Cargando…

The Interprocessual-Self Theory in Support of Human Neuroscience Studies

Rather than occurring abstractly (autonomously), ethical growth occurs in interpersonal relationships (IRs). It requires optimally functioning cognitive processes [attention, working memory (WM), episodic/autobiographical memory (AM), inhibition, flexibility, among others], emotional processes (phys...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Luis, Elkin O., Akrivou, Kleio, Bermejo-Martins, Elena, Scalzo, Germán, Orón, José Víctor
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8832125/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35153881
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.686928
_version_ 1784648660110278656
author Luis, Elkin O.
Akrivou, Kleio
Bermejo-Martins, Elena
Scalzo, Germán
Orón, José Víctor
author_facet Luis, Elkin O.
Akrivou, Kleio
Bermejo-Martins, Elena
Scalzo, Germán
Orón, José Víctor
author_sort Luis, Elkin O.
collection PubMed
description Rather than occurring abstractly (autonomously), ethical growth occurs in interpersonal relationships (IRs). It requires optimally functioning cognitive processes [attention, working memory (WM), episodic/autobiographical memory (AM), inhibition, flexibility, among others], emotional processes (physical contact, motivation, and empathy), processes surrounding ethical, intimacy, and identity issues, and other psychological processes (self-knowledge, integration, and the capacity for agency). Without intending to be reductionist, we believe that these aspects are essential for optimally engaging in IRs and for the personal constitution. While they are all integrated into our daily life, in research and academic work, it is hard to see how they are integrated. Thus, we need better theoretical frameworks for studying them. That study and integration thereof are undertaken differently depending on different views of what it means to live as a human being. We rely on neuroscientific data to support the chosen theory to offer knowledge to understand human beings and interpersonal relational growth. We should of course note that to describe what makes up the uniqueness of being, acting, and growing as a human person involves something much more profound which requires too, a methodology that opens the way for a theory of the person that responds to the concerns of philosophy and philosophical anthropology from many disciplines and methods (Orón Semper, 2015; Polo, 2015), but this is outside the scope of this study. With these in mind, this article aims to introduce a new explanatory framework, called the Interprocessual-self (IPS), for the neuroscientific findings that allow for a holistic consideration of the previously mentioned processes. Contributing to the knowledge of personal growth and avoiding a reductionist view, we first offer a general description of the research that supports the interrelation between personal virtue in IRs and relevant cognitive, emotional, and ethic-moral processes. This reveals how relationships allow people to relate ethically and grow as persons. We include conceptualizations and descriptions of their neural bases. Secondly, with the IPS model, we explore neuroscientific findings regarding self-knowledge, integration, and agency, all psychological processes that stimulate inner exploration of the self concerning the other. We find that these fundamental conditions can be understood from IPS theory. Finally, we explore situations that involve the integration of two levels, namely the interpersonal one and the social contexts of relationships.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8832125
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88321252022-02-12 The Interprocessual-Self Theory in Support of Human Neuroscience Studies Luis, Elkin O. Akrivou, Kleio Bermejo-Martins, Elena Scalzo, Germán Orón, José Víctor Front Psychol Psychology Rather than occurring abstractly (autonomously), ethical growth occurs in interpersonal relationships (IRs). It requires optimally functioning cognitive processes [attention, working memory (WM), episodic/autobiographical memory (AM), inhibition, flexibility, among others], emotional processes (physical contact, motivation, and empathy), processes surrounding ethical, intimacy, and identity issues, and other psychological processes (self-knowledge, integration, and the capacity for agency). Without intending to be reductionist, we believe that these aspects are essential for optimally engaging in IRs and for the personal constitution. While they are all integrated into our daily life, in research and academic work, it is hard to see how they are integrated. Thus, we need better theoretical frameworks for studying them. That study and integration thereof are undertaken differently depending on different views of what it means to live as a human being. We rely on neuroscientific data to support the chosen theory to offer knowledge to understand human beings and interpersonal relational growth. We should of course note that to describe what makes up the uniqueness of being, acting, and growing as a human person involves something much more profound which requires too, a methodology that opens the way for a theory of the person that responds to the concerns of philosophy and philosophical anthropology from many disciplines and methods (Orón Semper, 2015; Polo, 2015), but this is outside the scope of this study. With these in mind, this article aims to introduce a new explanatory framework, called the Interprocessual-self (IPS), for the neuroscientific findings that allow for a holistic consideration of the previously mentioned processes. Contributing to the knowledge of personal growth and avoiding a reductionist view, we first offer a general description of the research that supports the interrelation between personal virtue in IRs and relevant cognitive, emotional, and ethic-moral processes. This reveals how relationships allow people to relate ethically and grow as persons. We include conceptualizations and descriptions of their neural bases. Secondly, with the IPS model, we explore neuroscientific findings regarding self-knowledge, integration, and agency, all psychological processes that stimulate inner exploration of the self concerning the other. We find that these fundamental conditions can be understood from IPS theory. Finally, we explore situations that involve the integration of two levels, namely the interpersonal one and the social contexts of relationships. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-01-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8832125/ /pubmed/35153881 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.686928 Text en Copyright © 2022 Luis, Akrivou, Bermejo-Martins, Scalzo and Orón. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Luis, Elkin O.
Akrivou, Kleio
Bermejo-Martins, Elena
Scalzo, Germán
Orón, José Víctor
The Interprocessual-Self Theory in Support of Human Neuroscience Studies
title The Interprocessual-Self Theory in Support of Human Neuroscience Studies
title_full The Interprocessual-Self Theory in Support of Human Neuroscience Studies
title_fullStr The Interprocessual-Self Theory in Support of Human Neuroscience Studies
title_full_unstemmed The Interprocessual-Self Theory in Support of Human Neuroscience Studies
title_short The Interprocessual-Self Theory in Support of Human Neuroscience Studies
title_sort interprocessual-self theory in support of human neuroscience studies
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8832125/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35153881
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.686928
work_keys_str_mv AT luiselkino theinterprocessualselftheoryinsupportofhumanneurosciencestudies
AT akrivoukleio theinterprocessualselftheoryinsupportofhumanneurosciencestudies
AT bermejomartinselena theinterprocessualselftheoryinsupportofhumanneurosciencestudies
AT scalzogerman theinterprocessualselftheoryinsupportofhumanneurosciencestudies
AT oronjosevictor theinterprocessualselftheoryinsupportofhumanneurosciencestudies
AT luiselkino interprocessualselftheoryinsupportofhumanneurosciencestudies
AT akrivoukleio interprocessualselftheoryinsupportofhumanneurosciencestudies
AT bermejomartinselena interprocessualselftheoryinsupportofhumanneurosciencestudies
AT scalzogerman interprocessualselftheoryinsupportofhumanneurosciencestudies
AT oronjosevictor interprocessualselftheoryinsupportofhumanneurosciencestudies