Cargando…

Economic Evaluation of a Geriatric Oncology Clinic

SIMPLE SUMMARY: There is increasing evidence supporting geriatric assessment (GA) prior to starting cancer treatment in older adults. However, GA is not widely available. One reason may be the lack of persuasive economic data demonstrating its value. We performed an economic evaluation of an academi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alibhai, Shabbir M. H., Alam, Zuhair, Saluja, Ronak, Malik, Uzair, Warde, Padraig, Jin, Rana, Berger, Arielle, Romanovsky, Lindy, Chan, Kelvin K. W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8833958/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35159056
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers14030789
_version_ 1784649063957790720
author Alibhai, Shabbir M. H.
Alam, Zuhair
Saluja, Ronak
Malik, Uzair
Warde, Padraig
Jin, Rana
Berger, Arielle
Romanovsky, Lindy
Chan, Kelvin K. W.
author_facet Alibhai, Shabbir M. H.
Alam, Zuhair
Saluja, Ronak
Malik, Uzair
Warde, Padraig
Jin, Rana
Berger, Arielle
Romanovsky, Lindy
Chan, Kelvin K. W.
author_sort Alibhai, Shabbir M. H.
collection PubMed
description SIMPLE SUMMARY: There is increasing evidence supporting geriatric assessment (GA) prior to starting cancer treatment in older adults. However, GA is not widely available. One reason may be the lack of persuasive economic data demonstrating its value. We performed an economic evaluation of an academic geriatric oncology clinic and included 152 patients aged 65 years and older who underwent a GA in the pre-treatment setting. We carefully calculated the costs of the proposed treatment (prior to the GA), costs of the GA and associated recommendations, costs of the final treatment, and overall value. We found a GA saved CAD 7387 per patient seen. Extensive sensitivity analyses supported our finding that a GA is economically attractive and should be implemented more widely. ABSTRACT: Geriatric assessment (GA) is supported by recent trials and guidelines yet rarely implemented due to a lack of resources. We performed an economic evaluation of a geriatric oncology clinic. Pre-GA proposed treatments and post-GA actual treatments were obtained from a detailed chart review of patients seen at a single academic centre. GA-based costs for investigations and referrals were calculated. Unit costs were obtained for surgical, radiation, systemic therapy, laboratory, imaging, physician, nursing, and allied health care (all in 2019 Canadian dollars). A six-month time horizon and government payer perspective were used. Consecutive patients aged 65 years or older (n = 152, mean age 82 y) and referred in the pre-treatment setting between July 2016 and June 2018 were included. Treatment plans were modified for 51% of patients. Costs associated with planned treatment were CAD 3,655,015. Costs associated with GA and related interventions were CAD 95,798. Final treatment costs were CAD 2,436,379. Net savings associated with the clinic were CAD 1,122,837, or CAD 7387 per patient seen. Findings were robust in multiple sensitivity analyses. Combined with mounting trial data demonstrating the clinical benefits of GA, our data can inform a strong business case for geriatric oncology clinics in health care environments similar to ours, but additional studies in diverse health care settings are warranted.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8833958
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88339582022-02-12 Economic Evaluation of a Geriatric Oncology Clinic Alibhai, Shabbir M. H. Alam, Zuhair Saluja, Ronak Malik, Uzair Warde, Padraig Jin, Rana Berger, Arielle Romanovsky, Lindy Chan, Kelvin K. W. Cancers (Basel) Article SIMPLE SUMMARY: There is increasing evidence supporting geriatric assessment (GA) prior to starting cancer treatment in older adults. However, GA is not widely available. One reason may be the lack of persuasive economic data demonstrating its value. We performed an economic evaluation of an academic geriatric oncology clinic and included 152 patients aged 65 years and older who underwent a GA in the pre-treatment setting. We carefully calculated the costs of the proposed treatment (prior to the GA), costs of the GA and associated recommendations, costs of the final treatment, and overall value. We found a GA saved CAD 7387 per patient seen. Extensive sensitivity analyses supported our finding that a GA is economically attractive and should be implemented more widely. ABSTRACT: Geriatric assessment (GA) is supported by recent trials and guidelines yet rarely implemented due to a lack of resources. We performed an economic evaluation of a geriatric oncology clinic. Pre-GA proposed treatments and post-GA actual treatments were obtained from a detailed chart review of patients seen at a single academic centre. GA-based costs for investigations and referrals were calculated. Unit costs were obtained for surgical, radiation, systemic therapy, laboratory, imaging, physician, nursing, and allied health care (all in 2019 Canadian dollars). A six-month time horizon and government payer perspective were used. Consecutive patients aged 65 years or older (n = 152, mean age 82 y) and referred in the pre-treatment setting between July 2016 and June 2018 were included. Treatment plans were modified for 51% of patients. Costs associated with planned treatment were CAD 3,655,015. Costs associated with GA and related interventions were CAD 95,798. Final treatment costs were CAD 2,436,379. Net savings associated with the clinic were CAD 1,122,837, or CAD 7387 per patient seen. Findings were robust in multiple sensitivity analyses. Combined with mounting trial data demonstrating the clinical benefits of GA, our data can inform a strong business case for geriatric oncology clinics in health care environments similar to ours, but additional studies in diverse health care settings are warranted. MDPI 2022-02-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8833958/ /pubmed/35159056 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers14030789 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Alibhai, Shabbir M. H.
Alam, Zuhair
Saluja, Ronak
Malik, Uzair
Warde, Padraig
Jin, Rana
Berger, Arielle
Romanovsky, Lindy
Chan, Kelvin K. W.
Economic Evaluation of a Geriatric Oncology Clinic
title Economic Evaluation of a Geriatric Oncology Clinic
title_full Economic Evaluation of a Geriatric Oncology Clinic
title_fullStr Economic Evaluation of a Geriatric Oncology Clinic
title_full_unstemmed Economic Evaluation of a Geriatric Oncology Clinic
title_short Economic Evaluation of a Geriatric Oncology Clinic
title_sort economic evaluation of a geriatric oncology clinic
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8833958/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35159056
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers14030789
work_keys_str_mv AT alibhaishabbirmh economicevaluationofageriatriconcologyclinic
AT alamzuhair economicevaluationofageriatriconcologyclinic
AT salujaronak economicevaluationofageriatriconcologyclinic
AT malikuzair economicevaluationofageriatriconcologyclinic
AT wardepadraig economicevaluationofageriatriconcologyclinic
AT jinrana economicevaluationofageriatriconcologyclinic
AT bergerarielle economicevaluationofageriatriconcologyclinic
AT romanovskylindy economicevaluationofageriatriconcologyclinic
AT chankelvinkw economicevaluationofageriatriconcologyclinic