Cargando…

In Vitro Accuracy of Digital and Conventional Impressions for Full-Arch Implant-Supported Prostheses

The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of full-arch digital impressions when compared to conventional impressions, when performed on the abutment or implant level. Methods: One resin cast with six implants and another cast with six abutments were scanned with Primescan v5.1 (PS51), Prime...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	D’haese, Rani, Vrombaut, Tom, Roeykens, Herman, Vandeweghe, Stefan
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	MDPI 2022
Materias:	Article
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8836695/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35160045 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11030594

Ejemplares similares

Reliability and Time Efficiency of Digital vs. Analog Bite Registration Technique for the Manufacture of Full-Arch Fixed Implant Prostheses
por: Nuytens, Philippe, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Accuracy of Conventional and Digital Impressions for Full-Arch Implant-Supported Prostheses: An In Vitro Study
por: Drancourt, Noemie, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Accuracy of Guided Implant Surgery in the Edentulous Jaw Using Desktop 3D-Printed Mucosal Supported Guides
por: D’haese, Rani, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Accuracy of Digital and Conventional Full-Arch Impressions in Patients: An Update
por: Schmidt, Alexander, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Comparison of the accuracy of intraoral digital impression system and conventional impression techniques for multiple implants in the full-arch edentulous mandible
por: Farhan, Firas-Abdulameer, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Do digital impressions have a greater accuracy for full-arch implant-supported reconstructions compared to conventional impressions? An in vitro study
por: Shaikh, Mohsin, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Conventional and digital impressions for complete-arch implant-supported fixed prostheses: time, implant quantity effect and patient satisfaction
por: Carneiro Pereira, Ana Larisse, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Accuracy of Conventional and Digital Methods of Obtaining Full-Arch Dental Impression (In Vitro Study)
por: Husein, Hassan A, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

The effect of generation change on the accuracy of full arch digital impressions
por: Schmalzl, Judit, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Comparison of 3D accuracy of three different digital intraoral scanners in full-arch implant impressions
por: Akkal, Ozcan, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Comparison of Milled Full-Arch Implant-Supported Frameworks Realised with a Full Digital Workflow or from Conventional Impression: A Clinical Study
por: Pera, Francesco, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

The effect of framework fabrication technique on the fit accuracy of full arch screw retained implant supported prostheses
por: AlRasheed, Fellwa, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Complications of Fixed Full-Arch Implant-Supported Metal-Ceramic Prostheses
por: Gonzalez-Gonzalez, Ignacio, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Investigation of the Accuracy of Four Intraoral Scanners in Mandibular Full-Arch Digital Implant Impression: A Comparative In Vitro Study
por: Di Fiore, Adolfo, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Trueness of full-arch dental models obtained by digital and conventional impression techniques: an in vivo study
por: Onbasi, Yonca, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

The transfer accuracy of digital and conventional full-arch impressions influenced by fixed orthodontic appliances: a reference aid–based in vitro study
por: Schlenz, Maximiliane Amelie, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Evaluation of Intraoral Full-Arch Scan versus Conventional Preliminary Impression
por: Jánosi, Kinga Mária, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Accuracy of digital impressions versus conventional impressions for 2 implants: an in vitro study evaluating the effect of implant angulation
por: Abduo, Jaafar, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Accuracy of Implant Casts Generated with Conventional and Digital Impressions—An In Vitro Study
por: Ribeiro, Paulo, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Satisfaction and quality of life with palatal positioned implants in severely atrophic maxillae versus conventional implants supporting fixed full-arch prostheses
por: Candel-Marti, Eugenia, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Update on the Accuracy of Conventional and Digital Full-Arch Impressions of Partially Edentulous and Fully Dentate Jaws in Young and Elderly Subjects: A Clinical Trial
por: Schlenz, Maximiliane Amelie, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Conventional versus Digital Impressions for Full Arch Screw-Retained Maxillary Rehabilitations: A Randomized Clinical Trial
por: Cappare, Paolo, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Evaluation of the accuracy of digital and conventional implant-level impression techniques for maxillofacial prosthesis
por: Baghani, Mohammad Taghi, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Accuracy of new implant impression technique using dual arch tray and bite impression coping
por: Lee, Shin-Eon, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Full arch fixed prostheses vs. full arch telescopic-retained retrievable prostheses both supported by implants and natural tooth abutments in periodontally treated patients: Results at 15 years
por: Guarnieri, Renzo, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Influence of Implant Scanbody Wear on the Accuracy of Digital Impression for Complete-Arch: A Randomized In Vitro Trial
por: Arcuri, Lorenzo, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Accuracy of photogrammetry, intraoral scanning, and conventional impression techniques for complete-arch implant rehabilitation: an in vitro comparative study
por: Ma, Bowen, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Electromyographic Evaluation of Muscle Activity in Patients Rehabilitated with Full Arch Fixed Implant-Supported Prostheses
por: Mostovei, Mihail, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

In Vivo Complete-Arch Implant Digital Impressions: Comparison of the Precision of Three Optical Impression Systems
por: Orejas-Perez, Jaime, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Comparison of accuracy between digital and conventional implant impressions: two and three dimensional evaluations
por: Bi, Chuang, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Accuracy of four digital scanners according to scanning strategy in complete-arch impressions
por: Medina-Sotomayor, Priscilla, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Mandibular full-arch fixed prostheses supported by three-dental-implants: A protocol of an overview of reviews
por: Afrashtehfar, Kelvin I., et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Impact of immediately loaded implant-supported maxillary full-arch dental prostheses: a systematic review
por: ABDUNABI, Ahlam, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Palatal positioned implants in severely atrophic maxillae versus conventional implants to support fixed full-arch prostheses: Controlled retrospective study with 5 years of follow-up
por: Candel-Marti, Eugenia, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

In vitro accuracy of digital and conventional impressions in the partially edentulous maxilla
por: Waldecker, Moritz, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Procedure Time and Students' Perception Comparing Full Arch Digital Scans with Conventional Impressions: A Cross-Over Randomized Experimental Trial
por: Alfallaj, Hayam A., et al.
Publicado: (2022)

What to Prefer in Patients with Multibracket Appliances? Digital vs. Conventional Full-Arch Impressions—A Reference Aid-Based In Vivo Study
por: Bock, Niko Christian, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Marginal and Internal Fit of Cobalt-Chromium Fixed Dental Prostheses Generated from Digital and Conventional Impressions
por: Svanborg, Per, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Correction: Accuracy of four digital scanners according to scanning strategy in complete-arch impressions
por: Medina-Sotomayor, Priscilla, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Rehabilitation of Edentulous Jaws with Full-Arch Fixed Implant-Supported Prostheses: An Approach with Short and Ultrashort Implants and Metal-Free Materials
por: Aiuto, Riccardo, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_jg366iuuam9eingpq5b919feqc