Cargando…

Clinical Selection of Prenatal Diagnostic Techniques Following Positive Noninvasive Prenatal Screening Results in Southwest China

Background: This study aims to evaluate prenatal diagnosis methods following positive noninvasive prenatal screening (NIPS) results. Methods: According to the positive noninvasive prenatal screening results, 926 pregnant women were divided into three groups: main target disease group (high risk for...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jing, Xiaosha, Liu, Hongqian, Zhu, Qian, Liu, Sha, Liu, Jianlong, Bai, Ting, Deng, Cechuan, Xia, Tianyu, Liu, Yunyun, Cheng, Jing, Wei, Xiang, Xing, Lingling, Luo, Yuan, Zhou, Quanfang, Chen, Lin, Li, Lingping, Wang, Jiamin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8834880/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35154255
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2021.811414
_version_ 1784649292411043840
author Jing, Xiaosha
Liu, Hongqian
Zhu, Qian
Liu, Sha
Liu, Jianlong
Bai, Ting
Deng, Cechuan
Xia, Tianyu
Liu, Yunyun
Cheng, Jing
Wei, Xiang
Xing, Lingling
Luo, Yuan
Zhou, Quanfang
Chen, Lin
Li, Lingping
Wang, Jiamin
author_facet Jing, Xiaosha
Liu, Hongqian
Zhu, Qian
Liu, Sha
Liu, Jianlong
Bai, Ting
Deng, Cechuan
Xia, Tianyu
Liu, Yunyun
Cheng, Jing
Wei, Xiang
Xing, Lingling
Luo, Yuan
Zhou, Quanfang
Chen, Lin
Li, Lingping
Wang, Jiamin
author_sort Jing, Xiaosha
collection PubMed
description Background: This study aims to evaluate prenatal diagnosis methods following positive noninvasive prenatal screening (NIPS) results. Methods: According to the positive noninvasive prenatal screening results, 926 pregnant women were divided into three groups: main target disease group (high risk for trisomy 21, trisomy 18, or trisomy 13), sex chromosome aneuploidy (SCA) group, and other chromosomal abnormalities group [abnormal Z-scores for chromosomes other than trisomy (T)21/T18/T13 or SCAs]. The verification methods and results were then retrospectively analysed. Results: In the main target disease group, the positive rate of chromosomal abnormalities confirmed by quantitative fluorescence polymerase chain reaction (QF-PCR) was 75.18% (212/282), which was not significantly different from that by karyotyping (79.36%, 173/218) and copy number variation (CNV) detection methods (71.43%, 65/91). The positive rate of additional findings confirmed by karyotyping and copy number variation detection methods in main target disease group was 0.46% (1/218) and 8.79% (8/91), respectively. The positive rate of chromosomal abnormalities confirmed by karyotyping and CNV detection methods were 27.11% (45/166) and 38.46% (95/247) in the SCA group and 4.17% (1/24) and 20% (36/180) in the other chromosomal abnormalities group, respectively. Fetal sex chromosome mosaicism was detected in 16.13% (20/124) of the confirmed SCA cases. There were no significant differences in the detection rates of chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) and CNV sequencing (CNVseq) among the three groups (p > 0.05). Conclusion: QF-PCR can quickly and accurately identify aneuploidies following NIPS-positive results for common aneuploidy, and in combination with karyotyping and CNV detection techniques can provide more comprehensive results. With the NIPS-positive results for SCA or other abnormalities, CMA and CNVseq may have the same effect on increasing the detection rate. The addition of fluorescence in situ hybridization assay may help to identify true fetal mosaicism.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8834880
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88348802022-02-12 Clinical Selection of Prenatal Diagnostic Techniques Following Positive Noninvasive Prenatal Screening Results in Southwest China Jing, Xiaosha Liu, Hongqian Zhu, Qian Liu, Sha Liu, Jianlong Bai, Ting Deng, Cechuan Xia, Tianyu Liu, Yunyun Cheng, Jing Wei, Xiang Xing, Lingling Luo, Yuan Zhou, Quanfang Chen, Lin Li, Lingping Wang, Jiamin Front Genet Genetics Background: This study aims to evaluate prenatal diagnosis methods following positive noninvasive prenatal screening (NIPS) results. Methods: According to the positive noninvasive prenatal screening results, 926 pregnant women were divided into three groups: main target disease group (high risk for trisomy 21, trisomy 18, or trisomy 13), sex chromosome aneuploidy (SCA) group, and other chromosomal abnormalities group [abnormal Z-scores for chromosomes other than trisomy (T)21/T18/T13 or SCAs]. The verification methods and results were then retrospectively analysed. Results: In the main target disease group, the positive rate of chromosomal abnormalities confirmed by quantitative fluorescence polymerase chain reaction (QF-PCR) was 75.18% (212/282), which was not significantly different from that by karyotyping (79.36%, 173/218) and copy number variation (CNV) detection methods (71.43%, 65/91). The positive rate of additional findings confirmed by karyotyping and copy number variation detection methods in main target