Cargando…

Refining epileptogenic high-frequency oscillations using deep learning: a reverse engineering approach

Intracranially recorded interictal high-frequency oscillations have been proposed as a promising spatial biomarker of the epileptogenic zone. However, its visual verification is time-consuming and exhibits poor inter-rater reliability. Furthermore, no method is currently available to distinguish hig...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Yipeng, Lu, Qiujing, Monsoor, Tonmoy, Hussain, Shaun A., Qiao, Joe X., Salamon, Noriko, Fallah, Aria, Sim, Myung Shin, Asano, Eishi, Sankar, Raman, Staba, Richard J., Engel, Jerome, Speier, William, Roychowdhury, Vwani, Nariai, Hiroki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8833577/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35169696
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/braincomms/fcab267
_version_ 1784648977973510144
author Zhang, Yipeng
Lu, Qiujing
Monsoor, Tonmoy
Hussain, Shaun A.
Qiao, Joe X.
Salamon, Noriko
Fallah, Aria
Sim, Myung Shin
Asano, Eishi
Sankar, Raman
Staba, Richard J.
Engel, Jerome
Speier, William
Roychowdhury, Vwani
Nariai, Hiroki
author_facet Zhang, Yipeng
Lu, Qiujing
Monsoor, Tonmoy
Hussain, Shaun A.
Qiao, Joe X.
Salamon, Noriko
Fallah, Aria
Sim, Myung Shin
Asano, Eishi
Sankar, Raman
Staba, Richard J.
Engel, Jerome
Speier, William
Roychowdhury, Vwani
Nariai, Hiroki
author_sort Zhang, Yipeng
collection PubMed
description Intracranially recorded interictal high-frequency oscillations have been proposed as a promising spatial biomarker of the epileptogenic zone. However, its visual verification is time-consuming and exhibits poor inter-rater reliability. Furthermore, no method is currently available to distinguish high-frequency oscillations generated from the epileptogenic zone (epileptogenic high-frequency oscillations) from those generated from other areas (non-epileptogenic high-frequency oscillations). To address these issues, we constructed a deep learning-based algorithm using chronic intracranial EEG data via subdural grids from 19 children with medication-resistant neocortical epilepsy to: (i) replicate human expert annotation of artefacts and high-frequency oscillations with or without spikes, and (ii) discover epileptogenic high-frequency oscillations by designing a novel weakly supervised model. The ‘purification power’ of deep learning is then used to automatically relabel the high-frequency oscillations to distill epileptogenic high-frequency oscillations. Using 12 958 annotated high-frequency oscillation events from 19 patients, the model achieved 96.3% accuracy on artefact detection (F1 score = 96.8%) and 86.5% accuracy on classifying high-frequency oscillations with or without spikes (F1 score = 80.8%) using patient-wise cross-validation. Based on the algorithm trained from 84 602 high-frequency oscillation events from nine patients who achieved seizure-freedom after resection, the majority of such discovered epileptogenic high-frequency oscillations were found to be ones with spikes (78.6%, P < 0.001). While the resection ratio of detected high-frequency oscillations (number of resected events/number of detected events) did not correlate significantly with post-operative seizure freedom (the area under the curve = 0.76, P = 0.06), the resection ratio of epileptogenic high-frequency oscillations positively correlated with post-operative seizure freedom (the area under the curve = 0.87, P = 0.01). We discovered that epileptogenic high-frequency oscillations had a higher signal intensity associated with ripple (80–250 Hz) and fast ripple (250–500 Hz) bands at the high-frequency oscillation onset and with a lower frequency band throughout the event time window (the inverted T-shaped), compared to non-epileptogenic high-frequency oscillations. We then designed perturbations on the input of the trained model for non-epileptogenic high-frequency oscillations to determine the model’s decision-making logic. The model confidence significantly increased towards epileptogenic high-frequency oscillations by the artificial introduction of the inverted T-shaped signal template (mean probability increase: 0.285, P < 0.001), and by the artificial insertion of spike-like signals into the time domain (mean probability increase: 0.452, P < 0.001). With this deep learning-based framework, we reliably replicated high-frequency oscillation classification tasks by human experts. Using a reverse engineering technique, we distinguished epileptogenic high-frequency oscillations from others and identified its salient features that aligned with current knowledge.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8833577
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88335772022-02-14 Refining epileptogenic high-frequency oscillations using deep learning: a reverse engineering approach Zhang, Yipeng Lu, Qiujing Monsoor, Tonmoy Hussain, Shaun A. Qiao, Joe X. Salamon, Noriko Fallah, Aria Sim, Myung Shin Asano, Eishi Sankar, Raman Staba, Richard J. Engel, Jerome Speier, William Roychowdhury, Vwani Nariai, Hiroki Brain Commun Original Article Intracranially recorded interictal high-frequency oscillations have been proposed as a promising spatial biomarker of the epileptogenic zone. However, its visual verification is time-consuming and exhibits poor inter-rater reliability. Furthermore, no method is currently available to distinguish high-frequency oscillations generated from the epileptogenic zone (epileptogenic high-frequency oscillations) from those generated from other areas (non-epileptogenic high-frequency oscillations). To address these issues, we constructed a deep learning-based algorithm using chronic intracranial EEG data via subdural grids from 