Cargando…
Could Self-Reported Body Sizes Be an Alternative Tool for Assessing Breast Cancer Risk in Postmenopausal Women?
Background: The use of self-reported body size as an alternative tool to estimate body weight for health risk assessment is not widely reported, especially in relation to breast cancer. Therefore, we examined the association between breast cancer and body-mass index (BMI) and the usefulness of picto...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8835323/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35162831 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19031809 |
_version_ | 1784649404546809856 |
---|---|
author | Świątkowska, Beata Szkiela, Marta Zajdel, Radosław Kaleta, Dorota |
author_facet | Świątkowska, Beata Szkiela, Marta Zajdel, Radosław Kaleta, Dorota |
author_sort | Świątkowska, Beata |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: The use of self-reported body size as an alternative tool to estimate body weight for health risk assessment is not widely reported, especially in relation to breast cancer. Therefore, we examined the association between breast cancer and body-mass index (BMI) and the usefulness of pictograms. Methods: The case–control study was conducted among postmenopausal women from 2015 to 2019. The study involved 151 women with breast cancer and 67 control subjects. Data were collected by a self-reported detailed questionnaire. Results: An increased, 4.13-fold risk of breast cancer (OR = 4.13; 95% CI [1.69, 10.28]) was observed for women with BMI 25.0–29.9 kg/m(2) compared to women with normal BMI (18.5–24.9 kg/m(2)), whereas the association in the case of obese women was not statistically significant. An increased risk of breast cancer was observed for pictogram scores 3–4 (OR = 8.95; 95% CI [3.22, 24.88]) and for the highest level of self-reported body size, pictograms ≥ 5 (OR = 3.20; 95% CI [1.13, 9.09]). Conclusions: The risk of breast cancer is associated with an increased BMI and visual overweigh and obesity. The results suggest that a self-reporting alternative tool can be used to assess the prevalence of overweight/obesity, particularly in situations where no other tools are available. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8835323 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88353232022-02-12 Could Self-Reported Body Sizes Be an Alternative Tool for Assessing Breast Cancer Risk in Postmenopausal Women? Świątkowska, Beata Szkiela, Marta Zajdel, Radosław Kaleta, Dorota Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Background: The use of self-reported body size as an alternative tool to estimate body weight for health risk assessment is not widely reported, especially in relation to breast cancer. Therefore, we examined the association between breast cancer and body-mass index (BMI) and the usefulness of pictograms. Methods: The case–control study was conducted among postmenopausal women from 2015 to 2019. The study involved 151 women with breast cancer and 67 control subjects. Data were collected by a self-reported detailed questionnaire. Results: An increased, 4.13-fold risk of breast cancer (OR = 4.13; 95% CI [1.69, 10.28]) was observed for women with BMI 25.0–29.9 kg/m(2) compared to women with normal BMI (18.5–24.9 kg/m(2)), whereas the association in the case of obese women was not statistically significant. An increased risk of breast cancer was observed for pictogram scores 3–4 (OR = 8.95; 95% CI [3.22, 24.88]) and for the highest level of self-reported body size, pictograms ≥ 5 (OR = 3.20; 95% CI [1.13, 9.09]). Conclusions: The risk of breast cancer is associated with an increased BMI and visual overweigh and obesity. The results suggest that a self-reporting alternative tool can be used to assess the prevalence of overweight/obesity, particularly in situations where no other tools are available. MDPI 2022-02-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8835323/ /pubmed/35162831 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19031809 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Świątkowska, Beata Szkiela, Marta Zajdel, Radosław Kaleta, Dorota Could Self-Reported Body Sizes Be an Alternative Tool for Assessing Breast Cancer Risk in Postmenopausal Women? |
title | Could Self-Reported Body Sizes Be an Alternative Tool for Assessing Breast Cancer Risk in Postmenopausal Women? |
title_full | Could Self-Reported Body Sizes Be an Alternative Tool for Assessing Breast Cancer Risk in Postmenopausal Women? |
title_fullStr | Could Self-Reported Body Sizes Be an Alternative Tool for Assessing Breast Cancer Risk in Postmenopausal Women? |
title_full_unstemmed | Could Self-Reported Body Sizes Be an Alternative Tool for Assessing Breast Cancer Risk in Postmenopausal Women? |
title_short | Could Self-Reported Body Sizes Be an Alternative Tool for Assessing Breast Cancer Risk in Postmenopausal Women? |
title_sort | could self-reported body sizes be an alternative tool for assessing breast cancer risk in postmenopausal women? |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8835323/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35162831 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19031809 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT swiatkowskabeata couldselfreportedbodysizesbeanalternativetoolforassessingbreastcancerriskinpostmenopausalwomen AT szkielamarta couldselfreportedbodysizesbeanalternativetoolforassessingbreastcancerriskinpostmenopausalwomen AT zajdelradosław couldselfreportedbodysizesbeanalternativetoolforassessingbreastcancerriskinpostmenopausalwomen AT kaletadorota couldselfreportedbodysizesbeanalternativetoolforassessingbreastcancerriskinpostmenopausalwomen |