoperegistry AT claasfranshj comprehensiveevaluationoftheantibodyverifiedstatusofepletslistedinthehlaepitoperegistry AT heidtsebastiaan comprehensiveevaluationoftheantibodyverifiedstatusofepletslistedinthehlaepitoperegistry |