Cargando…
Recognition of intraoperative surgical glove perforation: a comparison by surgical role and level of training
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to characterize the risk of glove perforation among surgical team members performing a typical set of trauma procedures, as well as to identify the rate at which these people recognize potential perforations. METHODS: Gloves used in orthopedic trauma room proced...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
CMA Impact Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8834241/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35135784 http://dx.doi.org/10.1503/cjs.016720 |
_version_ | 1784649138590187520 |
---|---|
author | Thomson, Ian Krysa, Nicole McGuire, Andrew Mann, Steve |
author_facet | Thomson, Ian Krysa, Nicole McGuire, Andrew Mann, Steve |
author_sort | Thomson, Ian |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to characterize the risk of glove perforation among surgical team members performing a typical set of trauma procedures, as well as to identify the rate at which these people recognize potential perforations. METHODS: Gloves used in orthopedic trauma room procedures were collected from all participating team members over 2 weeks and were subsequently examined for perforations. Perforation rates based on glove position, type, wearer and procedure were assessed. RESULTS: Perforations were found in 5.9% of gloves; 4.3% of the perforations were found in outer gloves and 1.6% in inner gloves. Among the outer gloves, 30.7% of the perforations were recognized by the wearer at the time of perforation; none of the inner glove perforations were recognized, even when they were associated with an accompanying outer glove perforation. Significantly more perforations were identified in the gloves of attending staff than in those of other team members. Attending staff experienced more perforations than other wearers, regardless of whether they were acting as the primary surgeon or as an assistant. Perforations were more common in open reduction internal fixation and amputation procedures. For open reduction internal fixation procedures, longer operative times were associated with more frequent glove perforations. CONCLUSION: The rates of glove perforation are high in orthopedic trauma surgeries, and often these perforations are not recognized by the wearer. Attending staff are at an elevated risk of glove perforation. It is recommended that all members of the surgical team change both pairs of gloves whenever an outer glove perforation is observed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8834241 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | CMA Impact Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88342412022-02-12 Recognition of intraoperative surgical glove perforation: a comparison by surgical role and level of training Thomson, Ian Krysa, Nicole McGuire, Andrew Mann, Steve Can J Surg Research BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to characterize the risk of glove perforation among surgical team members performing a typical set of trauma procedures, as well as to identify the rate at which these people recognize potential perforations. METHODS: Gloves used in orthopedic trauma room procedures were collected from all participating team members over 2 weeks and were subsequently examined for perforations. Perforation rates based on glove position, type, wearer and procedure were assessed. RESULTS: Perforations were found in 5.9% of gloves; 4.3% of the perforations were found in outer gloves and 1.6% in inner gloves. Among the outer gloves, 30.7% of the perforations were recognized by the wearer at the time of perforation; none of the inner glove perforations were recognized, even when they were associated with an accompanying outer glove perforation. Significantly more perforations were identified in the gloves of attending staff than in those of other team members. Attending staff experienced more perforations than other wearers, regardless of whether they were acting as the primary surgeon or as an assistant. Perforations were more common in open reduction internal fixation and amputation procedures. For open reduction internal fixation procedures, longer operative times were associated with more frequent glove perforations. CONCLUSION: The rates of glove perforation are high in orthopedic trauma surgeries, and often these perforations are not recognized by the wearer. Attending staff are at an elevated risk of glove perforation. It is recommended that all members of the surgical team change both pairs of gloves whenever an outer glove perforation is observed. CMA Impact Inc. 2022-02-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8834241/ /pubmed/35135784 http://dx.doi.org/10.1503/cjs.016720 Text en © 2022 CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) licence, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original publication is properly cited, the use is noncommercial (i.e., research or educational use), and no modifications or adaptations are made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Research Thomson, Ian Krysa, Nicole McGuire, Andrew Mann, Steve Recognition of intraoperative surgical glove perforation: a comparison by surgical role and level of training |
title | Recognition of intraoperative surgical glove perforation: a comparison by surgical role and level of training |
title_full | Recognition of intraoperative surgical glove perforation: a comparison by surgical role and level of training |
title_fullStr | Recognition of intraoperative surgical glove perforation: a comparison by surgical role and level of training |
title_full_unstemmed | Recognition of intraoperative surgical glove perforation: a comparison by surgical role and level of training |
title_short | Recognition of intraoperative surgical glove perforation: a comparison by surgical role and level of training |
title_sort | recognition of intraoperative surgical glove perforation: a comparison by surgical role and level of training |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8834241/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35135784 http://dx.doi.org/10.1503/cjs.016720 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT thomsonian recognitionofintraoperativesurgicalgloveperforationacomparisonbysurgicalroleandleveloftraining AT krysanicole recognitionofintraoperativesurgicalgloveperforationacomparisonbysurgicalroleandleveloftraining AT mcguireandrew recognitionofintraoperativesurgicalgloveperforationacomparisonbysurgicalroleandleveloftraining AT mannsteve recognitionofintraoperativesurgicalgloveperforationacomparisonbysurgicalroleandleveloftraining |