disease group was 0.46% (1/218) and 8.79% (8/91), respectively. The positive rate of chromosomal abnormalities confirmed by karyotyping and CNV detection methods were 27.11% (45/166) and 38.46% (95/247) in the SCA group and 4.17% (1/24) and 20% (36/180) in the other chromosomal abnormalities group, respectively. Fetal sex chromosome mosaicism was detected in 16.13% (20/124) of the confirmed SCA cases. There were no significant differences in the detection rates of chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) and CNV sequencing (CNVseq) among the three groups (p > 0.05). Conclusion: QF-PCR can quickly and accurately identify aneuploidies following NIPS-positive results for common aneuploidy, and in combination with karyotyping and CNV detection techniques can provide more comprehensive results. With the NIPS-positive results for SCA or other abnormalities, CMA and CNVseq may have the same effect on increasing the detection rate. The addition of fluorescence in situ hybridization assay may help to identify true fetal mosaicism. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-01-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8834880/ /pubmed/35154255 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2021.811414 Text en Copyright © 2022 Jing, Liu, Zhu, Liu, Liu, Bai, Deng, Xia, Liu, Cheng, Wei, Xing, Luo, Zhou, Chen, Li and Wang. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Genetics
Jing, Xiaosha
Liu, Hongqian
Zhu, Qian
Liu, Sha
Liu, Jianlong
Bai, Ting
Deng, Cechuan
Xia, Tianyu
Liu, Yunyun
Cheng, Jing
Wei, Xiang
Xing, Lingling
Luo, Yuan
Zhou, Quanfang
Chen, Lin
Li, Lingping
Wang, Jiamin
Clinical Selection of Prenatal Diagnostic Techniques Following Positive Noninvasive Prenatal Screening Results in Southwest China
title Clinical Selection of Prenatal Diagnostic Techniques Following Positive Noninvasive Prenatal Screening Results in Southwest China
title_full Clinical Selection of Prenatal Diagnostic Techniques Following Positive Noninvasive Prenatal Screening Results in Southwest China
title_fullStr Clinical Selection of Prenatal Diagnostic Techniques Following Positive Noninvasive Prenatal Screening Results in Southwest China
title_full_unstemmed Clinical Selection of Prenatal Diagnostic Techniques Following Positive Noninvasive Prenatal Screening Results in Southwest China
title_short Clinical Selection of Prenatal Diagnostic Techniques Following Positive Noninvasive Prenatal Screening Results in Southwest China
title_sort clinical selection of prenatal diagnostic techniques following positive noninvasive prenatal screening results in southwest china
topic Genetics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8834880/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35154255
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2021.811414
work_keys_str_mv AT jingxiaosha clinicalselectionofprenataldiagnostictechniquesfollowingpositivenoninvasiveprenatalscreeningresultsinsouthwestchina
AT liuhongqian clinicalselectionofprenataldiagnostictechniquesfollowingpositivenoninvasiveprenatalscreeningresultsinsouthwestchina
AT zhuqian clinicalselectionofprenataldiagnostictechniquesfollowingpositivenoninvasiveprenatalscreeningresultsinsouthwestchina
AT liusha clinicalselectionofprenataldiagnostictechniquesfollowingpositivenoninvasiveprenatalscreeningresultsinsouthwestchina
AT liujianlong clinicalselectionofprenataldiagnostictechniquesfollowingpositivenoninvasiveprenatalscreeningresultsinsouthwestchina
AT baiting clinicalselectionofprenataldiagnostictechniquesfollowingpositivenoninvasiveprenatalscreeningresultsinsouthwestchina
AT dengcechuan clinicalselectionofprenataldiagnostictechniquesfollowingpositivenoninvasiveprenatalscreeningresultsinsouthwestchina
AT xiatianyu clinicalselectionofprenataldiagnostictechniquesfollowingpositivenoninvasiveprenatalscreeningresultsinsouthwestchina
AT liuyunyun clinicalselectionofprenataldiagnostictechniquesfollowingpositivenoninvasiveprenatalscreeningresultsinsouthwestchina
AT chengjing clinicalselectionofprenataldiagnostictechniquesfollowingpositivenoninvasiveprenatalscreeningresultsinsouthwestchina
AT weixiang clinicalselectionofprenataldiagnostictechniquesfollowingpositivenoninvasiveprenatalscreeningresultsinsouthwestchina
AT xinglingling clinicalselectionofprenataldiagnostictechniquesfollowingpositivenoninvasiveprenatalscreeningresultsinsouthwestchina
AT luoyuan clinicalselectionofprenataldiagnostictechniquesfollowingpositivenoninvasiveprenatalscreeningresultsinsouthwestchina
AT zhouquanfang clinicalselectionofprenataldiagnostictechniquesfollowingpositivenoninvasiveprenatalscreeningresultsinsouthwestchina
AT chenlin clinicalselectionofprenataldiagnostictechniquesfollowingpositivenoninvasiveprenatalscreeningresultsinsouthwestchina
AT lilingping clinicalselectionofprenataldiagnostictechniquesfollowingpositivenoninvasiveprenatalscreeningresultsinsouthwestchina
AT wangjiamin clinicalselectionofprenataldiagnostictechniquesfollowingpositivenoninvasiveprenatalscreeningresultsinsouthwestchina