Cargando…

Rituximab Concentration Varies in Patients With Different Lymphoma Subtypes and Correlates With Clinical Outcome

Individual variations in concentrations of rituximab in different B cell non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma subtypes and their relevance to efficacy were still unclear. From 2016 to 2021, a prospective clinical trial was conducted, and 510 samples with 6 uncommon subtypes of B-cell lymphoma were enrolled to exa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Shu, Wang, Zhao, Chen, Rongxin, Wang, Xueding, Fang, Xiaojie, Chen, Zhuojia, Guan, Shaoxing, Liu, Tao, Lin, Tongyu, Huang, Min, Huang, He
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8832337/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35153779
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2022.788824
_version_ 1784648698163101696
author Liu, Shu
Wang, Zhao
Chen, Rongxin
Wang, Xueding
Fang, Xiaojie
Chen, Zhuojia
Guan, Shaoxing
Liu, Tao
Lin, Tongyu
Huang, Min
Huang, He
author_facet Liu, Shu
Wang, Zhao
Chen, Rongxin
Wang, Xueding
Fang, Xiaojie
Chen, Zhuojia
Guan, Shaoxing
Liu, Tao
Lin, Tongyu
Huang, Min
Huang, He
author_sort Liu, Shu
collection PubMed
description Individual variations in concentrations of rituximab in different B cell non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma subtypes and their relevance to efficacy were still unclear. From 2016 to 2021, a prospective clinical trial was conducted, and 510 samples with 6 uncommon subtypes of B-cell lymphoma were enrolled to examine the pharmacokinetic behaviour of rituximab and its impact on clinical outcomes, including complete response (CR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Considerable variability was observed in the rituximab trough concentration in the first cycle (C(1-trough), 1.16–55.52 μg/ml) in patients with different lymphoma subtypes. Patients with “double-hit” lymphoma (4.01 ± 0.77 μg/ml) or mantle cell lymphoma (MCL; 15.65 ± 16.45 μg/ml) had much lower C(1-trough) and worse outcomes. Great individual variation in the C(1-trough) existed among patients with mucosa-associated lymphoma (MALT), and the high C(1-trough) observed in patients treated with the RB regimen was associated with a better response than was obtained with R-CHOP (38.41 ± 14.13 μg/ml vs 15.49 ± 8.80 μg/ml, p = 0.0029). Despite the high aggressiveness of the cancer, Burkitt lymphoma patients receiving intensive chemotherapy had the highest C(1-trough) (28.85 ± 9.35 μg/ml) and maintained long-term PFS. The C(1-trough) in patients with mixed, unclassifiable B-cell lymphoma was close to 20 μg/ml, and these patients had acceptable outcomes. Overall, a low rituximab C(1-trough) was associated with adverse consequences, including persistent progression, early recurrence and a short OS, however, some high-risk factors appeared to be balanced by the presence of a high C(1-trough). Basal levels of circulating CD19(+) lymphocytes differed between and within patients with diverse lymphoma subtypes and were negatively correlated with C(1-trough). Therefore, the traditional doses of rituximab are inadequate for patients with “double-hit” lymphoma and MCL. Increasing the initial rituximab dose according to the disease, high-risk factors and even the baseline CD19(+) lymphocyte count will be new methods to optimize therapeutic regimens for patients with different lymphoma subtypes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8832337
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88323372022-02-12 Rituximab Concentration Varies in Patients With Different Lymphoma Subtypes and Correlates With Clinical Outcome Liu, Shu Wang, Zhao Chen, Rongxin Wang, Xueding Fang, Xiaojie Chen, Zhuojia Guan, Shaoxing Liu, Tao Lin, Tongyu Huang, Min Huang, He Front Pharmacol Pharmacology Individual variations in concentrations of rituximab in different B cell non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma subtypes and their relevance to efficacy were still unclear. From 2016 to 2021, a prospective clinical trial was conducted, and 510 samples with 6 uncommon subtypes of B-cell lymphoma were enrolled to examine the pharmacokinetic behaviour of rituximab and its impact on clinical outcomes, including complete response (CR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Considerable variability was observed in the rituximab trough concentration in the first cycle (C(1-trough), 1.16–55.52 μg/ml) in patients with different lymphoma subtypes. Patients with “double-hit” lymphoma (4.01 ± 0.77 μg/ml) or mantle cell lymphoma (MCL; 15.65 ± 16.45 μg/ml) had much lower C(1-trough) and worse outcomes. Great individual variation in the C(1-trough) existed among patients with mucosa-associated lymphoma (MALT), and the high C(1-trough) observed in patients treated with the RB regimen was associated with a better response than was obtained with R-CHOP (38.41 ± 14.13 μg/ml vs 15.49 ± 8.80 μg/ml, p = 0.0029). Despite the high aggressiveness of the cancer, Burkitt lymphoma patients receiving intensive chemotherapy had the highest C(1-trough) (28.85 ± 9.35 μg/ml) and maintained long-term PFS. The C(1-trough) in patients with mixed, unclassifiable B-cell lymphoma was close to 20 μg/ml, and these patients had acceptable outcomes. Overall, a low rituximab C(1-trough) was associated with adverse consequences, including persistent progression, early recurrence and a short OS, however, some high-risk factors appeared to be balanced by the presence of a high C(1-trough). Basal levels of circulating CD19(+) lymphocytes differed between and within patients with diverse lymphoma subtypes and were negatively correlated with C(1-trough). Therefore, the traditional doses of rituximab are inadequate for patients with “double-hit” lymphoma and MCL. Increasing the initial rituximab dose according to the disease, high-risk factors and even the baseline CD19(+) lymphocyte count will be new methods to optimize therapeutic regimens for patients with different lymphoma subtypes. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-01-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8832337/ /pubmed/35153779 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2022.788824 Text en Copyright © 2022 Liu, Wang, Chen, Wang, Fang, Chen, Guan, Liu, Lin, Huang and Huang. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Pharmacology
Liu, Shu
Wang, Zhao
Chen, Rongxin
Wang, Xueding
Fang, Xiaojie
Chen, Zhuojia
Guan, Shaoxing
Liu, Tao
Lin, Tongyu
Huang, Min
Huang, He
Rituximab Concentration Varies in Patients With Different Lymphoma Subtypes and Correlates With Clinical Outcome
title Rituximab Concentration Varies in Patients With Different Lymphoma Subtypes and Correlates With Clinical Outcome
title_full Rituximab Concentration Varies in Patients With Different Lymphoma Subtypes and Correlates With Clinical Outcome
title_fullStr Rituximab Concentration Varies in Patients With Different Lymphoma Subtypes and Correlates With Clinical Outcome
title_full_unstemmed Rituximab Concentration Varies in Patients With Different Lymphoma Subtypes and Correlates With Clinical Outcome
title_short Rituximab Concentration Varies in Patients With Different Lymphoma Subtypes and Correlates With Clinical Outcome
title_sort rituximab concentration varies in patients with different lymphoma subtypes and correlates with clinical outcome
topic Pharmacology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8832337/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35153779
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2022.788824
work_keys_str_mv AT liushu rituximabconcentrationvariesinpatientswithdifferentlymphomasubtypesandcorrelateswithclinicaloutcome
AT wangzhao rituximabconcentrationvariesinpatientswithdifferentlymphomasubtypesandcorrelateswithclinicaloutcome
AT chenrongxin rituximabconcentrationvariesinpatientswithdifferentlymphomasubtypesandcorrelateswithclinicaloutcome
AT wangxueding rituximabconcentrationvariesinpatientswithdifferentlymphomasubtypesandcorrelateswithclinicaloutcome
AT fangxiaojie rituximabconcentrationvariesinpatientswithdifferentlymphomasubtypesandcorrelateswithclinicaloutcome
AT chenzhuojia rituximabconcentrationvariesinpatientswithdifferentlymphomasubtypesandcorrelateswithclinicaloutcome
AT guanshaoxing rituximabconcentrationvariesinpatientswithdifferentlymphomasubtypesandcorrelateswithclinicaloutcome
AT liutao rituximabconcentrationvariesinpatientswithdifferentlymphomasubtypesandcorrelateswithclinicaloutcome
AT lintongyu rituximabconcentrationvariesinpatientswithdifferentlymphomasubtypesandcorrelateswithclinicaloutcome
AT huangmin rituximabconcentrationvariesinpatientswithdifferentlymphomasubtypesandcorrelateswithclinicaloutcome
AT huanghe rituximabconcentrationvariesinpatientswithdifferentlymphomasubtypesandcorrelateswithclinicaloutcome