Cargando…

Residual errors in visuomotor adaptation persist despite extended motor preparation periods

A consistent finding in sensorimotor adaptation is a persistent undershoot of full compensation, such that performance asymptotes with residual errors greater than seen at baseline. This behavior has been attributed to limiting factors within the implicit adaptation system, which reaches a suboptima...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Weightman, Matthew, Brittain, John-Stuart, Miall, R. Chris, Jenkinson, Ned
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Physiological Society 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8836731/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35044854
http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/jn.00301.2021
_version_ 1784649750692233216
author Weightman, Matthew
Brittain, John-Stuart
Miall, R. Chris
Jenkinson, Ned
author_facet Weightman, Matthew
Brittain, John-Stuart
Miall, R. Chris
Jenkinson, Ned
author_sort Weightman, Matthew
collection PubMed
description A consistent finding in sensorimotor adaptation is a persistent undershoot of full compensation, such that performance asymptotes with residual errors greater than seen at baseline. This behavior has been attributed to limiting factors within the implicit adaptation system, which reaches a suboptimal equilibrium between trial-by-trial learning and forgetting. However, recent research has suggested that allowing longer motor planning periods prior to movement eliminates these residual errors. The additional planning time allows required cognitive processes to be completed before movement onset, thus increasing accuracy. Here, we looked to extend these findings by investigating the relationship between increased motor preparation time and the size of imposed visuomotor rotation (30°, 45°, or 60°), with regard to the final asymptotic level of adaptation. We found that restricting preparation time to 0.35 s impaired adaptation for moderate and larger rotations, resulting in larger residual errors compared to groups with additional preparation time. However, we found that even extended preparation time failed to eliminate persistent errors, regardless of magnitude of cursor rotation. Thus, the asymptote of adaptation was significantly less than the degree of imposed rotation, for all experimental groups. In addition, there was a positive relationship between asymptotic error and implicit retention. These data suggest that a prolonged motor preparation period is insufficient to reliably achieve complete adaptation, and therefore, our results suggest that factors beyond that of planning time contribute to asymptotic adaptation levels. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Residual errors in sensorimotor adaptation are commonly attributed to an equilibrium between trial-by-trial learning and forgetting. Recent research suggested that allowing sufficient time for mental rotation eliminates these errors. In a number of experimental conditions, we show that although restricted motor preparation time does limit adaptation—consistent with mental rotation—extending preparation time fails to eliminate the residual errors in motor adaptation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8836731
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher American Physiological Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88367312022-02-22 Residual errors in visuomotor adaptation persist despite extended motor preparation periods Weightman, Matthew Brittain, John-Stuart Miall, R. Chris Jenkinson, Ned J Neurophysiol Research Article A consistent finding in sensorimotor adaptation is a persistent undershoot of full compensation, such that performance asymptotes with residual errors greater than seen at baseline. This behavior has been attributed to limiting factors within the implicit adaptation system, which reaches a suboptimal equilibrium between trial-by-trial learning and forgetting. However, recent research has suggested that allowing longer motor planning periods prior to movement eliminates these residual errors. The additional planning time allows required cognitive processes to be completed before movement onset, thus increasing accuracy. Here, we looked to extend these findings by investigating the relationship between increased motor preparation time and the size of imposed visuomotor rotation (30°, 45°, or 60°), with regard to the final asymptotic level of adaptation. We found that restricting preparation time to 0.35 s impaired adaptation for moderate and larger rotations, resulting in larger residual errors compared to groups with additional preparation time. However, we found that even extended preparation time failed to eliminate persistent errors, regardless of magnitude of cursor rotation. Thus, the asymptote of adaptation was significantly less than the degree of imposed rotation, for all experimental groups. In addition, there was a positive relationship between asymptotic error and implicit retention. These data suggest that a prolonged motor preparation period is insufficient to reliably achieve complete adaptation, and therefore, our results suggest that factors beyond that of planning time contribute to asymptotic adaptation levels. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Residual errors in sensorimotor adaptation are commonly attributed to an equilibrium between trial-by-trial learning and forgetting. Recent research suggested that allowing sufficient time for mental rotation eliminates these errors. In a number of experimental conditions, we show that although restricted motor preparation time does limit adaptation—consistent with mental rotation—extending preparation time fails to eliminate the residual errors in motor adaptation. American Physiological Society 2022-02-01 2022-01-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8836731/ /pubmed/35044854 http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/jn.00301.2021 Text en Copyright © 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution CC-BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . Published by the American Physiological Society.
spellingShingle Research Article
Weightman, Matthew
Brittain, John-Stuart
Miall, R. Chris
Jenkinson, Ned
Residual errors in visuomotor adaptation persist despite extended motor preparation periods
title Residual errors in visuomotor adaptation persist despite extended motor preparation periods
title_full Residual errors in visuomotor adaptation persist despite extended motor preparation periods
title_fullStr Residual errors in visuomotor adaptation persist despite extended motor preparation periods
title_full_unstemmed Residual errors in visuomotor adaptation persist despite extended motor preparation periods
title_short Residual errors in visuomotor adaptation persist despite extended motor preparation periods
title_sort residual errors in visuomotor adaptation persist despite extended motor preparation periods
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8836731/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35044854
http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/jn.00301.2021
work_keys_str_mv AT weightmanmatthew residualerrorsinvisuomotoradaptationpersistdespiteextendedmotorpreparationperiods
AT brittainjohnstuart residualerrorsinvisuomotoradaptationpersistdespiteextendedmotorpreparationperiods
AT miallrchris residualerrorsinvisuomotoradaptationpersistdespiteextendedmotorpreparationperiods
AT jenkinsonned residualerrorsinvisuomotoradaptationpersistdespiteextendedmotorpreparationperiods