Cargando…

Insects as alternative feed for ruminants: comparison of protein evaluation methods

BACKGROUND: The high dependence of intensive ruminant production on soybean meal and the environmental impact of this crop encourage the search for alternative protein-rich feeds. The use of insects seems promising, but the extent of their ruminal protein degradation is largely unknown. This paramet...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Toral, Pablo G., Hervás, Gonzalo, González-Rosales, Mariana Gabriela, Mendoza, Alejandro G., Robles-Jiménez, Lizbeth E., Frutos, Pilar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8832790/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35144685
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40104-021-00671-2
_version_ 1784648792558010368
author Toral, Pablo G.
Hervás, Gonzalo
González-Rosales, Mariana Gabriela
Mendoza, Alejandro G.
Robles-Jiménez, Lizbeth E.
Frutos, Pilar
author_facet Toral, Pablo G.
Hervás, Gonzalo
González-Rosales, Mariana Gabriela
Mendoza, Alejandro G.
Robles-Jiménez, Lizbeth E.
Frutos, Pilar
author_sort Toral, Pablo G.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The high dependence of intensive ruminant production on soybean meal and the environmental impact of this crop encourage the search for alternative protein-rich feeds. The use of insects seems promising, but the extent of their ruminal protein degradation is largely unknown. This parameter has major influence not only on N utilization efficiency but also on the environmental burden of ruminant farming. In addition, although assessing ruminal N degradation represents a key first step to examine the potential of new feeds, it is a challenging task due to the lack of a reference method. This study was conducted to investigate the potential of 4 insects (Tenebrio molitor, Zophobas morio, Alphitobius diaperinus and Acheta domesticus) as alternative protein sources for ruminants, using 3 methodologies: 1) a regression technique based on the in vitro relationship between gas production and ammonia-N concentration; 2) a conventional in vitro technique of batch cultures of ruminal microorganisms, based on filtering the incubation residue through sintered glass crucibles; and 3) the in situ nylon bag technique. The in vitro intestinal digestibility of the non-degraded protein in the rumen was also determined. Soybean meal was used as a reference feedstuff. RESULTS: Comparison of evaluation methods (regression, in vitro and in situ) did not allow to reliably select a single value of ruminal N degradation for the studied substrates, but all techniques seem to establish a similar ranking, with good correlations between methods, particularly between regression and in situ results. Regardless of the methodology, nitrogen from the 4 insects (with contents ranging from 81 to 112 g/kg of dry matter) did not show high ruminal degradation (41–76%), this value being always lower than that of soybean meal. Furthermore, the in vitro intestinal digestibility of non-degraded N was relatively high in all feeds (≥ 64%). CONCLUSION: Overall, these results support the potential of the 4 studied insects as alternative feedstuffs for ruminants. Among them, T. molitor showed the lowest and greatest values of ruminal N degradation and intestinal digestibility, respectively, which would place it as probably the best option to replace dietary soybean meal and increase the sustainability of ruminant feeding.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8832790
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88327902022-02-15 Insects as alternative feed for ruminants: comparison of protein evaluation methods Toral, Pablo G. Hervás, Gonzalo González-Rosales, Mariana Gabriela Mendoza, Alejandro G. Robles-Jiménez, Lizbeth E. Frutos, Pilar J Anim Sci Biotechnol Research BACKGROUND: The high dependence of intensive ruminant production on soybean meal and the environmental impact of this crop encourage the search for alternative protein-rich feeds. The use of insects seems promising, but the extent of their ruminal protein degradation is largely unknown. This parameter has major influence not only on N utilization efficiency but also on the environmental burden of ruminant farming. In addition, although assessing ruminal N degradation represents a key first step to examine the potential of new feeds, it is a challenging task due to the lack of a reference method. This study was conducted to investigate the potential of 4 insects (Tenebrio molitor, Zophobas morio, Alphitobius diaperinus and Acheta domesticus) as alternative protein sources for ruminants, using 3 methodologies: 1) a regression technique based on the in vitro relationship between gas production and ammonia-N concentration; 2) a conventional in vitro technique of batch cultures of ruminal microorganisms, based on filtering the incubation residue through sintered glass crucibles; and 3) the in situ nylon bag technique. The in vitro intestinal digestibility of the non-degraded protein in the rumen was also determined. Soybean meal was used as a reference feedstuff. RESULTS: Comparison of evaluation methods (regression, in vitro and in situ) did not allow to reliably select a single value of ruminal N degradation for the studied substrates, but all techniques seem to establish a similar ranking, with good correlations between methods, particularly between regression and in situ results. Regardless of the methodology, nitrogen from the 4 insects (with contents ranging from 81 to 112 g/kg of dry matter) did not show high ruminal degradation (41–76%), this value being always lower than that of soybean meal. Furthermore, the in vitro intestinal digestibility of non-degraded N was relatively high in all feeds (≥ 64%). CONCLUSION: Overall, these results support the potential of the 4 studied insects as alternative feedstuffs for ruminants. Among them, T. molitor showed the lowest and greatest values of ruminal N degradation and intestinal digestibility, respectively, which would place it as probably the best option to replace dietary soybean meal and increase the sustainability of ruminant feeding. BioMed Central 2022-02-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8832790/ /pubmed/35144685 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40104-021-00671-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Toral, Pablo G.
Hervás, Gonzalo
González-Rosales, Mariana Gabriela
Mendoza, Alejandro G.
Robles-Jiménez, Lizbeth E.
Frutos, Pilar
Insects as alternative feed for ruminants: comparison of protein evaluation methods
title Insects as alternative feed for ruminants: comparison of protein evaluation methods
title_full Insects as alternative feed for ruminants: comparison of protein evaluation methods
title_fullStr Insects as alternative feed for ruminants: comparison of protein evaluation methods
title_full_unstemmed Insects as alternative feed for ruminants: comparison of protein evaluation methods
title_short Insects as alternative feed for ruminants: comparison of protein evaluation methods
title_sort insects as alternative feed for ruminants: comparison of protein evaluation methods
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8832790/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35144685
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40104-021-00671-2
work_keys_str_mv AT toralpablog insectsasalternativefeedforruminantscomparisonofproteinevaluationmethods
AT hervasgonzalo insectsasalternativefeedforruminantscomparisonofproteinevaluationmethods
AT gonzalezrosalesmarianagabriela insectsasalternativefeedforruminantscomparisonofproteinevaluationmethods
AT mendozaalejandrog insectsasalternativefeedforruminantscomparisonofproteinevaluationmethods
AT roblesjimenezlizbethe insectsasalternativefeedforruminantscomparisonofproteinevaluationmethods
AT frutospilar insectsasalternativefeedforruminantscomparisonofproteinevaluationmethods