Cargando…
Oncological Outcomes of Primary vs. Salvage OPHL Type II: A Systematic Review
Background: Open partial horizontal laryngectomy type II (OPHL type II) has two main aims: oncological radicality and laryngeal preservation. The aim of this review is to define and emphasize the oncological efficacy of OPHL type II, both as primary and salvage surgery, by analyzing the latest liter...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8835477/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35162858 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19031837 |
_version_ | 1784649443690151936 |
---|---|
author | Saraniti, Carmelo Verro, Barbara Ciodaro, Francesco Galletti, Francesco |
author_facet | Saraniti, Carmelo Verro, Barbara Ciodaro, Francesco Galletti, Francesco |
author_sort | Saraniti, Carmelo |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Open partial horizontal laryngectomy type II (OPHL type II) has two main aims: oncological radicality and laryngeal preservation. The aim of this review is to define and emphasize the oncological efficacy of OPHL type II, both as primary and salvage surgery, by analyzing the latest literature. Methods: The research was carried out on Pubmed, Scopus and Web of Science databases, by using strict keywords. Oncological outcomes were evaluated by the following parameters: overall survival, disease-specific survival, disease-free survival, local control, laryngeal preservation, local recurrence. Results: The review included 19 articles divided into three groups: (1) primary OPHL type II, (2) salvage OPHL type II, (3) adjuvant radiotherapy after primary OPHL type II. The articles showed excellent results as far as oncological radicality and organ preservation. Conclusions: This review demonstrated that OPHL type II is useful to obtain oncological radicality both as primary surgery and salvage surgery. Nevertheless, the only criterion that determined the positive outcome and efficacy of this technique is the strict selection of patient and tumor. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8835477 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88354772022-02-12 Oncological Outcomes of Primary vs. Salvage OPHL Type II: A Systematic Review Saraniti, Carmelo Verro, Barbara Ciodaro, Francesco Galletti, Francesco Int J Environ Res Public Health Review Background: Open partial horizontal laryngectomy type II (OPHL type II) has two main aims: oncological radicality and laryngeal preservation. The aim of this review is to define and emphasize the oncological efficacy of OPHL type II, both as primary and salvage surgery, by analyzing the latest literature. Methods: The research was carried out on Pubmed, Scopus and Web of Science databases, by using strict keywords. Oncological outcomes were evaluated by the following parameters: overall survival, disease-specific survival, disease-free survival, local control, laryngeal preservation, local recurrence. Results: The review included 19 articles divided into three groups: (1) primary OPHL type II, (2) salvage OPHL type II, (3) adjuvant radiotherapy after primary OPHL type II. The articles showed excellent results as far as oncological radicality and organ preservation. Conclusions: This review demonstrated that OPHL type II is useful to obtain oncological radicality both as primary surgery and salvage surgery. Nevertheless, the only criterion that determined the positive outcome and efficacy of this technique is the strict selection of patient and tumor. MDPI 2022-02-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8835477/ /pubmed/35162858 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19031837 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Saraniti, Carmelo Verro, Barbara Ciodaro, Francesco Galletti, Francesco Oncological Outcomes of Primary vs. Salvage OPHL Type II: A Systematic Review |
title | Oncological Outcomes of Primary vs. Salvage OPHL Type II: A Systematic Review |
title_full | Oncological Outcomes of Primary vs. Salvage OPHL Type II: A Systematic Review |
title_fullStr | Oncological Outcomes of Primary vs. Salvage OPHL Type II: A Systematic Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Oncological Outcomes of Primary vs. Salvage OPHL Type II: A Systematic Review |
title_short | Oncological Outcomes of Primary vs. Salvage OPHL Type II: A Systematic Review |
title_sort | oncological outcomes of primary vs. salvage ophl type ii: a systematic review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8835477/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35162858 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19031837 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT saraniticarmelo oncologicaloutcomesofprimaryvssalvageophltypeiiasystematicreview AT verrobarbara oncologicaloutcomesofprimaryvssalvageophltypeiiasystematicreview AT ciodarofrancesco oncologicaloutcomesofprimaryvssalvageophltypeiiasystematicreview AT gallettifrancesco oncologicaloutcomesofprimaryvssalvageophltypeiiasystematicreview |