Cargando…

A Cross-Sectional Survey of Labor Pain Control and Women’s Satisfaction

Introduction: Pain experienced during labor is a symptom of contractile activity and is a physiological feature of the uterus that occurs at the appropriate stages of labor. For the majority of women, labor pain is the most severe pain they will ever experience, and therefore should be relieved. Obj...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pietrzak, Jakub, Mędrzycka-Dąbrowska, Wioletta, Tomaszek, Lucyna, Grzybowska, Magdalena Emilia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8835069/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35162764
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19031741
_version_ 1784649339124056064
author Pietrzak, Jakub
Mędrzycka-Dąbrowska, Wioletta
Tomaszek, Lucyna
Grzybowska, Magdalena Emilia
author_facet Pietrzak, Jakub
Mędrzycka-Dąbrowska, Wioletta
Tomaszek, Lucyna
Grzybowska, Magdalena Emilia
author_sort Pietrzak, Jakub
collection PubMed
description Introduction: Pain experienced during labor is a symptom of contractile activity and is a physiological feature of the uterus that occurs at the appropriate stages of labor. For the majority of women, labor pain is the most severe pain they will ever experience, and therefore should be relieved. Objective: (1) To evaluate labor pain intensity before and after using non-pharmacological and pharmacological interventions; (2) to assess women’s satisfaction of labor pain management. Methods: A multicenter cross-sectional survey study was performed on 500 women who gave birth in different reference level hospitals (i.e., I, II, III). Pain intensity was assessed according the Numeric Rating Scale (range 0–10), whereas women’s satisfaction was measured with a 5 point Likert scale. Results: The use of both non-pharmacological (median 6.7 (5; 8) vs. 4.5 (3.3; 5.5)) and pharmacological methods (median 8 (7; 9) vs. 5 (3; 6)) resulted in a significant reduction in pain (p < 0.01). Water immersion and epidural anesthesia proved to be the most effective non-pharmacological and pharmacological methods, respectively. In hospitals of reference I, analgesic management was based primarily on the use of non-pharmacological techniques, less often mixed, i.e., non-pharmacological and pharmacological techniques (27.5%). On the other hand, in hospitals with higher referentiality, mixed methods were used more often (level II—65.8%; level III—81.2%). Pain intensity was significantly higher (p < 0.0001) in hospitals with reference level I (median 5 (4; 6)) than in the hospitals with reference level II (median 4.2 (3; 5)) or level III (median 4.2 (3.3; 5.4)). Epidural anesthesia was most often performed (60%) in the hospital of reference II. Women’s satisfaction (median 4 (3; 5)), inter alia, was associated with the effectiveness of applied methods. Conclusions: The study findings suggest that women giving birth in hospitals of higher referentiality have better control of labor pain due to access to pharmacological methods. Epidural anesthesia remains the gold standard for relieving labor pain. The choice of a specific method is determined by the degree of hospital and associated with the pain referentiality.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8835069
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88350692022-02-12 A Cross-Sectional Survey of Labor Pain Control and Women’s Satisfaction Pietrzak, Jakub Mędrzycka-Dąbrowska, Wioletta Tomaszek, Lucyna Grzybowska, Magdalena Emilia Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Introduction: Pain experienced during labor is a symptom of contractile activity and is a physiological feature of the uterus that occurs at the appropriate stages of labor. For the majority of women, labor pain is the most severe pain they will ever experience, and therefore should be relieved. Objective: (1) To evaluate labor pain intensity before and after using non-pharmacological and pharmacological interventions; (2) to assess women’s satisfaction of labor pain management. Methods: A multicenter cross-sectional survey study was performed on 500 women who gave birth in different reference level hospitals (i.e., I, II, III). Pain intensity was assessed according the Numeric Rating Scale (range 0–10), whereas women’s satisfaction was measured with a 5 point Likert scale. Results: The use of both non-pharmacological (median 6.7 (5; 8) vs. 4.5 (3.3; 5.5)) and pharmacological methods (median 8 (7; 9) vs. 5 (3; 6)) resulted in a significant reduction in pain (p < 0.01). Water immersion and epidural anesthesia proved to be the most effective non-pharmacological and pharmacological methods, respectively. In hospitals of reference I, analgesic management was based primarily on the use of non-pharmacological techniques, less often mixed, i.e., non-pharmacological and pharmacological techniques (27.5%). On the other hand, in hospitals with higher referentiality, mixed methods were used more often (level II—65.8%; level III—81.2%). Pain intensity was significantly higher (p < 0.0001) in hospitals with reference level I (median 5 (4; 6)) than in the hospitals with reference level II (median 4.2 (3; 5)) or level III (median 4.2 (3.3; 5.4)). Epidural anesthesia was most often performed (60%) in the hospital of reference II. Women’s satisfaction (median 4 (3; 5)), inter alia, was associated with the effectiveness of applied methods. Conclusions: The study findings suggest that women giving birth in hospitals of higher referentiality have better control of labor pain due to access to pharmacological methods. Epidural anesthesia remains the gold standard for relieving labor pain. The choice of a specific method is determined by the degree of hospital and associated with the pain referentiality. MDPI 2022-02-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8835069/ /pubmed/35162764 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19031741 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Pietrzak, Jakub
Mędrzycka-Dąbrowska, Wioletta
Tomaszek, Lucyna
Grzybowska, Magdalena Emilia
A Cross-Sectional Survey of Labor Pain Control and Women’s Satisfaction
title A Cross-Sectional Survey of Labor Pain Control and Women’s Satisfaction
title_full A Cross-Sectional Survey of Labor Pain Control and Women’s Satisfaction
title_fullStr A Cross-Sectional Survey of Labor Pain Control and Women’s Satisfaction
title_full_unstemmed A Cross-Sectional Survey of Labor Pain Control and Women’s Satisfaction
title_short A Cross-Sectional Survey of Labor Pain Control and Women’s Satisfaction
title_sort cross-sectional survey of labor pain control and women’s satisfaction
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8835069/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35162764
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19031741
work_keys_str_mv AT pietrzakjakub acrosssectionalsurveyoflaborpaincontrolandwomenssatisfaction
AT medrzyckadabrowskawioletta acrosssectionalsurveyoflaborpaincontrolandwomenssatisfaction
AT tomaszeklucyna acrosssectionalsurveyoflaborpaincontrolandwomenssatisfaction
AT grzybowskamagdalenaemilia acrosssectionalsurveyoflaborpaincontrolandwomenssatisfaction
AT pietrzakjakub crosssectionalsurveyoflaborpaincontrolandwomenssatisfaction
AT medrzyckadabrowskawioletta crosssectionalsurveyoflaborpaincontrolandwomenssatisfaction
AT tomaszeklucyna crosssectionalsurveyoflaborpaincontrolandwomenssatisfaction
AT grzybowskamagdalenaemilia crosssectionalsurveyoflaborpaincontrolandwomenssatisfaction