Cargando…

Current and Future Perspectives on the COVID-19 Vaccine: A Scientometric Review

This study attempted to draw the present and future perspective of the COVID-19 vaccine by identifying the most important scientists and their scientific contexts, trends of research topics, and relationships between different entities. Methods: To achieve this purpose, bibliometric and scientometri...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Noruzi, Alireza, Gholampour, Behzad, Gholampour, Sajad, Jafari, Somayeh, Farshid, Razieh, Stanek, Agata, Saboury, Ali Akbar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8836413/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35160202
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11030750
_version_ 1784649672765210624
author Noruzi, Alireza
Gholampour, Behzad
Gholampour, Sajad
Jafari, Somayeh
Farshid, Razieh
Stanek, Agata
Saboury, Ali Akbar
author_facet Noruzi, Alireza
Gholampour, Behzad
Gholampour, Sajad
Jafari, Somayeh
Farshid, Razieh
Stanek, Agata
Saboury, Ali Akbar
author_sort Noruzi, Alireza
collection PubMed
description This study attempted to draw the present and future perspective of the COVID-19 vaccine by identifying the most important scientists and their scientific contexts, trends of research topics, and relationships between different entities. Methods: To achieve this purpose, bibliometric and scientometric techniques were used to analyze 6288 scientific documents contributing to COVID-19 vaccines from the beginning of 2019 to 13 December 2021, indexed in the Web of Science. Results: The United States (US) had the greatest impact by publishing 2104 documents and receiving 32,958 citations. The US and the UK countries had the highest level of scientific collaborations with 192 collaborative studies. The University of Oxford and the Harvard Medical School were the most active institutions, and the University of Oxford and Emory University were the most influential institutions. Pollard AJ and Lambe T had the most publications and the highest citations and h-index. T Lambe, SC Gilbert, M Voysey, and AJ Pollard from the University of Oxford had the highest number of co-authorships. More than 19% of the research was conducted in the field of immunology. The Vaccines journal had the most publications, with 425 articles. The US Department of Health & Human Services granted the most research. In 2019, studies were focused on the topics of COVID-19 virus identification and ways to deal with it; in 2020, studies focused on the topics of COVID-19 and vaccines, whereas in 2021, they focused on the topics of COVID-19 vaccines and their effects, vaccines hesitancy, the role of healthcare workers in COVID-19, as well as discussions about these vaccines in the social media. Conclusions: Recognition of the most important actors (countries, institutes, researchers, and channels for the release of COVID-19 vaccine studies), research trends, and fields of study on the COVID-19 vaccine can be useful for researchers, countries, and policy makers in the field of science and health to make decisions and better understand these vaccines.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8836413
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88364132022-02-12 Current and Future Perspectives on the COVID-19 Vaccine: A Scientometric Review Noruzi, Alireza Gholampour, Behzad Gholampour, Sajad Jafari, Somayeh Farshid, Razieh Stanek, Agata Saboury, Ali Akbar J Clin Med Review This study attempted to draw the present and future perspective of the COVID-19 vaccine by identifying the most important scientists and their scientific contexts, trends of research topics, and relationships between different entities. Methods: To achieve this purpose, bibliometric and scientometric techniques were used to analyze 6288 scientific documents contributing to COVID-19 vaccines from the beginning of 2019 to 13 December 2021, indexed in the Web of Science. Results: The United States (US) had the greatest impact by publishing 2104 documents and receiving 32,958 citations. The US and the UK countries had the highest level of scientific collaborations with 192 collaborative studies. The University of Oxford and the Harvard Medical School were the most active institutions, and the University of Oxford and Emory University were the most influential institutions. Pollard AJ and Lambe T had the most publications and the highest citations and h-index. T Lambe, SC Gilbert, M Voysey, and AJ Pollard from the University of Oxford had the highest number of co-authorships. More than 19% of the research was conducted in the field of immunology. The Vaccines journal had the most publications, with 425 articles. The US Department of Health & Human Services granted the most research. In 2019, studies were focused on the topics of COVID-19 virus identification and ways to deal with it; in 2020, studies focused on the topics of COVID-19 and vaccines, whereas in 2021, they focused on the topics of COVID-19 vaccines and their effects, vaccines hesitancy, the role of healthcare workers in COVID-19, as well as discussions about these vaccines in the social media. Conclusions: Recognition of the most important actors (countries, institutes, researchers, and channels for the release of COVID-19 vaccine studies), research trends, and fields of study on the COVID-19 vaccine can be useful for researchers, countries, and policy makers in the field of science and health to make decisions and better understand these vaccines. MDPI 2022-01-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8836413/ /pubmed/35160202 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11030750 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Noruzi, Alireza
Gholampour, Behzad
Gholampour, Sajad
Jafari, Somayeh
Farshid, Razieh
Stanek, Agata
Saboury, Ali Akbar
Current and Future Perspectives on the COVID-19 Vaccine: A Scientometric Review
title Current and Future Perspectives on the COVID-19 Vaccine: A Scientometric Review
title_full Current and Future Perspectives on the COVID-19 Vaccine: A Scientometric Review
title_fullStr Current and Future Perspectives on the COVID-19 Vaccine: A Scientometric Review
title_full_unstemmed Current and Future Perspectives on the COVID-19 Vaccine: A Scientometric Review
title_short Current and Future Perspectives on the COVID-19 Vaccine: A Scientometric Review
title_sort current and future perspectives on the covid-19 vaccine: a scientometric review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8836413/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35160202
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11030750
work_keys_str_mv AT noruzialireza currentandfutureperspectivesonthecovid19vaccineascientometricreview
AT gholampourbehzad currentandfutureperspectivesonthecovid19vaccineascientometricreview
AT gholampoursajad currentandfutureperspectivesonthecovid19vaccineascientometricreview
AT jafarisomayeh currentandfutureperspectivesonthecovid19vaccineascientometricreview
AT farshidrazieh currentandfutureperspectivesonthecovid19vaccineascientometricreview
AT stanekagata currentandfutureperspectivesonthecovid19vaccineascientometricreview
AT sabouryaliakbar currentandfutureperspectivesonthecovid19vaccineascientometricreview