Cargando…

The Use of ctDNA for BRAF Mutation Testing in Routine Clinical Practice in Patients with Advanced Melanoma

SIMPLE SUMMARY: Assessment of BRAF mutation status is mandatory in advanced, previously untreated melanoma patients since it is present in 40–50% of cases and allows treatment with specific inhibitors. The testing is usually performed on the primary tumor or metastatic lesion; however, in some cases...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sobczuk, Paweł, Kozak, Katarzyna, Kopeć, Sylwia, Rogala, Paweł, Świtaj, Tomasz, Koseła-Paterczyk, Hanna, Gos, Aleksandra, Tysarowski, Andrzej, Rutkowski, Piotr
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8833667/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35159044
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers14030777
_version_ 1784649001044279296
author Sobczuk, Paweł
Kozak, Katarzyna
Kopeć, Sylwia
Rogala, Paweł
Świtaj, Tomasz
Koseła-Paterczyk, Hanna
Gos, Aleksandra
Tysarowski, Andrzej
Rutkowski, Piotr
author_facet Sobczuk, Paweł
Kozak, Katarzyna
Kopeć, Sylwia
Rogala, Paweł
Świtaj, Tomasz
Koseła-Paterczyk, Hanna
Gos, Aleksandra
Tysarowski, Andrzej
Rutkowski, Piotr
author_sort Sobczuk, Paweł
collection PubMed
description SIMPLE SUMMARY: Assessment of BRAF mutation status is mandatory in advanced, previously untreated melanoma patients since it is present in 40–50% of cases and allows treatment with specific inhibitors. The testing is usually performed on the primary tumor or metastatic lesion; however, in some cases, liquid biopsy and analysis of circulating tumor DNA in the blood can be used. The aim of our study was to evaluate the clinical utility of plasma circulating tumor DNA analysis for BRAF mutation. We identified 46 patients (21 female, 25 male) who underwent such a procedure. A BRAF mutation was found in 45.7% of liquid biopsies and 44.8% of tissue samples. In 18 patients, therapy with BRAF/MEK inhibitors was initiated on the basis of the result of liquid biopsy. Our study confirms the clinical utility of BRAF mutation detection in liquid biopsy. ABSTRACT: Assessment of BRAF mutation status is mandatory in advanced, treatment-naïve melanoma patients. Liquid biopsy can be an alternative in cases with inadequate or unavailable tumor tissue. The aim of our study was to evaluate the clinical utility of plasma circulating tumor DNA analysis for BRAF mutation testing and to assess outcomes of therapy with BRAF/MEK inhibitors initiated based on the liquid biopsy results. This was a retrospective single-center analysis of 46 patients (21 female, 25 male) with advanced melanoma who underwent circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) BRAF mutation testing. A BRAF mutation was found in 45.7% (21/46) of liquid biopsies and 44.8% (13/29) of tissue samples. In patients with both ctDNA and tissue samples (n = 29), the concordance between the results of both tests was 82.8%. A BRAF mutation was detected in 7/17 (41.2%) patients with only ctDNA analysis. In 18 patients, therapy with BRAF/MEK inhibitors was initiated on the basis of the result of liquid biopsy. The objective response rate was 77.8 %, and the median PFS was 6.0 months. Our study confirms the clinical utility of BRAF mutation detection in plasma ctDNA. This study provides initial real-world data showing that treatment with BRAF/MEK inhibitors could be commenced based on liquid biopsy results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8833667
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88336672022-02-12 The Use of ctDNA for BRAF Mutation Testing in Routine Clinical Practice in Patients with Advanced Melanoma Sobczuk, Paweł Kozak, Katarzyna Kopeć, Sylwia Rogala, Paweł Świtaj, Tomasz Koseła-Paterczyk, Hanna Gos, Aleksandra Tysarowski, Andrzej Rutkowski, Piotr Cancers (Basel) Article SIMPLE SUMMARY: Assessment of BRAF mutation status is mandatory in advanced, previously untreated melanoma patients since it is present in 40–50% of cases and allows treatment with specific inhibitors. The testing is usually performed on the primary tumor or metastatic lesion; however, in some cases, liquid biopsy and analysis of circulating tumor DNA in the blood can be used. The aim of our study was to evaluate the clinical utility of plasma circulating tumor DNA analysis for BRAF mutation. We identified 46 patients (21 female, 25 male) who underwent such a procedure. A BRAF mutation was found in 45.7% of liquid biopsies and 44.8% of tissue samples. In 18 patients, therapy with BRAF/MEK inhibitors was initiated on the basis of the result of liquid biopsy. Our study confirms the clinical utility of BRAF mutation detection