Cargando…

Could Self-Reported Body Sizes Be an Alternative Tool for Assessing Breast Cancer Risk in Postmenopausal Women?

Background: The use of self-reported body size as an alternative tool to estimate body weight for health risk assessment is not widely reported, especially in relation to breast cancer. Therefore, we examined the association between breast cancer and body-mass index (BMI) and the usefulness of picto...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Świątkowska, Beata, Szkiela, Marta, Zajdel, Radosław, Kaleta, Dorota
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8835323/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35162831
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19031809
_version_ 1784649404546809856
author Świątkowska, Beata
Szkiela, Marta
Zajdel, Radosław
Kaleta, Dorota
author_facet Świątkowska, Beata
Szkiela, Marta
Zajdel, Radosław
Kaleta, Dorota
author_sort Świątkowska, Beata
collection PubMed
description Background: The use of self-reported body size as an alternative tool to estimate body weight for health risk assessment is not widely reported, especially in relation to breast cancer. Therefore, we examined the association between breast cancer and body-mass index (BMI) and the usefulness of pictograms. Methods: The case–control study was conducted among postmenopausal women from 2015 to 2019. The study involved 151 women with breast cancer and 67 control subjects. Data were collected by a self-reported detailed questionnaire. Results: An increased, 4.13-fold risk of breast cancer (OR = 4.13; 95% CI [1.69, 10.28]) was observed for women with BMI 25.0–29.9 kg/m(2) compared to women with normal BMI (18.5–24.9 kg/m(2)), whereas the association in the case of obese women was not statistically significant. An increased risk of breast cancer was observed for pictogram scores 3–4 (OR = 8.95; 95% CI [3.22, 24.88]) and for the highest level of self-reported body size, pictograms ≥ 5 (OR = 3.20; 95% CI [1.13, 9.09]). Conclusions: The risk of breast cancer is associated with an increased BMI and visual overweigh and obesity. The results suggest that a self-reporting alternative tool can be used to assess the prevalence of overweight/obesity, particularly in situations where no other tools are available.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8835323
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88353232022-02-12 Could Self-Reported Body Sizes Be an Alternative Tool for Assessing Breast Cancer Risk in Postmenopausal Women? Świątkowska, Beata Szkiela, Marta Zajdel, Radosław Kaleta, Dorota Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Background: The use of self-reported body size as an alternative tool to estimate body weight for health risk assessment is not widely reported, especially in relation to breast cancer. Therefore, we examined the association between breast cancer and body-mass index (BMI) and the usefulness of pictograms. Methods: The case–control study was conducted among postmenopausal women from 2015 to 2019. The study involved 151 women with breast cancer and 67 control subjects. Data were collected by a self-reported detailed questionnaire. Results: An increased, 4.13-fold risk of breast cancer (OR = 4.13; 95% CI [1.69, 10.28]) was observed for women with BMI 25.0–29.9 kg/m(2) compared to women with normal BMI (18.5–24.9 kg/m(2)), whereas the association in the case of obese women was not statistically significant. An increased risk of breast cancer was observed for pictogram scores 3–4 (OR = 8.95; 95% CI [3.22, 24.88]) and for the highest level of self-reported body size, pictograms ≥ 5 (OR = 3.20; 95% CI [1.13, 9.09]). Conclusions: The risk of breast cancer is associated with an increased BMI and visual overweigh and obesity. The results suggest that a self-reporting alternative tool can be used to assess the prevalence of overweight/obesity, particularly in situations where no other tools are available. MDPI 2022-02-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8835323/ /pubmed/35162831 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19031809 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Świątkowska, Beata
Szkiela, Marta
Zajdel, Radosław
Kaleta, Dorota
Could Self-Reported Body Sizes Be an Alternative Tool for Assessing Breast Cancer Risk in Postmenopausal Women?
title Could Self-Reported Body Sizes Be an Alternative Tool for Assessing Breast Cancer Risk in Postmenopausal Women?
title_full Could Self-Reported Body Sizes Be an Alternative Tool for Assessing Breast Cancer Risk in Postmenopausal Women?
title_fullStr Could Self-Reported Body Sizes Be an Alternative Tool for Assessing Breast Cancer Risk in Postmenopausal Women?
title_full_unstemmed Could Self-Reported Body Sizes Be an Alternative Tool for Assessing Breast Cancer Risk in Postmenopausal Women?
title_short Could Self-Reported Body Sizes Be an Alternative Tool for Assessing Breast Cancer Risk in Postmenopausal Women?
title_sort could self-reported body sizes be an alternative tool for assessing breast cancer risk in postmenopausal women?
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8835323/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35162831
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19031809
work_keys_str_mv AT swiatkowskabeata couldselfreportedbodysizesbeanalternativetoolforassessingbreastcancerriskinpostmenopausalwomen
AT szkielamarta couldselfreportedbodysizesbeanalternativetoolforassessingbreastcancerriskinpostmenopausalwomen
AT zajdelradosław couldselfreportedbodysizesbeanalternativetoolforassessingbreastcancerriskinpostmenopausalwomen
AT kaletadorota couldselfreportedbodysizesbeanalternativetoolforassessingbreastcancerriskinpostmenopausalwomen