Cargando…

Short-Term Pain Evolution and Treatment Success of Pulpotomy as Irreversible Pulpitis Permanent Treatment: A Non-Randomized Clinical Study

The objective of this work was to evaluate (1) the short-term evolution of pain and (2) the treatment success of full pulpotomy as permanent treatment of irreversible pulpitis in mature molars. The study consisted of a non-randomized comparison between a test group (n = 44)—full pulpotomy performed...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Beauquis, Julien, Setbon, Hugo M., Dassargues, Charles, Carsin, Pierre, Aryanpour, Sam, Van Nieuwenhuysen, Jean-Pierre, Leprince, Julian G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8836521/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35160239
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11030787
_version_ 1784649699982049280
author Beauquis, Julien
Setbon, Hugo M.
Dassargues, Charles
Carsin, Pierre
Aryanpour, Sam
Van Nieuwenhuysen, Jean-Pierre
Leprince, Julian G.
author_facet Beauquis, Julien
Setbon, Hugo M.
Dassargues, Charles
Carsin, Pierre
Aryanpour, Sam
Van Nieuwenhuysen, Jean-Pierre
Leprince, Julian G.
author_sort Beauquis, Julien
collection PubMed
description The objective of this work was to evaluate (1) the short-term evolution of pain and (2) the treatment success of full pulpotomy as permanent treatment of irreversible pulpitis in mature molars. The study consisted of a non-randomized comparison between a test group (n = 44)—full pulpotomy performed by non-specialist junior practitioners, and a control group (n = 40)—root canal treatments performed by specialized endodontists. Short-term pain score (Heft–Parker scale) was recorded pre-operatively, then at 24 h and 7 days post-operatively. Three outcomes were considered for treatment success: radiographic, clinical and global success. For short-term evolution of pain, a non-parametric Wilcoxon test was performed (significance level = 0.05). For treatment success, a Pearson Chi square or Fisher test were performed (significance level = 0.017–Bonferroni correction). There was no significant difference between test and control groups neither regarding short term evolution of pain at each time point, nor regarding clinical (80% and 90%, respectively) or global success (77% and 67%, respectively). However, a significant difference in radiographic success was observed (94% and 69%, respectively). The present work adds to the existing literature to support that pulpotomy as permanent treatment could be considered as an acceptable and conservative treatment option, potentially applied by a larger population of dentists.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8836521
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88365212022-02-12 Short-Term Pain Evolution and Treatment Success of Pulpotomy as Irreversible Pulpitis Permanent Treatment: A Non-Randomized Clinical Study Beauquis, Julien Setbon, Hugo M. Dassargues, Charles Carsin, Pierre Aryanpour, Sam Van Nieuwenhuysen, Jean-Pierre Leprince, Julian G. J Clin Med Article The objective of this work was to evaluate (1) the short-term evolution of pain and (2) the treatment success of full pulpotomy as permanent treatment of irreversible pulpitis in mature molars. The study consisted of a non-randomized comparison between a test group (n = 44)—full pulpotomy performed by non-specialist junior practitioners, and a control group (n = 40)—root canal treatments performed by specialized endodontists. Short-term pain score (Heft–Parker scale) was recorded pre-operatively, then at 24 h and 7 days post-operatively. Three outcomes were considered for treatment success: radiographic, clinical and global success. For short-term evolution of pain, a non-parametric Wilcoxon test was performed (significance level = 0.05). For treatment success, a Pearson Chi square or Fisher test were performed (significance level = 0.017–Bonferroni correction). There was no significant difference between test and control groups neither regarding short term evolution of pain at each time point, nor regarding clinical (80% and 90%, respectively) or global success (77% and 67%, respectively). However, a significant difference in radiographic success was observed (94% and 69%, respectively). The present work adds to the existing literature to support that pulpotomy as permanent treatment could be considered as an acceptable and conservative treatment option, potentially applied by a larger population of dentists. MDPI 2022-01-31 /pmc/articles/PMC8836521/ /pubmed/35160239 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11030787 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Beauquis, Julien
Setbon, Hugo M.
Dassargues, Charles
Carsin, Pierre
Aryanpour, Sam
Van Nieuwenhuysen, Jean-Pierre
Leprince, Julian G.
Short-Term Pain Evolution and Treatment Success of Pulpotomy as Irreversible Pulpitis Permanent Treatment: A Non-Randomized Clinical Study
title Short-Term Pain Evolution and Treatment Success of Pulpotomy as Irreversible Pulpitis Permanent Treatment: A Non-Randomized Clinical Study
title_full Short-Term Pain Evolution and Treatment Success of Pulpotomy as Irreversible Pulpitis Permanent Treatment: A Non-Randomized Clinical Study
title_fullStr Short-Term Pain Evolution and Treatment Success of Pulpotomy as Irreversible Pulpitis Permanent Treatment: A Non-Randomized Clinical Study
title_full_unstemmed Short-Term Pain Evolution and Treatment Success of Pulpotomy as Irreversible Pulpitis Permanent Treatment: A Non-Randomized Clinical Study
title_short Short-Term Pain Evolution and Treatment Success of Pulpotomy as Irreversible Pulpitis Permanent Treatment: A Non-Randomized Clinical Study
title_sort short-term pain evolution and treatment success of pulpotomy as irreversible pulpitis permanent treatment: a non-randomized clinical study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8836521/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35160239
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11030787
work_keys_str_mv AT beauquisjulien shorttermpainevolutionandtreatmentsuccessofpulpotomyasirreversiblepulpitispermanenttreatmentanonrandomizedclinicalstudy
AT setbonhugom shorttermpainevolutionandtreatmentsuccessofpulpotomyasirreversiblepulpitispermanenttreatmentanonrandomizedclinicalstudy
AT dassarguescharles shorttermpainevolutionandtreatmentsuccessofpulpotomyasirreversiblepulpitispermanenttreatmentanonrandomizedclinicalstudy
AT carsinpierre shorttermpainevolutionandtreatmentsuccessofpulpotomyasirreversiblepulpitispermanenttreatmentanonrandomizedclinicalstudy
AT aryanpoursam shorttermpainevolutionandtreatmentsuccessofpulpotomyasirreversiblepulpitispermanenttreatmentanonrandomizedclinicalstudy
AT vannieuwenhuysenjeanpierre shorttermpainevolutionandtreatmentsuccessofpulpotomyasirreversiblepulpitispermanenttreatmentanonrandomizedclinicalstudy
AT leprincejuliang shorttermpainevolutionandtreatmentsuccessofpulpotomyasirreversiblepulpitispermanenttreatmentanonrandomizedclinicalstudy