Cargando…

Differences in image density adjustment parameters on the image matching accuracy of a floor‐mounted kV X‐ray image‐guided radiation therapy system

This study aimed to investigate the effect of two different image density adjustment parameters on the results of image matching at six degrees of freedom using radiographic images generated by the ExacTrac X‐ray system in brain stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). This study comprised 32 patients who u...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sakuragawa, Kanako, Sasaki, Motoharu, Kamomae, Takeshi, Yokoishi, Michihiro, Kasai, Ryosuke, Kajino, Akimi, Ikushima, Hitoshi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8833277/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34931431
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13505
_version_ 1784648896284196864
author Sakuragawa, Kanako
Sasaki, Motoharu
Kamomae, Takeshi
Yokoishi, Michihiro
Kasai, Ryosuke
Kajino, Akimi
Ikushima, Hitoshi
author_facet Sakuragawa, Kanako
Sasaki, Motoharu
Kamomae, Takeshi
Yokoishi, Michihiro
Kasai, Ryosuke
Kajino, Akimi
Ikushima, Hitoshi
author_sort Sakuragawa, Kanako
collection PubMed
description This study aimed to investigate the effect of two different image density adjustment parameters on the results of image matching at six degrees of freedom using radiographic images generated by the ExacTrac X‐ray system in brain stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). This study comprised 32 patients who underwent brain SRS at our hospital from January 2020 to December 2020. In this study, (1) the default parameter (an image density parameter between “tissue” and “bone”) was an image density parameter for digitally reconstructed radiograph (DRR) generation used at many facilities, and (2) the bone parameter was the steepest contrast parameter used at our hospital. Of the 32 patients, 24 (75%) had a couch angle of 0.5 mm or more in the translational direction or 0.5° or more in the rotational direction, and 10 (31%) had a couch angle of 1.0 mm or more in the translational direction or 1.0° or more in the rotational direction. Among the 131 cases of all couch angles, 46 (35%) cases had a translational direction of 0.5 mm or more or a rotational direction of 0.5° or more, and 15 (11%) had a translational direction of 1.0 mm or more or a rotational direction of 1.0° or more. The results of this study indicate the usefulness of using appropriate DRR parameters for each case, rather than using the default settings. The use of appropriate DRR parameters can lead to accurate position matching results, leading to fewer image‐guided radiation therapy shots and a lower imaging dose.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8833277
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88332772022-02-14 Differences in image density adjustment parameters on the image matching accuracy of a floor‐mounted kV X‐ray image‐guided radiation therapy system Sakuragawa, Kanako Sasaki, Motoharu Kamomae, Takeshi Yokoishi, Michihiro Kasai, Ryosuke Kajino, Akimi Ikushima, Hitoshi J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics This study aimed to investigate the effect of two different image density adjustment parameters on the results of image matching at six degrees of freedom using radiographic images generated by the ExacTrac X‐ray system in brain stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). This study comprised 32 patients who underwent brain SRS at our hospital from January 2020 to December 2020. In this study, (1) the default parameter (an image density parameter between “tissue” and “bone”) was an image density parameter for digitally reconstructed radiograph (DRR) generation used at many facilities, and (2) the bone parameter was the steepest contrast parameter used at our hospital. Of the 32 patients, 24 (75%) had a couch angle of 0.5 mm or more in the translational direction or 0.5° or more in the rotational direction, and 10 (31%) had a couch angle of 1.0 mm or more in the translational direction or 1.0° or more in the rotational direction. Among the 131 cases of all couch angles, 46 (35%) cases had a translational direction of 0.5 mm or more or a rotational direction of 0.5° or more, and 15 (11%) had a translational direction of 1.0 mm or more or a rotational direction of 1.0° or more. The results of this study indicate the usefulness of using appropriate DRR parameters for each case, rather than using the default settings. The use of appropriate DRR parameters can lead to accurate position matching results, leading to fewer image‐guided radiation therapy shots and a lower imaging dose. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-12-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8833277/ /pubmed/34931431 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13505 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, LLC on behalf of The American Association of Physicists in Medicine https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Sakuragawa, Kanako
Sasaki, Motoharu
Kamomae, Takeshi
Yokoishi, Michihiro
Kasai, Ryosuke
Kajino, Akimi
Ikushima, Hitoshi
Differences in image density adjustment parameters on the image matching accuracy of a floor‐mounted kV X‐ray image‐guided radiation therapy system
title Differences in image density adjustment parameters on the image matching accuracy of a floor‐mounted kV X‐ray image‐guided radiation therapy system
title_full Differences in image density adjustment parameters on the image matching accuracy of a floor‐mounted kV X‐ray image‐guided radiation therapy system
title_fullStr Differences in image density adjustment parameters on the image matching accuracy of a floor‐mounted kV X‐ray image‐guided radiation therapy system
title_full_unstemmed Differences in image density adjustment parameters on the image matching accuracy of a floor‐mounted kV X‐ray image‐guided radiation therapy system
title_short Differences in image density adjustment parameters on the image matching accuracy of a floor‐mounted kV X‐ray image‐guided radiation therapy system
title_sort differences in image density adjustment parameters on the image matching accuracy of a floor‐mounted kv x‐ray image‐guided radiation therapy system
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8833277/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34931431
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13505
work_keys_str_mv AT sakuragawakanako differencesinimagedensityadjustmentparametersontheimagematchingaccuracyofafloormountedkvxrayimageguidedradiationtherapysystem
AT sasakimotoharu differencesinimagedensityadjustmentparametersontheimagematchingaccuracyofafloormountedkvxrayimageguidedradiationtherapysystem
AT kamomaetakeshi differencesinimagedensityadjustmentparametersontheimagematchingaccuracyofafloormountedkvxrayimageguidedradiationtherapysystem
AT yokoishimichihiro differencesinimagedensityadjustmentparametersontheimagematchingaccuracyofafloormountedkvxrayimageguidedradiationtherapysystem
AT kasairyosuke differencesinimagedensityadjustmentparametersontheimagematchingaccuracyofafloormountedkvxrayimageguidedradiationtherapysystem
AT kajinoakimi differencesinimagedensityadjustmentparametersontheimagematchingaccuracyofafloormountedkvxrayimageguidedradiationtherapysystem
AT ikushimahitoshi differencesinimagedensityadjustmentparametersontheimagematchingaccuracyofafloormountedkvxrayimageguidedradiationtherapysystem