Cargando…

Recognition of intraoperative surgical glove perforation: a comparison by surgical role and level of training

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to characterize the risk of glove perforation among surgical team members performing a typical set of trauma procedures, as well as to identify the rate at which these people recognize potential perforations. METHODS: Gloves used in orthopedic trauma room proced...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thomson, Ian, Krysa, Nicole, McGuire, Andrew, Mann, Steve
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: CMA Impact Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8834241/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35135784
http://dx.doi.org/10.1503/cjs.016720
_version_ 1784649138590187520
author Thomson, Ian
Krysa, Nicole
McGuire, Andrew
Mann, Steve
author_facet Thomson, Ian
Krysa, Nicole
McGuire, Andrew
Mann, Steve
author_sort Thomson, Ian
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to characterize the risk of glove perforation among surgical team members performing a typical set of trauma procedures, as well as to identify the rate at which these people recognize potential perforations. METHODS: Gloves used in orthopedic trauma room procedures were collected from all participating team members over 2 weeks and were subsequently examined for perforations. Perforation rates based on glove position, type, wearer and procedure were assessed. RESULTS: Perforations were found in 5.9% of gloves; 4.3% of the perforations were found in outer gloves and 1.6% in inner gloves. Among the outer gloves, 30.7% of the perforations were recognized by the wearer at the time of perforation; none of the inner glove perforations were recognized, even when they were associated with an accompanying outer glove perforation. Significantly more perforations were identified in the gloves of attending staff than in those of other team members. Attending staff experienced more perforations than other wearers, regardless of whether they were acting as the primary surgeon or as an assistant. Perforations were more common in open reduction internal fixation and amputation procedures. For open reduction internal fixation procedures, longer operative times were associated with more frequent glove perforations. CONCLUSION: The rates of glove perforation are high in orthopedic trauma surgeries, and often these perforations are not recognized by the wearer. Attending staff are at an elevated risk of glove perforation. It is recommended that all members of the surgical team change both pairs of gloves whenever an outer glove perforation is observed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8834241
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher CMA Impact Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88342412022-02-12 Recognition of intraoperative surgical glove perforation: a comparison by surgical role and level of training Thomson, Ian Krysa, Nicole McGuire, Andrew Mann, Steve Can J Surg Research BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to characterize the risk of glove perforation among surgical team members performing a typical set of trauma procedures, as well as to identify the rate at which these people recognize potential perforations. METHODS: Gloves used in orthopedic trauma room procedures were collected from all participating team members over 2 weeks and were subsequently examined for perforations. Perforation rates based on glove position, type, wearer and procedure were assessed. RESULTS: Perforations were found in 5.9% of gloves; 4.3% of the perforations were found in outer gloves and 1.6% in inner gloves. Among the outer gloves, 30.7% of the perforations were recognized by the wearer at the time of perforation; none of the inner glove perforations were recognized, even when they were associated with an accompanying outer glove perforation. Significantly more perforations were identified in the gloves of attending staff than in those of other team members. Attending staff experienced more perforations than other wearers, regardless of whether they were acting as the primary surgeon or as an assistant. Perforations were more common in open reduction internal fixation and amputation procedures. For open reduction internal fixation procedures, longer operative times were associated with more frequent glove perforations. CONCLUSION: The rates of glove perforation are high in orthopedic trauma surgeries, and often these perforations are not recognized by the wearer. Attending staff are at an elevated risk of glove perforation. It is recommended that all members of the surgical team change both pairs of gloves whenever an outer glove perforation is observed. CMA Impact Inc. 2022-02-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8834241/ /pubmed/35135784 http://dx.doi.org/10.1503/cjs.016720 Text en © 2022 CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) licence, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original publication is properly cited, the use is noncommercial (i.e., research or educational use), and no modifications or adaptations are made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
spellingShingle Research
Thomson, Ian
Krysa, Nicole
McGuire, Andrew
Mann, Steve
Recognition of intraoperative surgical glove perforation: a comparison by surgical role and level of training
title Recognition of intraoperative surgical glove perforation: a comparison by surgical role and level of training
title_full Recognition of intraoperative surgical glove perforation: a comparison by surgical role and level of training
title_fullStr Recognition of intraoperative surgical glove perforation: a comparison by surgical role and level of training
title_full_unstemmed Recognition of intraoperative surgical glove perforation: a comparison by surgical role and level of training
title_short Recognition of intraoperative surgical glove perforation: a comparison by surgical role and level of training
title_sort recognition of intraoperative surgical glove perforation: a comparison by surgical role and level of training
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8834241/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35135784
http://dx.doi.org/10.1503/cjs.016720
work_keys_str_mv AT thomsonian recognitionofintraoperativesurgicalgloveperforationacomparisonbysurgicalroleandleveloftraining
AT krysanicole recognitionofintraoperativesurgicalgloveperforationacomparisonbysurgicalroleandleveloftraining
AT mcguireandrew recognitionofintraoperativesurgicalgloveperforationacomparisonbysurgicalroleandleveloftraining
AT mannsteve recognitionofintraoperativesurgicalgloveperforationacomparisonbysurgicalroleandleveloftraining