Cargando…

Minds and Brains, Sleep and Psychiatry

OBJECTIVE: This article offers a philosophical thesis for psychiatric disorders that rests upon some simple truths about the mind and brain. Specifically, it asks whether the dual aspect monism—that emerges from sleep research and theoretical neurobiology—can be applied to pathophysiology and psycho...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hobson, J. Allan, Gott, Jarrod A., Friston, Karl J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8834904/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35174319
http://dx.doi.org/10.1176/appi.prcp.20200023
_version_ 1784649298105860096
author Hobson, J. Allan
Gott, Jarrod A.
Friston, Karl J.
author_facet Hobson, J. Allan
Gott, Jarrod A.
Friston, Karl J.
author_sort Hobson, J. Allan
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: This article offers a philosophical thesis for psychiatric disorders that rests upon some simple truths about the mind and brain. Specifically, it asks whether the dual aspect monism—that emerges from sleep research and theoretical neurobiology—can be applied to pathophysiology and psychopathology in psychiatry. METHODS: Our starting point is that the mind and brain are emergent aspects of the same (neuronal) dynamics; namely, the brain–mind. Our endpoint is that synaptic dysconnection syndromes inherit the same dual aspect; namely, aberrant inference or belief updating on the one hand, and a failure of neuromodulatory synaptic gain control on the other. We start with some basic considerations from sleep research that integrate the phenomenology of dreaming with the neurophysiology of sleep. RESULTS: We then leverage this treatment by treating the brain as an organ of inference. Our particular focus is on the role of precision (i.e., the representation of uncertainty) in belief updating and the accompanying synaptic mechanisms. CONCLUSIONS: Finally, we suggest a dual aspect approach—based upon belief updating (i.e., mind processes) and its neurophysiological implementation (i.e., brain processes)—has a wide explanatory compass for psychiatry and various movement disorders. This approach identifies the kind of pathophysiology that underwrites psychopathology—and points to certain psychotherapeutic and psychopharmacological targets, which may stand in mechanistic relation to each other.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8834904
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88349042022-02-14 Minds and Brains, Sleep and Psychiatry Hobson, J. Allan Gott, Jarrod A. Friston, Karl J. Psychiatr Res Clin Pract Review OBJECTIVE: This article offers a philosophical thesis for psychiatric disorders that rests upon some simple truths about the mind and brain. Specifically, it asks whether the dual aspect monism—that emerges from sleep research and theoretical neurobiology—can be applied to pathophysiology and psychopathology in psychiatry. METHODS: Our starting point is that the mind and brain are emergent aspects of the same (neuronal) dynamics; namely, the brain–mind. Our endpoint is that synaptic dysconnection syndromes inherit the same dual aspect; namely, aberrant inference or belief updating on the one hand, and a failure of neuromodulatory synaptic gain control on the other. We start with some basic considerations from sleep research that integrate the phenomenology of dreaming with the neurophysiology of sleep. RESULTS: We then leverage this treatment by treating the brain as an organ of inference. Our particular focus is on the role of precision (i.e., the representation of uncertainty) in belief updating and the accompanying synaptic mechanisms. CONCLUSIONS: Finally, we suggest a dual aspect approach—based upon belief updating (i.e., mind processes) and its neurophysiological implementation (i.e., brain processes)—has a wide explanatory compass for psychiatry and various movement disorders. This approach identifies the kind of pathophysiology that underwrites psychopathology—and points to certain psychotherapeutic and psychopharmacological targets, which may stand in mechanistic relation to each other. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-11-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8834904/ /pubmed/35174319 http://dx.doi.org/10.1176/appi.prcp.20200023 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Psychiatric Research and Clinical Practice published by Wiley Periodicals, LLC on behalf of the American Psychiatric Association https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
Hobson, J. Allan
Gott, Jarrod A.
Friston, Karl J.
Minds and Brains, Sleep and Psychiatry
title Minds and Brains, Sleep and Psychiatry
title_full Minds and Brains, Sleep and Psychiatry
title_fullStr Minds and Brains, Sleep and Psychiatry
title_full_unstemmed Minds and Brains, Sleep and Psychiatry
title_short Minds and Brains, Sleep and Psychiatry
title_sort minds and brains, sleep and psychiatry
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8834904/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35174319
http://dx.doi.org/10.1176/appi.prcp.20200023
work_keys_str_mv AT hobsonjallan mindsandbrainssleepandpsychiatry
AT gottjarroda mindsandbrainssleepandpsychiatry
AT fristonkarlj mindsandbrainssleepandpsychiatry