Cargando…
The Use of ctDNA for BRAF Mutation Testing in Routine Clinical Practice in Patients with Advanced Melanoma
SIMPLE SUMMARY: Assessment of BRAF mutation status is mandatory in advanced, previously untreated melanoma patients since it is present in 40–50% of cases and allows treatment with specific inhibitors. The testing is usually performed on the primary tumor or metastatic lesion; however, in some cases...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8833667/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35159044 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers14030777 |
_version_ | 1784649001044279296 |
---|---|
author | Sobczuk, Paweł Kozak, Katarzyna Kopeć, Sylwia Rogala, Paweł Świtaj, Tomasz Koseła-Paterczyk, Hanna Gos, Aleksandra Tysarowski, Andrzej Rutkowski, Piotr |
author_facet | Sobczuk, Paweł Kozak, Katarzyna Kopeć, Sylwia Rogala, Paweł Świtaj, Tomasz Koseła-Paterczyk, Hanna Gos, Aleksandra Tysarowski, Andrzej Rutkowski, Piotr |
author_sort | Sobczuk, Paweł |
collection | PubMed |
description | SIMPLE SUMMARY: Assessment of BRAF mutation status is mandatory in advanced, previously untreated melanoma patients since it is present in 40–50% of cases and allows treatment with specific inhibitors. The testing is usually performed on the primary tumor or metastatic lesion; however, in some cases, liquid biopsy and analysis of circulating tumor DNA in the blood can be used. The aim of our study was to evaluate the clinical utility of plasma circulating tumor DNA analysis for BRAF mutation. We identified 46 patients (21 female, 25 male) who underwent such a procedure. A BRAF mutation was found in 45.7% of liquid biopsies and 44.8% of tissue samples. In 18 patients, therapy with BRAF/MEK inhibitors was initiated on the basis of the result of liquid biopsy. Our study confirms the clinical utility of BRAF mutation detection in liquid biopsy. ABSTRACT: Assessment of BRAF mutation status is mandatory in advanced, treatment-naïve melanoma patients. Liquid biopsy can be an alternative in cases with inadequate or unavailable tumor tissue. The aim of our study was to evaluate the clinical utility of plasma circulating tumor DNA analysis for BRAF mutation testing and to assess outcomes of therapy with BRAF/MEK inhibitors initiated based on the liquid biopsy results. This was a retrospective single-center analysis of 46 patients (21 female, 25 male) with advanced melanoma who underwent circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) BRAF mutation testing. A BRAF mutation was found in 45.7% (21/46) of liquid biopsies and 44.8% (13/29) of tissue samples. In patients with both ctDNA and tissue samples (n = 29), the concordance between the results of both tests was 82.8%. A BRAF mutation was detected in 7/17 (41.2%) patients with only ctDNA analysis. In 18 patients, therapy with BRAF/MEK inhibitors was initiated on the basis of the result of liquid biopsy. The objective response rate was 77.8 %, and the median PFS was 6.0 months. Our study confirms the clinical utility of BRAF mutation detection in plasma ctDNA. This study provides initial real-world data showing that treatment with BRAF/MEK inhibitors could be commenced based on liquid biopsy results. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8833667 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88336672022-02-12 The Use of ctDNA for BRAF Mutation Testing in Routine Clinical Practice in Patients with Advanced Melanoma Sobczuk, Paweł Kozak, Katarzyna Kopeć, Sylwia Rogala, Paweł Świtaj, Tomasz Koseła-Paterczyk, Hanna Gos, Aleksandra Tysarowski, Andrzej Rutkowski, Piotr Cancers (Basel) Article SIMPLE SUMMARY: Assessment of BRAF mutation status is mandatory in advanced, previously untreated melanoma patients since it is present in 40–50% of cases and allows treatment with specific inhibitors. The testing is usually performed on the primary tumor or metastatic lesion; however, in some cases, liquid biopsy and analysis of circulating tumor DNA in the blood can be used. The aim of our study was to evaluate the clinical utility of plasma circulating tumor DNA analysis for BRAF mutation. We identified 46 patients (21 female, 25 male) who underwent such a procedure. A BRAF mutation was found in 45.7% of liquid biopsies and 44.8% of tissue samples. In 18 patients, therapy with BRAF/MEK inhibitors was initiated on the basis of the result of liquid biopsy. Our study confirms the clinical utility of BRAF mutation detection in liquid biopsy. ABSTRACT: Assessment of BRAF mutation status is mandatory in advanced, treatment-naïve melanoma