Cargando…

A Systematic Literature Review of Indoor Air Disinfection Techniques for Airborne Bacterial Respiratory Pathogens

Interrupting the transmission of airborne (<≈5 µm) respiratory pathogens indoors is not a new challenge, but it has attracted unprecedented interest due to the COVID-19 pandemic during 2020–2021. However, bacterial respiratory pathogens with known or potential airborne transmission account for an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nguyen, Thi Tham, Johnson, Graham R., Bell, Scott C., Knibbs, Luke D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8834760/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35162224
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19031197
_version_ 1784649263256436736
author Nguyen, Thi Tham
Johnson, Graham R.
Bell, Scott C.
Knibbs, Luke D.
author_facet Nguyen, Thi Tham
Johnson, Graham R.
Bell, Scott C.
Knibbs, Luke D.
author_sort Nguyen, Thi Tham
collection PubMed
description Interrupting the transmission of airborne (<≈5 µm) respiratory pathogens indoors is not a new challenge, but it has attracted unprecedented interest due to the COVID-19 pandemic during 2020–2021. However, bacterial respiratory pathogens with known or potential airborne transmission account for an appreciable proportion of the communicable disease burden globally. We aimed to systematically review quantitative, laboratory-based studies of air disinfection techniques for airborne respiratory bacteria. Three databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus) were searched, following PRISMA guidelines. A total of 9596 articles were identified, of which 517 were assessed in detail and of which 26 met the inclusion and quality assessment criteria. Seven air disinfection techniques, including UV-C light, filtration, and face masks, among others, were applied to 13 different bacterial pathogens. More than 80% of studies suggested that air disinfection techniques were more effective at inactivating or killing bacteria than the comparator or baseline condition. However, it was not possible to compare these techniques because of methodological heterogeneity and the relatively small number of the studies. Laboratory studies are useful for demonstrating proof-of-concept and performance under controlled conditions. However, the generalisability of their findings to person-to-person transmission in real-world settings is unclear for most of the pathogens and techniques we assessed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8834760
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88347602022-02-12 A Systematic Literature Review of Indoor Air Disinfection Techniques for Airborne Bacterial Respiratory Pathogens Nguyen, Thi Tham Johnson, Graham R. Bell, Scott C. Knibbs, Luke D. Int J Environ Res Public Health Systematic Review Interrupting the transmission of airborne (<≈5 µm) respiratory pathogens indoors is not a new challenge, but it has attracted unprecedented interest due to the COVID-19 pandemic during 2020–2021. However, bacterial respiratory pathogens with known or potential airborne transmission account for an appreciable proportion of the communicable disease burden globally. We aimed to systematically review quantitative, laboratory-based studies of air disinfection techniques for airborne respiratory bacteria. Three databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus) were searched, following PRISMA guidelines. A total of 9596 articles were identified, of which 517 were assessed in detail and of which 26 met the inclusion and quality assessment criteria. Seven air disinfection techniques, including UV-C light, filtration, and face masks, among others, were applied to 13 different bacterial pathogens. More than 80% of studies suggested that air disinfection techniques were more effective at inactivating or killing bacteria than the comparator or baseline condition. However, it was not possible to compare these techniques because of methodological heterogeneity and the relatively small number of the studies. Laboratory studies are useful for demonstrating proof-of-concept and performance under controlled conditions. However, the generalisability of their findings to person-to-person transmission in real-world settings is unclear for most of the pathogens and techniques we assessed. MDPI 2022-01-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8834760/ /pubmed/35162224 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19031197 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Nguyen, Thi Tham
Johnson, Graham R.
Bell, Scott C.
Knibbs, Luke D.
A Systematic Literature Review of Indoor Air Disinfection Techniques for Airborne Bacterial Respiratory Pathogens
title A Systematic Literature Review of Indoor Air Disinfection Techniques for Airborne Bacterial Respiratory Pathogens
title_full A Systematic Literature Review of Indoor Air Disinfection Techniques for Airborne Bacterial Respiratory Pathogens
title_fullStr A Systematic Literature Review of Indoor Air Disinfection Techniques for Airborne Bacterial Respiratory Pathogens
title_full_unstemmed A Systematic Literature Review of Indoor Air Disinfection Techniques for Airborne Bacterial Respiratory Pathogens
title_short A Systematic Literature Review of Indoor Air Disinfection Techniques for Airborne Bacterial Respiratory Pathogens
title_sort systematic literature review of indoor air disinfection techniques for airborne bacterial respiratory pathogens
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8834760/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35162224
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19031197
work_keys_str_mv AT nguyenthitham asystematicliteraturereviewofindoorairdisinfectiontechniquesforairbornebacterialrespiratorypathogens
AT johnsongrahamr asystematicliteraturereviewofindoorairdisinfectiontechniquesforairbornebacterialrespiratorypathogens
AT bellscottc asystematicliteraturereviewofindoorairdisinfectiontechniquesforairbornebacterialrespiratorypathogens
AT knibbsluked asystematicliteraturereviewofindoorairdisinfectiontechniquesforairbornebacterialrespiratorypathogens
AT nguyenthitham systematicliteraturereviewofindoorairdisinfectiontechniquesforairbornebacterialrespiratorypathogens
AT johnsongrahamr systematicliteraturereviewofindoorairdisinfectiontechniquesforairbornebacterialrespiratorypathogens
AT bellscottc systematicliteraturereviewofindoorairdisinfectiontechniquesforairbornebacterialrespiratorypathogens
AT knibbsluked systematicliteraturereviewofindoorairdisinfectiontechniquesforairbornebacterialrespiratorypathogens