Cargando…
The reproducibility debate is an opportunity, not a crisis
There are many factors that contribute to the reproducibility and replicability of scientific research. There is a need to understand the research ecosystem, and improvements will require combined efforts across all parts of this ecosystem. National structures can play an important role in coordinat...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8832688/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35144667 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-022-05942-3 |
_version_ | 1784648775548010496 |
---|---|
author | Munafò, Marcus R. Chambers, Chris Collins, Alexandra Fortunato, Laura Macleod, Malcolm |
author_facet | Munafò, Marcus R. Chambers, Chris Collins, Alexandra Fortunato, Laura Macleod, Malcolm |
author_sort | Munafò, Marcus R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | There are many factors that contribute to the reproducibility and replicability of scientific research. There is a need to understand the research ecosystem, and improvements will require combined efforts across all parts of this ecosystem. National structures can play an important role in coordinating these efforts, working collaboratively with researchers, institutions, funders, publishers, learned societies and other sectoral organisations, and providing a monitoring and reporting function. Whilst many new ways of working and emerging innovations hold a great deal of promise, it will be important to invest in meta-research activity to ensure that these approaches are evidence based, work as intended, and do not have unintended consequences. Addressing reproducibility will require working collaboratively across the research ecosystem to share best practice and to make the most effective use of resources. The UK Reproducibility Network (UKRN) brings together Local Networks of researchers, Institutions, and External Stakeholders (funders, publishers, learned societies and other sectoral organisations), to coordinate action on reproducibility and work to ensure the UK retains its place as a centre for world-leading research. This activity is coordinated by the UKRN Steering Group. We consider this structure as valuable, bringing together a range of voices at a range of levels to support the combined efforts required to enact change. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8832688 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88326882022-02-11 The reproducibility debate is an opportunity, not a crisis Munafò, Marcus R. Chambers, Chris Collins, Alexandra Fortunato, Laura Macleod, Malcolm BMC Res Notes Commentary There are many factors that contribute to the reproducibility and replicability of scientific research. There is a need to understand the research ecosystem, and improvements will require combined efforts across all parts of this ecosystem. National structures can play an important role in coordinating these efforts, working collaboratively with researchers, institutions, funders, publishers, learned societies and other sectoral organisations, and providing a monitoring and reporting function. Whilst many new ways of working and emerging innovations hold a great deal of promise, it will be important to invest in meta-research activity to ensure that these approaches are evidence based, work as intended, and do not have unintended consequences. Addressing reproducibility will require working collaboratively across the research ecosystem to share best practice and to make the most effective use of resources. The UK Reproducibility Network (UKRN) brings together Local Networks of researchers, Institutions, and External Stakeholders (funders, publishers, learned societies and other sectoral organisations), to coordinate action on reproducibility and work to ensure the UK retains its place as a centre for world-leading research. This activity is coordinated by the UKRN Steering Group. We consider this structure as valuable, bringing together a range of voices at a range of levels to support the combined efforts required to enact change. BioMed Central 2022-02-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8832688/ /pubmed/35144667 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-022-05942-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Commentary Munafò, Marcus R. Chambers, Chris Collins, Alexandra Fortunato, Laura Macleod, Malcolm The reproducibility debate is an opportunity, not a crisis |
title | The reproducibility debate is an opportunity, not a crisis |
title_full | The reproducibility debate is an opportunity, not a crisis |
title_fullStr | The reproducibility debate is an opportunity, not a crisis |
title_full_unstemmed | The reproducibility debate is an opportunity, not a crisis |
title_short | The reproducibility debate is an opportunity, not a crisis |
title_sort | reproducibility debate is an opportunity, not a crisis |
topic | Commentary |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8832688/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35144667 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-022-05942-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT munafomarcusr thereproducibilitydebateisanopportunitynotacrisis AT chamberschris thereproducibilitydebateisanopportunitynotacrisis AT collinsalexandra thereproducibilitydebateisanopportunitynotacrisis AT fortunatolaura thereproducibilitydebateisanopportunitynotacrisis AT macleodmalcolm thereproducibilitydebateisanopportunitynotacrisis AT munafomarcusr reproducibilitydebateisanopportunitynotacrisis AT chamberschris reproducibilitydebateisanopportunitynotacrisis AT collinsalexandra reproducibilitydebateisanopportunitynotacrisis AT fortunatolaura reproducibilitydebateisanopportunitynotacrisis AT macleodmalcolm reproducibilitydebateisanopportunitynotacrisis |