patients. Liquid biopsy can be an alternative in cases with inadequate or unavailable tumor tissue. The aim of our study was to evaluate the clinical utility of plasma circulating tumor DNA analysis for BRAF mutation testing and to assess outcomes of therapy with BRAF/MEK inhibitors initiated based on the liquid biopsy results. This was a retrospective single-center analysis of 46 patients (21 female, 25 male) with advanced melanoma who underwent circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) BRAF mutation testing. A BRAF mutation was found in 45.7% (21/46) of liquid biopsies and 44.8% (13/29) of tissue samples. In patients with both ctDNA and tissue samples (n = 29), the concordance between the results of both tests was 82.8%. A BRAF mutation was detected in 7/17 (41.2%) patients with only ctDNA analysis. In 18 patients, therapy with BRAF/MEK inhibitors was initiated on the basis of the result of liquid biopsy. The objective response rate was 77.8 %, and the median PFS was 6.0 months. Our study confirms the clinical utility of BRAF mutation detection in plasma ctDNA. This study provides initial real-world data showing that treatment with BRAF/MEK inhibitors could be commenced based on liquid biopsy results. MDPI 2022-02-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8833667/ /pubmed/35159044 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers14030777 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Sobczuk, Paweł Kozak, Katarzyna Kopeć, Sylwia Rogala, Paweł Świtaj, Tomasz Koseła-Paterczyk, Hanna Gos, Aleksandra Tysarowski, Andrzej Rutkowski, Piotr The Use of ctDNA for BRAF Mutation Testing in Routine Clinical Practice in Patients with Advanced Melanoma |
title | The Use of ctDNA for BRAF Mutation Testing in Routine Clinical Practice in Patients with Advanced Melanoma |
title_full | The Use of ctDNA for BRAF Mutation Testing in Routine Clinical Practice in Patients with Advanced Melanoma |
title_fullStr | The Use of ctDNA for BRAF Mutation Testing in Routine Clinical Practice in Patients with Advanced Melanoma |
title_full_unstemmed | The Use of ctDNA for BRAF Mutation Testing in Routine Clinical Practice in Patients with Advanced Melanoma |
title_short | The Use of ctDNA for BRAF Mutation Testing in Routine Clinical Practice in Patients with Advanced Melanoma |
title_sort | use of ctdna for braf mutation testing in routine clinical practice in patients with advanced melanoma |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8833667/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35159044 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers14030777 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sobczukpaweł theuseofctdnaforbrafmutationtestinginroutineclinicalpracticeinpatientswithadvancedmelanoma AT kozakkatarzyna theuseofctdnaforbrafmutationtestinginroutineclinicalpracticeinpatientswithadvancedmelanoma AT kopecsylwia theuseofctdnaforbrafmutationtestinginroutineclinicalpracticeinpatientswithadvancedmelanoma AT rogalapaweł theuseofctdnaforbrafmutationtestinginroutineclinicalpracticeinpatientswithadvancedmelanoma AT switajtomasz theuseofctdnaforbrafmutationtestinginroutineclinicalpracticeinpatientswithadvancedmelanoma AT kosełapaterczykhanna theuseofctdnaforbrafmutationtestinginroutineclinicalpracticeinpatientswithadvancedmelanoma AT gosaleksandra theuseofctdnaforbrafmutationtestinginroutineclinicalpracticeinpatientswithadvancedmelanoma AT tysarowskiandrzej theuseofctdnaforbrafmutationtestinginroutineclinicalpracticeinpatientswithadvancedmelanoma AT rutkowskipiotr theuseofctdnaforbrafmutationtestinginroutineclinicalpracticeinpatientswithadvancedmelanoma AT sobczukpaweł useofctdnaforbrafmutationtestinginroutineclinicalpracticeinpatientswithadvancedmelanoma AT kozakkatarzyna useofctdnaforbrafmutationtestinginroutineclinicalpracticeinpatientswithadvancedmelanoma AT kopecsylwia useofctdnaforbrafmutationtestinginroutineclinicalpracticeinpatientswithadvancedmelanoma AT rogalapaweł useofctdnaforbrafmutationtestinginroutineclinicalpracticeinpatientswithadvancedmelanoma AT switajtomasz useofctdnaforbrafmutationtestinginroutineclinicalpracticeinpatientswithadvancedmelanoma AT kosełapaterczykhanna useofctdnaforbrafmutationtestinginroutineclinicalpracticeinpatientswithadvancedmelanoma AT gosaleksandra useofctdnaforbrafmutationtestinginroutineclinicalpracticeinpatientswithadvancedmelanoma AT tysarowskiandrzej useofctdnaforbrafmutationtestinginroutineclinicalpracticeinpatientswithadvancedmelanoma AT rutkowskipiotr useofctdnaforbrafmutationtestinginroutineclinicalpracticeinpatientswithadvancedmelanoma |