Cargando…
Clinical Selection of Prenatal Diagnostic Techniques Following Positive Noninvasive Prenatal Screening Results in Southwest China
Background: This study aims to evaluate prenatal diagnosis methods following positive noninvasive prenatal screening (NIPS) results. Methods: According to the positive noninvasive prenatal screening results, 926 pregnant women were divided into three groups: main target disease group (high risk for...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8834880/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35154255 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2021.811414 |
_version_ | 1784649292411043840 |
---|---|
author | Jing, Xiaosha Liu, Hongqian Zhu, Qian Liu, Sha Liu, Jianlong Bai, Ting Deng, Cechuan Xia, Tianyu Liu, Yunyun Cheng, Jing Wei, Xiang Xing, Lingling Luo, Yuan Zhou, Quanfang Chen, Lin Li, Lingping Wang, Jiamin |
author_facet | Jing, Xiaosha Liu, Hongqian Zhu, Qian Liu, Sha Liu, Jianlong Bai, Ting Deng, Cechuan Xia, Tianyu Liu, Yunyun Cheng, Jing Wei, Xiang Xing, Lingling Luo, Yuan Zhou, Quanfang Chen, Lin Li, Lingping Wang, Jiamin |
author_sort | Jing, Xiaosha |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: This study aims to evaluate prenatal diagnosis methods following positive noninvasive prenatal screening (NIPS) results. Methods: According to the positive noninvasive prenatal screening results, 926 pregnant women were divided into three groups: main target disease group (high risk for trisomy 21, trisomy 18, or trisomy 13), sex chromosome aneuploidy (SCA) group, and other chromosomal abnormalities group [abnormal Z-scores for chromosomes other than trisomy (T)21/T18/T13 or SCAs]. The verification methods and results were then retrospectively analysed. Results: In the main target disease group, the positive rate of chromosomal abnormalities confirmed by quantitative fluorescence polymerase chain reaction (QF-PCR) was 75.18% (212/282), which was not significantly different from that by karyotyping (79.36%, 173/218) and copy number variation (CNV) detection methods (71.43%, 65/91). The positive rate of additional findings confirmed by karyotyping and copy number variation detection methods in main target disease group was 0.46% (1/218) and 8.79% (8/91), respectively. The positive rate of chromosomal abnormalities confirmed by karyotyping and CNV detection methods were 27.11% (45/166) and 38.46% (95/247) in the SCA group and 4.17% (1/24) and 20% (36/180) in the other chromosomal abnormalities group, respectively. Fetal sex chromosome mosaicism was detected in 16.13% (20/124) of the confirmed SCA cases. There were no significant differences in the detection rates of chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) and CNV sequencing (CNVseq) among the three groups (p > 0.05). Conclusion: QF-PCR can quickly and accurately identify aneuploidies following NIPS-positive results for common aneuploidy, and in combination with karyotyping and CNV detection techniques can provide more comprehensive results. With the NIPS-positive results for SCA or other abnormalities, CMA and CNVseq may have the same effect on increasing the detection rate. The addition of fluorescence in situ hybridization assay may help to identify true fetal mosaicism. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8834880 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88348802022-02-12 Clinical Selection of Prenatal Diagnostic Techniques Following Positive Noninvasive Prenatal Screening Results in Southwest China Jing, Xiaosha Liu, Hongqian Zhu, Qian Liu, Sha Liu, Jianlong Bai, Ting Deng, Cechuan Xia, Tianyu Liu, Yunyun Cheng, Jing Wei, Xiang Xing, Lingling Luo, Yuan Zhou, Quanfang Chen, Lin Li, Lingping Wang, Jiamin Front Genet Genetics Background: This study aims to evaluate prenatal diagnosis methods following positive noninvasive prenatal screening (NIPS) results. Methods: According to the positive noninvasive prenatal screening results, 926 pregnant women were divided into three groups: main target disease group (high risk for trisomy 21, trisomy 18, or trisomy 13), sex chromosome aneuploidy (SCA) group, and other chromosomal abnormalities group [abnormal Z-scores for chromosomes other than trisomy (T)21/T18/T13 or SCAs]. The verification methods and results were then retrospectively analysed. Results: In the main target disease group, the positive rate of chromosomal abnormalities confirmed by quantitative fluorescence polymerase chain reaction (QF-PCR) was 75.18% (212/282), which was not significantly different from that by karyotyping (79.36%, 173/218) and copy number variation (CNV) detection methods (71.43%, 65/91). The positive rate of additional findings confirmed by karyotyping and copy number variation detection methods in main target disease group was 0.46% (1/218) and 8.79% (8/91), respectively. The positive rate of chromosomal abnormalities confirmed by karyotyping and CNV detection methods were 