Cargando…

Oncological Outcomes of Primary vs. Salvage OPHL Type II: A Systematic Review

Background: Open partial horizontal laryngectomy type II (OPHL type II) has two main aims: oncological radicality and laryngeal preservation. The aim of this review is to define and emphasize the oncological efficacy of OPHL type II, both as primary and salvage surgery, by analyzing the latest liter...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Saraniti, Carmelo, Verro, Barbara, Ciodaro, Francesco, Galletti, Francesco
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8835477/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35162858
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19031837
_version_ 1784649443690151936
author Saraniti, Carmelo
Verro, Barbara
Ciodaro, Francesco
Galletti, Francesco
author_facet Saraniti, Carmelo
Verro, Barbara
Ciodaro, Francesco
Galletti, Francesco
author_sort Saraniti, Carmelo
collection PubMed
description Background: Open partial horizontal laryngectomy type II (OPHL type II) has two main aims: oncological radicality and laryngeal preservation. The aim of this review is to define and emphasize the oncological efficacy of OPHL type II, both as primary and salvage surgery, by analyzing the latest literature. Methods: The research was carried out on Pubmed, Scopus and Web of Science databases, by using strict keywords. Oncological outcomes were evaluated by the following parameters: overall survival, disease-specific survival, disease-free survival, local control, laryngeal preservation, local recurrence. Results: The review included 19 articles divided into three groups: (1) primary OPHL type II, (2) salvage OPHL type II, (3) adjuvant radiotherapy after primary OPHL type II. The articles showed excellent results as far as oncological radicality and organ preservation. Conclusions: This review demonstrated that OPHL type II is useful to obtain oncological radicality both as primary surgery and salvage surgery. Nevertheless, the only criterion that determined the positive outcome and efficacy of this technique is the strict selection of patient and tumor.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8835477
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88354772022-02-12 Oncological Outcomes of Primary vs. Salvage OPHL Type II: A Systematic Review Saraniti, Carmelo Verro, Barbara Ciodaro, Francesco Galletti, Francesco Int J Environ Res Public Health Review Background: Open partial horizontal laryngectomy type II (OPHL type II) has two main aims: oncological radicality and laryngeal preservation. The aim of this review is to define and emphasize the oncological efficacy of OPHL type II, both as primary and salvage surgery, by analyzing the latest literature. Methods: The research was carried out on Pubmed, Scopus and Web of Science databases, by using strict keywords. Oncological outcomes were evaluated by the following parameters: overall survival, disease-specific survival, disease-free survival, local control, laryngeal preservation, local recurrence. Results: The review included 19 articles divided into three groups: (1) primary OPHL type II, (2) salvage OPHL type II, (3) adjuvant radiotherapy after primary OPHL type II. The articles showed excellent results as far as oncological radicality and organ preservation. Conclusions: This review demonstrated that OPHL type II is useful to obtain oncological radicality both as primary surgery and salvage surgery. Nevertheless, the only criterion that determined the positive outcome and efficacy of this technique is the strict selection of patient and tumor. MDPI 2022-02-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8835477/ /pubmed/35162858 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19031837 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Saraniti, Carmelo
Verro, Barbara
Ciodaro, Francesco
Galletti, Francesco
Oncological Outcomes of Primary vs. Salvage OPHL Type II: A Systematic Review
title Oncological Outcomes of Primary vs. Salvage OPHL Type II: A Systematic Review
title_full Oncological Outcomes of Primary vs. Salvage OPHL Type II: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Oncological Outcomes of Primary vs. Salvage OPHL Type II: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Oncological Outcomes of Primary vs. Salvage OPHL Type II: A Systematic Review
title_short Oncological Outcomes of Primary vs. Salvage OPHL Type II: A Systematic Review
title_sort oncological outcomes of primary vs. salvage ophl type ii: a systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8835477/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35162858
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19031837
work_keys_str_mv AT saraniticarmelo oncologicaloutcomesofprimaryvssalvageophltypeiiasystematicreview
AT verrobarbara oncologicaloutcomesofprimaryvssalvageophltypeiiasystematicreview
AT ciodarofrancesco oncologicaloutcomesofprimaryvssalvageophltypeiiasystematicreview
AT gallettifrancesco oncologicaloutcomesofprimaryvssalvageophltypeiiasystematicreview