in liquid biopsy. ABSTRACT: Assessment of BRAF mutation status is mandatory in advanced, treatment-naïve melanoma patients. Liquid biopsy can be an alternative in cases with inadequate or unavailable tumor tissue. The aim of our study was to evaluate the clinical utility of plasma circulating tumor DNA analysis for BRAF mutation testing and to assess outcomes of therapy with BRAF/MEK inhibitors initiated based on the liquid biopsy results. This was a retrospective single-center analysis of 46 patients (21 female, 25 male) with advanced melanoma who underwent circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) BRAF mutation testing. A BRAF mutation was found in 45.7% (21/46) of liquid biopsies and 44.8% (13/29) of tissue samples. In patients with both ctDNA and tissue samples (n = 29), the concordance between the results of both tests was 82.8%. A BRAF mutation was detected in 7/17 (41.2%) patients with only ctDNA analysis. In 18 patients, therapy with BRAF/MEK inhibitors was initiated on the basis of the result of liquid biopsy. The objective response rate was 77.8 %, and the median PFS was 6.0 months. Our study confirms the clinical utility of BRAF mutation detection in plasma ctDNA. This study provides initial real-world data showing that treatment with BRAF/MEK inhibitors could be commenced based on liquid biopsy results. MDPI 2022-02-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8833667/ /pubmed/35159044 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers14030777 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Sobczuk, Paweł
Kozak, Katarzyna
Kopeć, Sylwia
Rogala, Paweł
Świtaj, Tomasz
Koseła-Paterczyk, Hanna
Gos, Aleksandra
Tysarowski, Andrzej
Rutkowski, Piotr
The Use of ctDNA for BRAF Mutation Testing in Routine Clinical Practice in Patients with Advanced Melanoma
title The Use of ctDNA for BRAF Mutation Testing in Routine Clinical Practice in Patients with Advanced Melanoma
title_full The Use of ctDNA for BRAF Mutation Testing in Routine Clinical Practice in Patients with Advanced Melanoma
title_fullStr The Use of ctDNA for BRAF Mutation Testing in Routine Clinical Practice in Patients with Advanced Melanoma
title_full_unstemmed The Use of ctDNA for BRAF Mutation Testing in Routine Clinical Practice in Patients with Advanced Melanoma
title_short The Use of ctDNA for BRAF Mutation Testing in Routine Clinical Practice in Patients with Advanced Melanoma
title_sort use of ctdna for braf mutation testing in routine clinical practice in patients with advanced melanoma
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8833667/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35159044
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers14030777
work_keys_str_mv AT sobczukpaweł theuseofctdnaforbrafmutationtestinginroutineclinicalpracticeinpatientswithadvancedmelanoma
AT kozakkatarzyna theuseofctdnaforbrafmutationtestinginroutineclinicalpracticeinpatientswithadvancedmelanoma
AT kopecsylwia theuseofctdnaforbrafmutationtestinginroutineclinicalpracticeinpatientswithadvancedmelanoma
AT rogalapaweł theuseofctdnaforbrafmutationtestinginroutineclinicalpracticeinpatientswithadvancedmelanoma
AT switajtomasz theuseofctdnaforbrafmutationtestinginroutineclinicalpracticeinpatientswithadvancedmelanoma
AT kosełapaterczykhanna theuseofctdnaforbrafmutationtestinginroutineclinicalpracticeinpatientswithadvancedmelanoma
AT gosaleksandra theuseofctdnaforbrafmutationtestinginroutineclinicalpracticeinpatientswithadvancedmelanoma
AT tysarowskiandrzej theuseofctdnaforbrafmutationtestinginroutineclinicalpracticeinpatientswithadvancedmelanoma
AT rutkowskipiotr theuseofctdnaforbrafmutationtestinginroutineclinicalpracticeinpatientswithadvancedmelanoma
AT sobczukpaweł useofctdnaforbrafmutationtestinginroutineclinicalpracticeinpatientswithadvancedmelanoma
AT kozakkatarzyna useofctdnaforbrafmutationtestinginroutineclinicalpracticeinpatientswithadvancedmelanoma
AT kopecsylwia useofctdnaforbrafmutationtestinginroutineclinicalpracticeinpatientswithadvancedmelanoma
AT rogalapaweł useofctdnaforbrafmutationtestinginroutineclinicalpracticeinpatientswithadvancedmelanoma
AT switajtomasz useofctdnaforbrafmutationtestinginroutineclinicalpracticeinpatientswithadvancedmelanoma
AT kosełapaterczykhanna useofctdnaforbrafmutationtestinginroutineclinicalpracticeinpatientswithadvancedmelanoma
AT gosaleksandra useofctdnaforbrafmutationtestinginroutineclinicalpracticeinpatientswithadvancedmelanoma
AT tysarowskiandrzej useofctdnaforbrafmutationtestinginroutineclinicalpracticeinpatientswithadvancedmelanoma
AT rutkowskipiotr useofctdnaforbrafmutationtestinginroutineclinicalpracticeinpatientswithadvancedmelanoma