Cargando…
A Systematic Literature Review of Indoor Air Disinfection Techniques for Airborne Bacterial Respiratory Pathogens
Interrupting the transmission of airborne (<≈5 µm) respiratory pathogens indoors is not a new challenge, but it has attracted unprecedented interest due to the COVID-19 pandemic during 2020–2021. However, bacterial respiratory pathogens with known or potential airborne transmission account for an...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8834760/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35162224 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19031197 |
_version_ | 1784649263256436736 |
---|---|
author | Nguyen, Thi Tham Johnson, Graham R. Bell, Scott C. Knibbs, Luke D. |
author_facet | Nguyen, Thi Tham Johnson, Graham R. Bell, Scott C. Knibbs, Luke D. |
author_sort | Nguyen, Thi Tham |
collection | PubMed |
description | Interrupting the transmission of airborne (<≈5 µm) respiratory pathogens indoors is not a new challenge, but it has attracted unprecedented interest due to the COVID-19 pandemic during 2020–2021. However, bacterial respiratory pathogens with known or potential airborne transmission account for an appreciable proportion of the communicable disease burden globally. We aimed to systematically review quantitative, laboratory-based studies of air disinfection techniques for airborne respiratory bacteria. Three databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus) were searched, following PRISMA guidelines. A total of 9596 articles were identified, of which 517 were assessed in detail and of which 26 met the inclusion and quality assessment criteria. Seven air disinfection techniques, including UV-C light, filtration, and face masks, among others, were applied to 13 different bacterial pathogens. More than 80% of studies suggested that air disinfection techniques were more effective at inactivating or killing bacteria than the comparator or baseline condition. However, it was not possible to compare these techniques because of methodological heterogeneity and the relatively small number of the studies. Laboratory studies are useful for demonstrating proof-of-concept and performance under controlled conditions. However, the generalisability of their findings to person-to-person transmission in real-world settings is unclear for most of the pathogens and techniques we assessed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8834760 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88347602022-02-12 A Systematic Literature Review of Indoor Air Disinfection Techniques for Airborne Bacterial Respiratory Pathogens Nguyen, Thi Tham Johnson, Graham R. Bell, Scott C. Knibbs, Luke D. Int J Environ Res Public Health Systematic Review Interrupting the transmission of airborne (<≈5 µm) respiratory pathogens indoors is not a new challenge, but it has attracted unprecedented interest due to the COVID-19 pandemic during 2020–2021. However, bacterial respiratory pathogens with known or potential airborne transmission account for an appreciable proportion of the communicable disease burden globally. We aimed to systematically review quantitative, laboratory-based studies of air disinfection techniques for airborne respiratory bacteria. Three databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus) were searched, following PRISMA guidelines. A total of 9596 articles were identified, of which 517 were assessed in detail and of which 26 met the inclusion and quality assessment criteria. Seven air disinfection techniques, including UV-C light, filtration, and face masks, among others, were applied to 13 different bacterial pathogens. More than 80% of studies suggested that air disinfection techniques were more effective at inactivating or killing bacteria than the comparator or baseline condition. However, it was not possible to compare these techniques because of methodological heterogeneity and the relatively small number of the studies. Laboratory studies are useful for demonstrating proof-of-concept and performance under controlled conditions. However, the generalisability of their findings to person-to-person transmission in real-world settings is unclear for most of the pathogens and techniques we assessed. MDPI 2022-01-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8834760/ /pubmed/35162224 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19031197 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Systematic Review Nguyen, Thi Tham Johnson, Graham R. Bell, Scott C. Knibbs, Luke D. A Systematic Literature Review of Indoor Air Disinfection Techniques for Airborne Bacterial Respiratory Pathogens |
title | A Systematic Literature Review of Indoor Air Disinfection Techniques for Airborne Bacterial Respiratory Pathogens |
title_full | A Systematic Literature Review of Indoor Air Disinfection Techniques for Airborne Bacterial Respiratory Pathogens |
title_fullStr | A Systematic Literature Review of Indoor Air Disinfection Techniques for Airborne Bacterial Respiratory Pathogens |
title_full_unstemmed | A Systematic Literature Review of Indoor Air Disinfection Techniques for Airborne Bacterial Respiratory Pathogens |
title_short | A Systematic Literature Review of Indoor Air Disinfection Techniques for Airborne Bacterial Respiratory Pathogens |
title_sort | systematic literature review of indoor air disinfection techniques for airborne bacterial respiratory pathogens |
topic | Systematic Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8834760/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35162224 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19031197 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nguyenthitham asystematicliteraturereviewofindoorairdisinfectiontechniquesforairbornebacterialrespiratorypathogens AT johnsongrahamr asystematicliteraturereviewofindoorairdisinfectiontechniquesforairbornebacterialrespiratorypathogens AT bellscottc asystematicliteraturereviewofindoorairdisinfectiontechniquesforairbornebacterialrespiratorypathogens AT knibbsluked asystematicliteraturereviewofindoorairdisinfectiontechniquesforairbornebacterialrespiratorypathogens AT nguyenthitham systematicliteraturereviewofindoorairdisinfectiontechniquesforairbornebacterialrespiratorypathogens AT johnsongrahamr systematicliteraturereviewofindoorairdisinfectiontechniquesforairbornebacterialrespiratorypathogens AT bellscottc systematicliteraturereviewofindoorairdisinfectiontechniquesforairbornebacterialrespiratorypathogens AT knibbsluked systematicliteraturereviewofindoorairdisinfectiontechniquesforairbornebacterialrespiratorypathogens |