Cargando…
Sedation with Propofol plus Paracetamol in External Cephalic Version: An Observational Study
Although the influence of neuraxial anesthesia or sedation with remifentanil in external cephalic version (ECV) is widely known, ECV results using propofol have not been previously analyzed. This study aimed to evaluate ECV outcomes when propofol was used. An observational analysis of ECV was perfor...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8836497/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35159941 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11030489 |
_version_ | 1784649693889822720 |
---|---|
author | Sánchez-Romero, Javier López-Pérez, Jesús Flores-Muñoz, Ana Belén Méndez-Martínez, María Josefa Araico-Rodríguez, Fernando Mendiola-Olivares, Jaime Blanco-Carnero, José Eliseo Falcón-Araña, Luis Nieto-Díaz, Aníbal Sánchez-Ferrer, María Luisa |
author_facet | Sánchez-Romero, Javier López-Pérez, Jesús Flores-Muñoz, Ana Belén Méndez-Martínez, María Josefa Araico-Rodríguez, Fernando Mendiola-Olivares, Jaime Blanco-Carnero, José Eliseo Falcón-Araña, Luis Nieto-Díaz, Aníbal Sánchez-Ferrer, María Luisa |
author_sort | Sánchez-Romero, Javier |
collection | PubMed |
description | Although the influence of neuraxial anesthesia or sedation with remifentanil in external cephalic version (ECV) is widely known, ECV results using propofol have not been previously analyzed. This study aimed to evaluate ECV outcomes when propofol was used. An observational analysis of ECV was performed between 1 January 2018 and 31 December 2020. ECV was accomplished with tocolysis and propofol. One hundred and thirty-one pregnant women were recruited. The propofol mean dose was 156.1 mg (SD 6.1). A cephalic presentation was achieved in 61.1% (80/131) of the pregnant women. In total, 56.7% (38/67) of pregnant women with cephalic presentation at labor had a spontaneous delivery, 26.9% (18/67) had an operative delivery, and an intrapartum urgent cesarean section was performed in 16.4% (11/67). In total, 46 pregnant women (35.9%) were scheduled for an elective cesarean section due to non-cephalic presentation. The emergency cesarean section rate during the following 24 h was 10.7% (14/131). A major ECV complication arose in 15 cases (11.5%). ECV outcomes when propofol was used seems to be similar to those with other anesthetic adjunct, so sedation with propofol could be an adequate option for ECV. More studies are needed to compare its effectiveness with neuraxial techniques. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8836497 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88364972022-02-12 Sedation with Propofol plus Paracetamol in External Cephalic Version: An Observational Study Sánchez-Romero, Javier López-Pérez, Jesús Flores-Muñoz, Ana Belén Méndez-Martínez, María Josefa Araico-Rodríguez, Fernando Mendiola-Olivares, Jaime Blanco-Carnero, José Eliseo Falcón-Araña, Luis Nieto-Díaz, Aníbal Sánchez-Ferrer, María Luisa J Clin Med Article Although the influence of neuraxial anesthesia or sedation with remifentanil in external cephalic version (ECV) is widely known, ECV results using propofol have not been previously analyzed. This study aimed to evaluate ECV outcomes when propofol was used. An observational analysis of ECV was performed between 1 January 2018 and 31 December 2020. ECV was accomplished with tocolysis and propofol. One hundred and thirty-one pregnant women were recruited. The propofol mean dose was 156.1 mg (SD 6.1). A cephalic presentation was achieved in 61.1% (80/131) of the pregnant women. In total, 56.7% (38/67) of pregnant women with cephalic presentation at labor had a spontaneous delivery, 26.9% (18/67) had an operative delivery, and an intrapartum urgent cesarean section was performed in 16.4% (11/67). In total, 46 pregnant women (35.9%) were scheduled for an elective cesarean section due to non-cephalic presentation. The emergency cesarean section rate during the following 24 h was 10.7% (14/131). A major ECV complication arose in 15 cases (11.5%). ECV outcomes when propofol was used seems to be similar to those with other anesthetic adjunct, so sedation with propofol could be an adequate option for ECV. More studies are needed to compare its effectiveness with neuraxial techniques. MDPI 2022-01-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8836497/ /pubmed/35159941 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11030489 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Sánchez-Romero, Javier López-Pérez, Jesús Flores-Muñoz, Ana Belén Méndez-Martínez, María Josefa Araico-Rodríguez, Fernando Mendiola-Olivares, Jaime Blanco-Carnero, José Eliseo Falcón-Araña, Luis Nieto-Díaz, Aníbal Sánchez-Ferrer, María Luisa Sedation with Propofol plus Paracetamol in External Cephalic Version: An Observational Study |
title | Sedation with Propofol plus Paracetamol in External Cephalic Version: An Observational Study |
title_full | Sedation with Propofol plus Paracetamol in External Cephalic Version: An Observational Study |
title_fullStr | Sedation with Propofol plus Paracetamol in External Cephalic Version: An Observational Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Sedation with Propofol plus Paracetamol in External Cephalic Version: An Observational Study |
title_short | Sedation with Propofol plus Paracetamol in External Cephalic Version: An Observational Study |
title_sort | sedation with propofol plus paracetamol in external cephalic version: an observational study |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8836497/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35159941 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11030489 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sanchezromerojavier sedationwithpropofolplusparacetamolinexternalcephalicversionanobservationalstudy AT lopezperezjesus sedationwithpropofolplusparacetamolinexternalcephalicversionanobservationalstudy AT floresmunozanabelen sedationwithpropofolplusparacetamolinexternalcephalicversionanobservationalstudy AT mendezmartinezmariajosefa sedationwithpropofolplusparacetamolinexternalcephalicversionanobservationalstudy AT araicorodriguezfernando sedationwithpropofolplusparacetamolinexternalcephalicversionanobservationalstudy AT mendiolaolivaresjaime sedationwithpropofolplusparacetamolinexternalcephalicversionanobservationalstudy AT blancocarnerojoseeliseo sedationwithpropofolplusparacetamolinexternalcephalicversionanobservationalstudy AT falconaranaluis sedationwithpropofolplusparacetamolinexternalcephalicversionanobservationalstudy AT nietodiazanibal sedationwithpropofolplusparacetamolinexternalcephalicversionanobservationalstudy AT sanchezferrermarialuisa sedationwithpropofolplusparacetamolinexternalcephalicversionanobservationalstudy |