19 children with medication-resistant neocortical epilepsy to: (i) replicate human expert annotation of artefacts and high-frequency oscillations with or without spikes, and (ii) discover epileptogenic high-frequency oscillations by designing a novel weakly supervised model. The ‘purification power’ of deep learning is then used to automatically relabel the high-frequency oscillations to distill epileptogenic high-frequency oscillations. Using 12 958 annotated high-frequency oscillation events from 19 patients, the model achieved 96.3% accuracy on artefact detection (F1 score = 96.8%) and 86.5% accuracy on classifying high-frequency oscillations with or without spikes (F1 score = 80.8%) using patient-wise cross-validation. Based on the algorithm trained from 84 602 high-frequency oscillation events from nine patients who achieved seizure-freedom after resection, the majority of such discovered epileptogenic high-frequency oscillations were found to be ones with spikes (78.6%, P < 0.001). While the resection ratio of detected high-frequency oscillations (number of resected events/number of detected events) did not correlate significantly with post-operative seizure freedom (the area under the curve = 0.76, P = 0.06), the resection ratio of epileptogenic high-frequency oscillations positively correlated with post-operative seizure freedom (the area under the curve = 0.87, P = 0.01). We discovered that epileptogenic high-frequency oscillations had a higher signal intensity associated with ripple (80–250 Hz) and fast ripple (250–500 Hz) bands at the high-frequency oscillation onset and with a lower frequency band throughout the event time window (the inverted T-shaped), compared to non-epileptogenic high-frequency oscillations. We then designed perturbations on the input of the trained model for non-epileptogenic high-frequency oscillations to determine the model’s decision-making logic. The model confidence significantly increased towards epileptogenic high-frequency oscillations by the artificial introduction of the inverted T-shaped signal template (mean probability increase: 0.285, P < 0.001), and by the artificial insertion of spike-like signals into the time domain (mean probability increase: 0.452, P < 0.001). With this deep learning-based framework, we reliably replicated high-frequency oscillation classification tasks by human experts. Using a reverse engineering technique, we distinguished epileptogenic high-frequency oscillations from others and identified its salient features that aligned with current knowledge. Oxford University Press 2021-11-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8833577/ /pubmed/35169696 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/braincomms/fcab267 Text en © The Author(s) (2021). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Guarantors of Brain. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Zhang, Yipeng
Lu, Qiujing
Monsoor, Tonmoy
Hussain, Shaun A.
Qiao, Joe X.
Salamon, Noriko
Fallah, Aria
Sim, Myung Shin
Asano, Eishi
Sankar, Raman
Staba, Richard J.
Engel, Jerome
Speier, William
Roychowdhury, Vwani
Nariai, Hiroki
Refining epileptogenic high-frequency oscillations using deep learning: a reverse engineering approach
title Refining epileptogenic high-frequency oscillations using deep learning: a reverse engineering approach
title_full Refining epileptogenic high-frequency oscillations using deep learning: a reverse engineering approach
title_fullStr Refining epileptogenic high-frequency oscillations using deep learning: a reverse engineering approach
title_full_unstemmed Refining epileptogenic high-frequency oscillations using deep learning: a reverse engineering approach
title_short Refining epileptogenic high-frequency oscillations using deep learning: a reverse engineering approach
title_sort refining epileptogenic high-frequency oscillations using deep learning: a reverse engineering approach
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8833577/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35169696
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/braincomms/fcab267
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangyipeng refiningepileptogenichighfrequencyoscillationsusingdeeplearningareverseengineeringapproach
AT luqiujing refiningepileptogenichighfrequencyoscillationsusingdeeplearningareverseengineeringapproach
AT monsoortonmoy refiningepileptogenichighfrequencyoscillationsusingdeeplearningareverseengineeringapproach
AT hussainshauna refiningepileptogenichighfrequencyoscillationsusingdeeplearningareverseengineeringapproach
AT qiaojoex refiningepileptogenichighfrequencyoscillationsusingdeeplearningareverseengineeringapproach
AT salamonnoriko refiningepileptogenichighfrequencyoscillationsusingdeeplearningareverseengineeringapproach
AT fallaharia refiningepileptogenichighfrequencyoscillationsusingdeeplearningareverseengineeringapproach
AT simmyungshin refiningepileptogenichighfrequencyoscillationsusingdeeplearningareverseengineeringapproach
AT asanoeishi refiningepileptogenichighfrequencyoscillationsusingdeeplearningareverseengineeringapproach
AT sankarraman refiningepileptogenichighfrequencyoscillationsusingdeeplearningareverseengineeringapproach
AT stabarichardj refiningepileptogenichighfrequencyoscillationsusingdeeplearningareverseengineeringapproach
AT engeljerome refiningepileptogenichighfrequencyoscillationsusingdeeplearningareverseengineeringapproach
AT speierwilliam refiningepileptogenichighfrequencyoscillationsusingdeeplearningareverseengineeringapproach
AT roychowdhuryvwani refiningepileptogenichighfrequencyoscillationsusingdeeplearningareverseengineeringapproach
AT nariaihiroki refiningepileptogenichighfrequencyoscillationsusingdeeplearningareverseengineeringapproach