Cargando…
Technology-Enabled, Evidence-Driven, and Patient-Centered: The Way Forward for Regulating Software as a Medical Device
Artificial intelligence (AI) is a broad discipline that aims to understand and design systems that display properties of intelligence. Machine learning (ML) is a subset of AI that describes how algorithms and models can assist computer systems in progressively improving their performance. In health...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
JMIR Publications
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8832257/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35084352 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/34038 |
_version_ | 1784648680928706560 |
---|---|
author | Carolan, Jane Elizabeth McGonigle, John Dennis, Andrea Lorgelly, Paula Banerjee, Amitava |
author_facet | Carolan, Jane Elizabeth McGonigle, John Dennis, Andrea Lorgelly, Paula Banerjee, Amitava |
author_sort | Carolan, Jane Elizabeth |
collection | PubMed |
description | Artificial intelligence (AI) is a broad discipline that aims to understand and design systems that display properties of intelligence. Machine learning (ML) is a subset of AI that describes how algorithms and models can assist computer systems in progressively improving their performance. In health care, an increasingly common application of AI/ML is software as a medical device (SaMD), which has the intention to diagnose, treat, cure, mitigate, or prevent disease. AI/ML includes either “locked” or “continuous learning” algorithms. Locked algorithms consistently provide the same output for a particular input. Conversely, continuous learning algorithms, in their infancy in terms of SaMD, modify in real-time based on incoming real-world data, without controlled software version releases. This continuous learning has the potential to better handle local population characteristics, but with the risk of reinforcing existing structural biases. Continuous learning algorithms pose the greatest regulatory complexity, requiring seemingly continuous oversight in the form of special controls to ensure ongoing safety and effectiveness. We describe the challenges of continuous learning algorithms, then highlight the new evidence standards and frameworks under development, and discuss the need for stakeholder engagement. The paper concludes with 2 key steps that regulators need to address in order to optimize and realize the benefits of SaMD: first, international standards and guiding principles addressing the uniqueness of SaMD with a continuous learning algorithm are required and second, throughout the product life cycle and appropriate to the SaMD risk classification, there needs to be continuous communication between regulators, developers, and SaMD end users to ensure vigilance and an accurate understanding of the technology. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8832257 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | JMIR Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88322572022-03-07 Technology-Enabled, Evidence-Driven, and Patient-Centered: The Way Forward for Regulating Software as a Medical Device Carolan, Jane Elizabeth McGonigle, John Dennis, Andrea Lorgelly, Paula Banerjee, Amitava JMIR Med Inform Viewpoint Artificial intelligence (AI) is a broad discipline that aims to understand and design systems that display properties of intelligence. Machine learning (ML) is a subset of AI that describes how algorithms and models can assist computer systems in progressively improving their performance. In health care, an increasingly common application of AI/ML is software as a medical device (SaMD), which has the intention to diagnose, treat, cure, mitigate, or prevent disease. AI/ML includes either “locked” or “continuous learning” algorithms. Locked algorithms consistently provide the same output for a particular input. Conversely, continuous learning algorithms, in their infancy in terms of SaMD, modify in real-time based on incoming real-world data, without controlled software version releases. This continuous learning has the potential to better handle local population characteristics, but with the risk of reinforcing existing structural biases. Continuous learning algorithms pose the greatest regulatory complexity, requiring seemingly continuous oversight in the form of special controls to ensure ongoing safety and effectiveness. We describe the challenges of continuous learning algorithms, then highlight the new evidence standards and frameworks under development, and discuss the need for stakeholder engagement. The paper concludes with 2 key steps that regulators need to address in order to optimize and realize the benefits of SaMD: first, international standards and guiding principles addressing the uniqueness of SaMD with a continuous learning algorithm are required and second, throughout the product life cycle and appropriate to the SaMD risk classification, there needs to be continuous communication between regulators, developers, and SaMD end users to ensure vigilance and an accurate understanding of the technology. JMIR Publications 2022-01-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8832257/ /pubmed/35084352 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/34038 Text en ©Jane Elizabeth Carolan, John McGonigle, Andrea Dennis, Paula Lorgelly, Amitava Banerjee. Originally published in JMIR Medical Informatics (https://medinform.jmir.org), 27.01.2022. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Medical Informatics, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://medinform.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included. |
spellingShingle | Viewpoint Carolan, Jane Elizabeth McGonigle, John Dennis, Andrea Lorgelly, Paula Banerjee, Amitava Technology-Enabled, Evidence-Driven, and Patient-Centered: The Way Forward for Regulating Software as a Medical Device |
title | Technology-Enabled, Evidence-Driven, and Patient-Centered: The Way Forward for Regulating Software as a Medical Device |
title_full | Technology-Enabled, Evidence-Driven, and Patient-Centered: The Way Forward for Regulating Software as a Medical Device |
title_fullStr | Technology-Enabled, Evidence-Driven, and Patient-Centered: The Way Forward for Regulating Software as a Medical Device |
title_full_unstemmed | Technology-Enabled, Evidence-Driven, and Patient-Centered: The Way Forward for Regulating Software as a Medical Device |
title_short | Technology-Enabled, Evidence-Driven, and Patient-Centered: The Way Forward for Regulating Software as a Medical Device |
title_sort | technology-enabled, evidence-driven, and patient-centered: the way forward for regulating software as a medical device |
topic | Viewpoint |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8832257/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35084352 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/34038 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT carolanjaneelizabeth technologyenabledevidencedrivenandpatientcenteredthewayforwardforregulatingsoftwareasamedicaldevice AT mcgoniglejohn technologyenabledevidencedrivenandpatientcenteredthewayforwardforregulatingsoftwareasamedicaldevice AT dennisandrea technologyenabledevidencedrivenandpatientcenteredthewayforwardforregulatingsoftwareasamedicaldevice AT lorgellypaula technologyenabledevidencedrivenandpatientcenteredthewayforwardforregulatingsoftwareasamedicaldevice AT banerjeeamitava technologyenabledevidencedrivenandpatientcenteredthewayforwardforregulatingsoftwareasamedicaldevice |