Cargando…

Sedation with Propofol plus Paracetamol in External Cephalic Version: An Observational Study

Although the influence of neuraxial anesthesia or sedation with remifentanil in external cephalic version (ECV) is widely known, ECV results using propofol have not been previously analyzed. This study aimed to evaluate ECV outcomes when propofol was used. An observational analysis of ECV was perfor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sánchez-Romero, Javier, López-Pérez, Jesús, Flores-Muñoz, Ana Belén, Méndez-Martínez, María Josefa, Araico-Rodríguez, Fernando, Mendiola-Olivares, Jaime, Blanco-Carnero, José Eliseo, Falcón-Araña, Luis, Nieto-Díaz, Aníbal, Sánchez-Ferrer, María Luisa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8836497/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35159941
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11030489
_version_ 1784649693889822720
author Sánchez-Romero, Javier
López-Pérez, Jesús
Flores-Muñoz, Ana Belén
Méndez-Martínez, María Josefa
Araico-Rodríguez, Fernando
Mendiola-Olivares, Jaime
Blanco-Carnero, José Eliseo
Falcón-Araña, Luis
Nieto-Díaz, Aníbal
Sánchez-Ferrer, María Luisa
author_facet Sánchez-Romero, Javier
López-Pérez, Jesús
Flores-Muñoz, Ana Belén
Méndez-Martínez, María Josefa
Araico-Rodríguez, Fernando
Mendiola-Olivares, Jaime
Blanco-Carnero, José Eliseo
Falcón-Araña, Luis
Nieto-Díaz, Aníbal
Sánchez-Ferrer, María Luisa
author_sort Sánchez-Romero, Javier
collection PubMed
description Although the influence of neuraxial anesthesia or sedation with remifentanil in external cephalic version (ECV) is widely known, ECV results using propofol have not been previously analyzed. This study aimed to evaluate ECV outcomes when propofol was used. An observational analysis of ECV was performed between 1 January 2018 and 31 December 2020. ECV was accomplished with tocolysis and propofol. One hundred and thirty-one pregnant women were recruited. The propofol mean dose was 156.1 mg (SD 6.1). A cephalic presentation was achieved in 61.1% (80/131) of the pregnant women. In total, 56.7% (38/67) of pregnant women with cephalic presentation at labor had a spontaneous delivery, 26.9% (18/67) had an operative delivery, and an intrapartum urgent cesarean section was performed in 16.4% (11/67). In total, 46 pregnant women (35.9%) were scheduled for an elective cesarean section due to non-cephalic presentation. The emergency cesarean section rate during the following 24 h was 10.7% (14/131). A major ECV complication arose in 15 cases (11.5%). ECV outcomes when propofol was used seems to be similar to those with other anesthetic adjunct, so sedation with propofol could be an adequate option for ECV. More studies are needed to compare its effectiveness with neuraxial techniques.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8836497
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88364972022-02-12 Sedation with Propofol plus Paracetamol in External Cephalic Version: An Observational Study Sánchez-Romero, Javier López-Pérez, Jesús Flores-Muñoz, Ana Belén Méndez-Martínez, María Josefa Araico-Rodríguez, Fernando Mendiola-Olivares, Jaime Blanco-Carnero, José Eliseo Falcón-Araña, Luis Nieto-Díaz, Aníbal Sánchez-Ferrer, María Luisa J Clin Med Article Although the influence of neuraxial anesthesia or sedation with remifentanil in external cephalic version (ECV) is widely known, ECV results using propofol have not been previously analyzed. This study aimed to evaluate ECV outcomes when propofol was used. An observational analysis of ECV was performed between 1 January 2018 and 31 December 2020. ECV was accomplished with tocolysis and propofol. One hundred and thirty-one pregnant women were recruited. The propofol mean dose was 156.1 mg (SD 6.1). A cephalic presentation was achieved in 61.1% (80/131) of the pregnant women. In total, 56.7% (38/67) of pregnant women with cephalic presentation at labor had a spontaneous delivery, 26.9% (18/67) had an operative delivery, and an intrapartum urgent cesarean section was performed in 16.4% (11/67). In total, 46 pregnant women (35.9%) were scheduled for an elective cesarean section due to non-cephalic presentation. The emergency cesarean section rate during the following 24 h was 10.7% (14/131). A major ECV complication arose in 15 cases (11.5%). ECV outcomes when propofol was used seems to be similar to those with other anesthetic adjunct, so sedation with propofol could be an adequate option for ECV. More studies are needed to compare its effectiveness with neuraxial techniques. MDPI 2022-01-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8836497/ /pubmed/35159941 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11030489 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Sánchez-Romero, Javier
López-Pérez, Jesús
Flores-Muñoz, Ana Belén
Méndez-Martínez, María Josefa
Araico-Rodríguez, Fernando
Mendiola-Olivares, Jaime
Blanco-Carnero, José Eliseo
Falcón-Araña, Luis
Nieto-Díaz, Aníbal
Sánchez-Ferrer, María Luisa
Sedation with Propofol plus Paracetamol in External Cephalic Version: An Observational Study
title Sedation with Propofol plus Paracetamol in External Cephalic Version: An Observational Study
title_full Sedation with Propofol plus Paracetamol in External Cephalic Version: An Observational Study
title_fullStr Sedation with Propofol plus Paracetamol in External Cephalic Version: An Observational Study
title_full_unstemmed Sedation with Propofol plus Paracetamol in External Cephalic Version: An Observational Study
title_short Sedation with Propofol plus Paracetamol in External Cephalic Version: An Observational Study
title_sort sedation with propofol plus paracetamol in external cephalic version: an observational study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8836497/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35159941
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11030489
work_keys_str_mv AT sanchezromerojavier sedationwithpropofolplusparacetamolinexternalcephalicversionanobservationalstudy
AT lopezperezjesus sedationwithpropofolplusparacetamolinexternalcephalicversionanobservationalstudy
AT floresmunozanabelen sedationwithpropofolplusparacetamolinexternalcephalicversionanobservationalstudy
AT mendezmartinezmariajosefa sedationwithpropofolplusparacetamolinexternalcephalicversionanobservationalstudy
AT araicorodriguezfernando sedationwithpropofolplusparacetamolinexternalcephalicversionanobservationalstudy
AT mendiolaolivaresjaime sedationwithpropofolplusparacetamolinexternalcephalicversionanobservationalstudy
AT blancocarnerojoseeliseo sedationwithpropofolplusparacetamolinexternalcephalicversionanobservationalstudy
AT falconaranaluis sedationwithpropofolplusparacetamolinexternalcephalicversionanobservationalstudy
AT nietodiazanibal sedationwithpropofolplusparacetamolinexternalcephalicversionanobservationalstudy
AT sanchezferrermarialuisa sedationwithpropofolplusparacetamolinexternalcephalicversionanobservationalstudy