Cargando…
A Cross-Sectional Survey of Labor Pain Control and Women’s Satisfaction
Introduction: Pain experienced during labor is a symptom of contractile activity and is a physiological feature of the uterus that occurs at the appropriate stages of labor. For the majority of women, labor pain is the most severe pain they will ever experience, and therefore should be relieved. Obj...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8835069/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35162764 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19031741 |
_version_ | 1784649339124056064 |
---|---|
author | Pietrzak, Jakub Mędrzycka-Dąbrowska, Wioletta Tomaszek, Lucyna Grzybowska, Magdalena Emilia |
author_facet | Pietrzak, Jakub Mędrzycka-Dąbrowska, Wioletta Tomaszek, Lucyna Grzybowska, Magdalena Emilia |
author_sort | Pietrzak, Jakub |
collection | PubMed |
description | Introduction: Pain experienced during labor is a symptom of contractile activity and is a physiological feature of the uterus that occurs at the appropriate stages of labor. For the majority of women, labor pain is the most severe pain they will ever experience, and therefore should be relieved. Objective: (1) To evaluate labor pain intensity before and after using non-pharmacological and pharmacological interventions; (2) to assess women’s satisfaction of labor pain management. Methods: A multicenter cross-sectional survey study was performed on 500 women who gave birth in different reference level hospitals (i.e., I, II, III). Pain intensity was assessed according the Numeric Rating Scale (range 0–10), whereas women’s satisfaction was measured with a 5 point Likert scale. Results: The use of both non-pharmacological (median 6.7 (5; 8) vs. 4.5 (3.3; 5.5)) and pharmacological methods (median 8 (7; 9) vs. 5 (3; 6)) resulted in a significant reduction in pain (p < 0.01). Water immersion and epidural anesthesia proved to be the most effective non-pharmacological and pharmacological methods, respectively. In hospitals of reference I, analgesic management was based primarily on the use of non-pharmacological techniques, less often mixed, i.e., non-pharmacological and pharmacological techniques (27.5%). On the other hand, in hospitals with higher referentiality, mixed methods were used more often (level II—65.8%; level III—81.2%). Pain intensity was significantly higher (p < 0.0001) in hospitals with reference level I (median 5 (4; 6)) than in the hospitals with reference level II (median 4.2 (3; 5)) or level III (median 4.2 (3.3; 5.4)). Epidural anesthesia was most often performed (60%) in the hospital of reference II. Women’s satisfaction (median 4 (3; 5)), inter alia, was associated with the effectiveness of applied methods. Conclusions: The study findings suggest that women giving birth in hospitals of higher referentiality have better control of labor pain due to access to pharmacological methods. Epidural anesthesia remains the gold standard for relieving labor pain. The choice of a specific method is determined by the degree of hospital and associated with the pain referentiality. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8835069 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88350692022-02-12 A Cross-Sectional Survey of Labor Pain Control and Women’s Satisfaction Pietrzak, Jakub Mędrzycka-Dąbrowska, Wioletta Tomaszek, Lucyna Grzybowska, Magdalena Emilia Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Introduction: Pain experienced during labor is a symptom of contractile activity and is a physiological feature of the uterus that occurs at the appropriate stages of labor. For the majority of women, labor pain is the most severe pain they will ever experience, and therefore should be relieved. Objective: (1) To evaluate labor pain intensity before and after using non-pharmacological and pharmacological interventions; (2) to assess women’s satisfaction of labor pain management. Methods: A multicenter cross-sectional survey study was performed on 500 women who gave birth in different reference level hospitals (i.e., I, II, III). Pain intensity was assessed according the Numeric Rating Scale (range 0–10), whereas women’s satisfaction was measured with a 5 point Likert scale. Results: The use of both non-pharmacological (median 6.7 (5; 8) vs. 4.5 (3.3; 5.5)) and pharmacological methods (median 8 (7; 9) vs. 5 (3; 6)) resulted in a significant reduction in pain (p < 0.01). Water immersion and epidural anesthesia proved to be the most effective non-pharmacological and pharmacological methods, respectively. In hospitals of reference I, analgesic management was based primarily on the use of non-pharmacological techniques, less often mixed, i.e., non-pharmacological and pharmacological techniques (27.5%). On the other hand, in hospitals with higher referentiality, mixed methods were used more often (level II—65.8%; level III—81.2%). Pain intensity was significantly higher (p < 0.0001) in hospitals with reference level I (median 5 (4; 6)) than in the hospitals with reference level II (median 4.2 (3; 5)) or level III (median 4.2 (3.3; 5.4)). Epidural anesthesia was most often performed (60%) in the hospital of reference II. Women’s satisfaction (median 4 (3; 5)), inter alia, was associated with the effectiveness of applied methods. Conclusions: The study findings suggest that women giving birth in hospitals of higher referentiality have better control of labor pain due to access to pharmacological methods. Epidural anesthesia remains the gold standard for relieving labor pain. The choice of a specific method is determined by the degree of hospital and associated with the pain referentiality. MDPI 2022-02-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8835069/ /pubmed/35162764 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19031741 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Pietrzak, Jakub Mędrzycka-Dąbrowska, Wioletta Tomaszek, Lucyna Grzybowska, Magdalena Emilia A Cross-Sectional Survey of Labor Pain Control and Women’s Satisfaction |
title | A Cross-Sectional Survey of Labor Pain Control and Women’s Satisfaction |
title_full | A Cross-Sectional Survey of Labor Pain Control and Women’s Satisfaction |
title_fullStr | A Cross-Sectional Survey of Labor Pain Control and Women’s Satisfaction |
title_full_unstemmed | A Cross-Sectional Survey of Labor Pain Control and Women’s Satisfaction |
title_short | A Cross-Sectional Survey of Labor Pain Control and Women’s Satisfaction |
title_sort | cross-sectional survey of labor pain control and women’s satisfaction |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8835069/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35162764 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19031741 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pietrzakjakub acrosssectionalsurveyoflaborpaincontrolandwomenssatisfaction AT medrzyckadabrowskawioletta acrosssectionalsurveyoflaborpaincontrolandwomenssatisfaction AT tomaszeklucyna acrosssectionalsurveyoflaborpaincontrolandwomenssatisfaction AT grzybowskamagdalenaemilia acrosssectionalsurveyoflaborpaincontrolandwomenssatisfaction AT pietrzakjakub crosssectionalsurveyoflaborpaincontrolandwomenssatisfaction AT medrzyckadabrowskawioletta crosssectionalsurveyoflaborpaincontrolandwomenssatisfaction AT tomaszeklucyna crosssectionalsurveyoflaborpaincontrolandwomenssatisfaction AT grzybowskamagdalenaemilia crosssectionalsurveyoflaborpaincontrolandwomenssatisfaction |