Cargando…
Differences in image density adjustment parameters on the image matching accuracy of a floor‐mounted kV X‐ray image‐guided radiation therapy system
This study aimed to investigate the effect of two different image density adjustment parameters on the results of image matching at six degrees of freedom using radiographic images generated by the ExacTrac X‐ray system in brain stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). This study comprised 32 patients who u...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8833277/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34931431 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13505 |
_version_ | 1784648896284196864 |
---|---|
author | Sakuragawa, Kanako Sasaki, Motoharu Kamomae, Takeshi Yokoishi, Michihiro Kasai, Ryosuke Kajino, Akimi Ikushima, Hitoshi |
author_facet | Sakuragawa, Kanako Sasaki, Motoharu Kamomae, Takeshi Yokoishi, Michihiro Kasai, Ryosuke Kajino, Akimi Ikushima, Hitoshi |
author_sort | Sakuragawa, Kanako |
collection | PubMed |
description | This study aimed to investigate the effect of two different image density adjustment parameters on the results of image matching at six degrees of freedom using radiographic images generated by the ExacTrac X‐ray system in brain stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). This study comprised 32 patients who underwent brain SRS at our hospital from January 2020 to December 2020. In this study, (1) the default parameter (an image density parameter between “tissue” and “bone”) was an image density parameter for digitally reconstructed radiograph (DRR) generation used at many facilities, and (2) the bone parameter was the steepest contrast parameter used at our hospital. Of the 32 patients, 24 (75%) had a couch angle of 0.5 mm or more in the translational direction or 0.5° or more in the rotational direction, and 10 (31%) had a couch angle of 1.0 mm or more in the translational direction or 1.0° or more in the rotational direction. Among the 131 cases of all couch angles, 46 (35%) cases had a translational direction of 0.5 mm or more or a rotational direction of 0.5° or more, and 15 (11%) had a translational direction of 1.0 mm or more or a rotational direction of 1.0° or more. The results of this study indicate the usefulness of using appropriate DRR parameters for each case, rather than using the default settings. The use of appropriate DRR parameters can lead to accurate position matching results, leading to fewer image‐guided radiation therapy shots and a lower imaging dose. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8833277 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88332772022-02-14 Differences in image density adjustment parameters on the image matching accuracy of a floor‐mounted kV X‐ray image‐guided radiation therapy system Sakuragawa, Kanako Sasaki, Motoharu Kamomae, Takeshi Yokoishi, Michihiro Kasai, Ryosuke Kajino, Akimi Ikushima, Hitoshi J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics This study aimed to investigate the effect of two different image density adjustment parameters on the results of image matching at six degrees of freedom using radiographic images generated by the ExacTrac X‐ray system in brain stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). This study comprised 32 patients who underwent brain SRS at our hospital from January 2020 to December 2020. In this study, (1) the default parameter (an image density parameter between “tissue” and “bone”) was an image density parameter for digitally reconstructed radiograph (DRR) generation used at many facilities, and (2) the bone parameter was the steepest contrast parameter used at our hospital. Of the 32 patients, 24 (75%) had a couch angle of 0.5 mm or more in the translational direction or 0.5° or more in the rotational direction, and 10 (31%) had a couch angle of 1.0 mm or more in the translational direction or 1.0° or more in the rotational direction. Among the 131 cases of all couch angles, 46 (35%) cases had a translational direction of 0.5 mm or more or a rotational direction of 0.5° or more, and 15 (11%) had a translational direction of 1.0 mm or more or a rotational direction of 1.0° or more. The results of this study indicate the usefulness of using appropriate DRR parameters for each case, rather than using the default settings. The use of appropriate DRR parameters can lead to accurate position matching results, leading to fewer image‐guided radiation therapy shots and a lower imaging dose. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-12-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8833277/ /pubmed/34931431 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13505 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, LLC on behalf of The American Association of Physicists in Medicine https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Radiation Oncology Physics Sakuragawa, Kanako Sasaki, Motoharu Kamomae, Takeshi Yokoishi, Michihiro Kasai, Ryosuke Kajino, Akimi Ikushima, Hitoshi Differences in image density adjustment parameters on the image matching accuracy of a floor‐mounted kV X‐ray image‐guided radiation therapy system |
title | Differences in image density adjustment parameters on the image matching accuracy of a floor‐mounted kV X‐ray image‐guided radiation therapy system |
title_full | Differences in image density adjustment parameters on the image matching accuracy of a floor‐mounted kV X‐ray image‐guided radiation therapy system |
title_fullStr | Differences in image density adjustment parameters on the image matching accuracy of a floor‐mounted kV X‐ray image‐guided radiation therapy system |
title_full_unstemmed | Differences in image density adjustment parameters on the image matching accuracy of a floor‐mounted kV X‐ray image‐guided radiation therapy system |
title_short | Differences in image density adjustment parameters on the image matching accuracy of a floor‐mounted kV X‐ray image‐guided radiation therapy system |
title_sort | differences in image density adjustment parameters on the image matching accuracy of a floor‐mounted kv x‐ray image‐guided radiation therapy system |
topic | Radiation Oncology Physics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8833277/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34931431 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13505 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sakuragawakanako differencesinimagedensityadjustmentparametersontheimagematchingaccuracyofafloormountedkvxrayimageguidedradiationtherapysystem AT sasakimotoharu differencesinimagedensityadjustmentparametersontheimagematchingaccuracyofafloormountedkvxrayimageguidedradiationtherapysystem AT kamomaetakeshi differencesinimagedensityadjustmentparametersontheimagematchingaccuracyofafloormountedkvxrayimageguidedradiationtherapysystem AT yokoishimichihiro differencesinimagedensityadjustmentparametersontheimagematchingaccuracyofafloormountedkvxrayimageguidedradiationtherapysystem AT kasairyosuke differencesinimagedensityadjustmentparametersontheimagematchingaccuracyofafloormountedkvxrayimageguidedradiationtherapysystem AT kajinoakimi differencesinimagedensityadjustmentparametersontheimagematchingaccuracyofafloormountedkvxrayimageguidedradiationtherapysystem AT ikushimahitoshi differencesinimagedensityadjustmentparametersontheimagematchingaccuracyofafloormountedkvxrayimageguidedradiationtherapysystem |