27.11% (45/166) and 38.46% (95/247) in the SCA group and 4.17% (1/24) and 20% (36/180) in the other chromosomal abnormalities group, respectively. Fetal sex chromosome mosaicism was detected in 16.13% (20/124) of the confirmed SCA cases. There were no significant differences in the detection rates of chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) and CNV sequencing (CNVseq) among the three groups (p > 0.05). Conclusion: QF-PCR can quickly and accurately identify aneuploidies following NIPS-positive results for common aneuploidy, and in combination with karyotyping and CNV detection techniques can provide more comprehensive results. With the NIPS-positive results for SCA or other abnormalities, CMA and CNVseq may have the same effect on increasing the detection rate. The addition of fluorescence in situ hybridization assay may help to identify true fetal mosaicism. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-01-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8834880/ /pubmed/35154255 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2021.811414 Text en Copyright © 2022 Jing, Liu, Zhu, Liu, Liu, Bai, Deng, Xia, Liu, Cheng, Wei, Xing, Luo, Zhou, Chen, Li and Wang. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Genetics Jing, Xiaosha Liu, Hongqian Zhu, Qian Liu, Sha Liu, Jianlong Bai, Ting Deng, Cechuan Xia, Tianyu Liu, Yunyun Cheng, Jing Wei, Xiang Xing, Lingling Luo, Yuan Zhou, Quanfang Chen, Lin Li, Lingping Wang, Jiamin Clinical Selection of Prenatal Diagnostic Techniques Following Positive Noninvasive Prenatal Screening Results in Southwest China |
title | Clinical Selection of Prenatal Diagnostic Techniques Following Positive Noninvasive Prenatal Screening Results in Southwest China |
title_full | Clinical Selection of Prenatal Diagnostic Techniques Following Positive Noninvasive Prenatal Screening Results in Southwest China |
title_fullStr | Clinical Selection of Prenatal Diagnostic Techniques Following Positive Noninvasive Prenatal Screening Results in Southwest China |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical Selection of Prenatal Diagnostic Techniques Following Positive Noninvasive Prenatal Screening Results in Southwest China |
title_short | Clinical Selection of Prenatal Diagnostic Techniques Following Positive Noninvasive Prenatal Screening Results in Southwest China |
title_sort | clinical selection of prenatal diagnostic techniques following positive noninvasive prenatal screening results in southwest china |
topic | Genetics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8834880/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35154255 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2021.811414 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jingxiaosha clinicalselectionofprenataldiagnostictechniquesfollowingpositivenoninvasiveprenatalscreeningresultsinsouthwestchina AT liuhongqian clinicalselectionofprenataldiagnostictechniquesfollowingpositivenoninvasiveprenatalscreeningresultsinsouthwestchina AT zhuqian clinicalselectionofprenataldiagnostictechniquesfollowingpositivenoninvasiveprenatalscreeningresultsinsouthwestchina AT liusha clinicalselectionofprenataldiagnostictechniquesfollowingpositivenoninvasiveprenatalscreeningresultsinsouthwestchina AT liujianlong clinicalselectionofprenataldiagnostictechniquesfollowingpositivenoninvasiveprenatalscreeningresultsinsouthwestchina AT baiting clinicalselectionofprenataldiagnostictechniquesfollowingpositivenoninvasiveprenatalscreeningresultsinsouthwestchina AT dengcechuan clinicalselectionofprenataldiagnostictechniquesfollowingpositivenoninvasiveprenatalscreeningresultsinsouthwestchina AT xiatianyu clinicalselectionofprenataldiagnostictechniquesfollowingpositivenoninvasiveprenatalscreeningresultsinsouthwestchina AT liuyunyun clinicalselectionofprenataldiagnostictechniquesfollowingpositivenoninvasiveprenatalscreeningresultsinsouthwestchina AT chengjing clinicalselectionofprenataldiagnostictechniquesfollowingpositivenoninvasiveprenatalscreeningresultsinsouthwestchina AT weixiang clinicalselectionofprenataldiagnostictechniquesfollowingpositivenoninvasiveprenatalscreeningresultsinsouthwestchina AT xinglingling clinicalselectionofprenataldiagnostictechniquesfollowingpositivenoninvasiveprenatalscreeningresultsinsouthwestchina AT luoyuan clinicalselectionofprenataldiagnostictechniquesfollowingpositivenoninvasiveprenatalscreeningresultsinsouthwestchina AT zhouquanfang clinicalselectionofprenataldiagnostictechniquesfollowingpositivenoninvasiveprenatalscreeningresultsinsouthwestchina AT chenlin clinicalselectionofprenataldiagnostictechniquesfollowingpositivenoninvasiveprenatalscreeningresultsinsouthwestchina AT lilingping clinicalselectionofprenataldiagnostictechniquesfollowingpositivenoninvasiveprenatalscreeningresultsinsouthwestchina AT wangjiamin clinicalselectionofprenataldiagnostictechniquesfollowingpositivenoninvasiveprenatalscreeningresultsinsouthwestchina |