Cargando…
Short-Term Pain Evolution and Treatment Success of Pulpotomy as Irreversible Pulpitis Permanent Treatment: A Non-Randomized Clinical Study
The objective of this work was to evaluate (1) the short-term evolution of pain and (2) the treatment success of full pulpotomy as permanent treatment of irreversible pulpitis in mature molars. The study consisted of a non-randomized comparison between a test group (n = 44)—full pulpotomy performed...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8836521/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35160239 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11030787 |
_version_ | 1784649699982049280 |
---|---|
author | Beauquis, Julien Setbon, Hugo M. Dassargues, Charles Carsin, Pierre Aryanpour, Sam Van Nieuwenhuysen, Jean-Pierre Leprince, Julian G. |
author_facet | Beauquis, Julien Setbon, Hugo M. Dassargues, Charles Carsin, Pierre Aryanpour, Sam Van Nieuwenhuysen, Jean-Pierre Leprince, Julian G. |
author_sort | Beauquis, Julien |
collection | PubMed |
description | The objective of this work was to evaluate (1) the short-term evolution of pain and (2) the treatment success of full pulpotomy as permanent treatment of irreversible pulpitis in mature molars. The study consisted of a non-randomized comparison between a test group (n = 44)—full pulpotomy performed by non-specialist junior practitioners, and a control group (n = 40)—root canal treatments performed by specialized endodontists. Short-term pain score (Heft–Parker scale) was recorded pre-operatively, then at 24 h and 7 days post-operatively. Three outcomes were considered for treatment success: radiographic, clinical and global success. For short-term evolution of pain, a non-parametric Wilcoxon test was performed (significance level = 0.05). For treatment success, a Pearson Chi square or Fisher test were performed (significance level = 0.017–Bonferroni correction). There was no significant difference between test and control groups neither regarding short term evolution of pain at each time point, nor regarding clinical (80% and 90%, respectively) or global success (77% and 67%, respectively). However, a significant difference in radiographic success was observed (94% and 69%, respectively). The present work adds to the existing literature to support that pulpotomy as permanent treatment could be considered as an acceptable and conservative treatment option, potentially applied by a larger population of dentists. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8836521 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88365212022-02-12 Short-Term Pain Evolution and Treatment Success of Pulpotomy as Irreversible Pulpitis Permanent Treatment: A Non-Randomized Clinical Study Beauquis, Julien Setbon, Hugo M. Dassargues, Charles Carsin, Pierre Aryanpour, Sam Van Nieuwenhuysen, Jean-Pierre Leprince, Julian G. J Clin Med Article The objective of this work was to evaluate (1) the short-term evolution of pain and (2) the treatment success of full pulpotomy as permanent treatment of irreversible pulpitis in mature molars. The study consisted of a non-randomized comparison between a test group (n = 44)—full pulpotomy performed by non-specialist junior practitioners, and a control group (n = 40)—root canal treatments performed by specialized endodontists. Short-term pain score (Heft–Parker scale) was recorded pre-operatively, then at 24 h and 7 days post-operatively. Three outcomes were considered for treatment success: radiographic, clinical and global success. For short-term evolution of pain, a non-parametric Wilcoxon test was performed (significance level = 0.05). For treatment success, a Pearson Chi square or Fisher test were performed (significance level = 0.017–Bonferroni correction). There was no significant difference between test and control groups neither regarding short term evolution of pain at each time point, nor regarding clinical (80% and 90%, respectively) or global success (77% and 67%, respectively). However, a significant difference in radiographic success was observed (94% and 69%, respectively). The present work adds to the existing literature to support that pulpotomy as permanent treatment could be considered as an acceptable and conservative treatment option, potentially applied by a larger population of dentists. MDPI 2022-01-31 /pmc/articles/PMC8836521/ /pubmed/35160239 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11030787 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Beauquis, Julien Setbon, Hugo M. Dassargues, Charles Carsin, Pierre Aryanpour, Sam Van Nieuwenhuysen, Jean-Pierre Leprince, Julian G. Short-Term Pain Evolution and Treatment Success of Pulpotomy as Irreversible Pulpitis Permanent Treatment: A Non-Randomized Clinical Study |
title | Short-Term Pain Evolution and Treatment Success of Pulpotomy as Irreversible Pulpitis Permanent Treatment: A Non-Randomized Clinical Study |
title_full | Short-Term Pain Evolution and Treatment Success of Pulpotomy as Irreversible Pulpitis Permanent Treatment: A Non-Randomized Clinical Study |
title_fullStr | Short-Term Pain Evolution and Treatment Success of Pulpotomy as Irreversible Pulpitis Permanent Treatment: A Non-Randomized Clinical Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Short-Term Pain Evolution and Treatment Success of Pulpotomy as Irreversible Pulpitis Permanent Treatment: A Non-Randomized Clinical Study |
title_short | Short-Term Pain Evolution and Treatment Success of Pulpotomy as Irreversible Pulpitis Permanent Treatment: A Non-Randomized Clinical Study |
title_sort | short-term pain evolution and treatment success of pulpotomy as irreversible pulpitis permanent treatment: a non-randomized clinical study |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8836521/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35160239 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11030787 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT beauquisjulien shorttermpainevolutionandtreatmentsuccessofpulpotomyasirreversiblepulpitispermanenttreatmentanonrandomizedclinicalstudy AT setbonhugom shorttermpainevolutionandtreatmentsuccessofpulpotomyasirreversiblepulpitispermanenttreatmentanonrandomizedclinicalstudy AT dassarguescharles shorttermpainevolutionandtreatmentsuccessofpulpotomyasirreversiblepulpitispermanenttreatmentanonrandomizedclinicalstudy AT carsinpierre shorttermpainevolutionandtreatmentsuccessofpulpotomyasirreversiblepulpitispermanenttreatmentanonrandomizedclinicalstudy AT aryanpoursam shorttermpainevolutionandtreatmentsuccessofpulpotomyasirreversiblepulpitispermanenttreatmentanonrandomizedclinicalstudy AT vannieuwenhuysenjeanpierre shorttermpainevolutionandtreatmentsuccessofpulpotomyasirreversiblepulpitispermanenttreatmentanonrandomizedclinicalstudy AT leprincejuliang shorttermpainevolutionandtreatmentsuccessofpulpotomyasirreversiblepulpitispermanenttreatmentanonrandomizedclinicalstudy |