Cargando…

Narrative Review of the Post-Operative Management of Prostate Cancer Patients: Is It Really the End of Adjuvant Radiotherapy?

SIMPLE SUMMARY: Among patients with prostate cancer who have been operated on, a subset harboring high-risk features will present with a biochemical recurrence (BCR). Adjuvant radiotherapy (aRT) was proven to significantly reduce the risk of BCR when compared to salvage radiotherapy (SRT) but suffer...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bourbonne, Vincent, Pradier, Olivier, Schick, Ulrike
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8833528/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35158986
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers14030719
_version_ 1784648965781716992
author Bourbonne, Vincent
Pradier, Olivier
Schick, Ulrike
author_facet Bourbonne, Vincent
Pradier, Olivier
Schick, Ulrike
author_sort Bourbonne, Vincent
collection PubMed
description SIMPLE SUMMARY: Among patients with prostate cancer who have been operated on, a subset harboring high-risk features will present with a biochemical recurrence (BCR). Adjuvant radiotherapy (aRT) was proven to significantly reduce the risk of BCR when compared to salvage radiotherapy (SRT) but suffered from several limitations: a lack of patient selection criteria, a higher treatment-related morbidity and an uncertain benefit for long-term clinical endpoints. In the same clinical setting, early SRT (eSRT) appears as non-inferior to aRT with a lower morbidity, replacing aRT as the preferred option. In this review, we insist on the need for multidisciplinary discussions to fully comprehend the individual characteristics of each patient and propose the best treatment strategy for every patient. ABSTRACT: Despite three randomized trials indicating a significant reduction in biochemical recurrence (BCR) in high-risk patients, adjuvant radiotherapy (aRT) was rarely performed, even in patients harboring high-risk features. aRT is associated with a higher risk of urinary incontinence and is often criticized for the lack of patient selection criteria. With a BCR rate reaching 30–70% in high-risk patients, a consensus between urologists and radiation oncologists was needed, leading to three different randomized trials challenging aRT with early salvage radiotherapy (eSRT). In these three different randomized trials with event-free survival as the primary outcome and a planned meta-analysis, eSRT appeared as non-inferior to aRT, answering, for some, this never-ending question. For many, however, the debate persists; these results raised several questions among urologists and radiation oncologists. BCR is thought to be a surrogate for clinically meaningful endpoints such as overall survival and cancer-specific survival but may be poorly efficient in comparison with metastasis-free survival. Imaging of rising prostate-specific antigen (PSA), post-operative persistent PSA and BCR was revolutionized by the broader use of MRI and nuclear imaging such as PET-PSMA; these imaging modalities were not analyzed in the previous randomized trials. A sub-group of very high-risk patients could possibly benefit from an adjuvant radiotherapy; but their usual risk factors such as high Gleason score or invaded surgical margins mean they are unable to be selected. More precise biomarkers of early BCR or even metastatic-relapse were developed in this setting and could be useful for the patients’ stratification. In this review, we insist on the need for multidisciplinary discussions to fully comprehend the individual characteristics of each patient and propose the best treatment strategy for every patient.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8833528
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88335282022-02-12 Narrative Review of the Post-Operative Management of Prostate Cancer Patients: Is It Really the End of Adjuvant Radiotherapy? Bourbonne, Vincent Pradier, Olivier Schick, Ulrike Cancers (Basel) Review SIMPLE SUMMARY: Among patients with prostate cancer who have been operated on, a subset harboring high-risk features will present with a biochemical recurrence (BCR). Adjuvant radiotherapy (aRT) was proven to significantly reduce the risk of BCR when compared to salvage radiotherapy (SRT) but suffered from several limitations: a lack of patient selection criteria, a higher treatment-related morbidity and an uncertain benefit for long-term clinical endpoints. In the same clinical setting, early SRT (eSRT) appears as non-inferior to aRT with a lower morbidity, replacing aRT as the preferred option. In this review, we insist on the need for multidisciplinary discussions to fully comprehend the individual characteristics of each patient and propose the best treatment strategy for every patient. ABSTRACT: Despite three randomized trials indicating a significant reduction in biochemical recurrence (BCR) in high-risk patients, adjuvant radiotherapy (aRT) was rarely performed, even in patients harboring high-risk features. aRT is associated with a higher risk of urinary incontinence and is often criticized for the lack of patient selection criteria. With a BCR rate reaching 30–70% in high-risk patients, a consensus between urologists and radiation oncologists was needed, leading to three different randomized trials challenging aRT with early salvage radiotherapy (eSRT). In these three different randomized trials with event-free survival as the primary outcome and a planned meta-analysis, eSRT appeared as non-inferior to aRT, answering, for some, this never-ending question. For many, however, the debate persists; these results raised several questions among urologists and radiation oncologists. BCR is thought to be a surrogate for clinically meaningful endpoints such as overall survival and cancer-specific survival but may be poorly efficient in comparison with metastasis-free survival. Imaging of rising prostate-specific antigen (PSA), post-operative persistent PSA and BCR was revolutionized by the broader use of MRI and nuclear imaging such as PET-PSMA; these imaging modalities were not analyzed in the previous randomized trials. A sub-group of very high-risk patients could possibly benefit from an adjuvant radiotherapy; but their usual risk factors such as high Gleason score or invaded surgical margins mean they are unable to be selected. More precise biomarkers of early BCR or even metastatic-relapse were developed in this setting and could be useful for the patients’ stratification. In this review, we insist on the need for multidisciplinary discussions to fully comprehend the individual characteristics of each patient and propose the best treatment strategy for every patient. MDPI 2022-01-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8833528/ /pubmed/35158986 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers14030719 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Bourbonne, Vincent
Pradier, Olivier
Schick, Ulrike
Narrative Review of the Post-Operative Management of Prostate Cancer Patients: Is It Really the End of Adjuvant Radiotherapy?
title Narrative Review of the Post-Operative Management of Prostate Cancer Patients: Is It Really the End of Adjuvant Radiotherapy?
title_full Narrative Review of the Post-Operative Management of Prostate Cancer Patients: Is It Really the End of Adjuvant Radiotherapy?
title_fullStr Narrative Review of the Post-Operative Management of Prostate Cancer Patients: Is It Really the End of Adjuvant Radiotherapy?
title_full_unstemmed Narrative Review of the Post-Operative Management of Prostate Cancer Patients: Is It Really the End of Adjuvant Radiotherapy?
title_short Narrative Review of the Post-Operative Management of Prostate Cancer Patients: Is It Really the End of Adjuvant Radiotherapy?
title_sort narrative review of the post-operative management of prostate cancer patients: is it really the end of adjuvant radiotherapy?
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8833528/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35158986
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers14030719
work_keys_str_mv AT bourbonnevincent narrativereviewofthepostoperativemanagementofprostatecancerpatientsisitreallytheendofadjuvantradiotherapy
AT pradierolivier narrativereviewofthepostoperativemanagementofprostatecancerpatientsisitreallytheendofadjuvantradiotherapy
AT schickulrike narrativereviewofthepostoperativemanagementofprostatecancerpatientsisitreallytheendofadjuvantradiotherapy