Cargando…

Biomechanical finite element analysis of short-implant-supported, 3-unit, fixed CAD/CAM prostheses in the posterior mandible

OBJECTIVE: To assess the biomechanical effects of different prosthetic/implant configurations and load directions on 3-unit fixed prostheses supported by short dental implants in the posterior mandible using validated 3-D finite element (FE) models. METHODS: Models represented an atrophic mandible,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zupancic Cepic, Lana, Frank, Martin, Reisinger, Andreas, Pahr, Dieter, Zechner, Werner, Schedle, Andreas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8837704/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35147791
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40729-022-00404-8
_version_ 1784649966330839040
author Zupancic Cepic, Lana
Frank, Martin
Reisinger, Andreas
Pahr, Dieter
Zechner, Werner
Schedle, Andreas
author_facet Zupancic Cepic, Lana
Frank, Martin
Reisinger, Andreas
Pahr, Dieter
Zechner, Werner
Schedle, Andreas
author_sort Zupancic Cepic, Lana
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To assess the biomechanical effects of different prosthetic/implant configurations and load directions on 3-unit fixed prostheses supported by short dental implants in the posterior mandible using validated 3-D finite element (FE) models. METHODS: Models represented an atrophic mandible, missing the 2nd premolar, 1st and 2nd molars, and rehabilitated with either two short implants (implant length-IL = 8 mm and 4 mm) supporting a 3-unit dental bridge or three short implants (IL = 8 mm, 6 mm and 4 mm) supporting zirconia prosthesis in splinted or single crowns design. Load simulations were performed in ABAQUS (Dassault Systèmes, France) under axial and oblique (30°) force of 100 N to assess the global stiffness and forces within the implant prosthesis. Local stresses within implant/prosthesis system and strain energy density (SED) within surrounding bone were determined and compared between configurations. RESULTS: The global stiffness was around 1.5 times higher in splinted configurations vs. single crowns, whereby off-axis loading lead to a decrease of 39%. Splinted prostheses exhibited a better stress distribution than single crowns. Local stresses were larger and distributed over a larger area under oblique loads compared to axial load direction. The forces on each implant in the 2-implant-splinted configurations increased by 25% compared to splinted crowns on 3 implants. Loading of un-splinted configurations resulted in increased local SED magnitude. CONCLUSION: Splinting of adjacent short implants in posterior mandible by the prosthetic restoration has a profound effect on the magnitude and distribution of the local stress peaks in peri-implant regions. Replacing each missing tooth with an implant is recommended, whenever bone supply and costs permit.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8837704
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88377042022-02-23 Biomechanical finite element analysis of short-implant-supported, 3-unit, fixed CAD/CAM prostheses in the posterior mandible Zupancic Cepic, Lana Frank, Martin Reisinger, Andreas Pahr, Dieter Zechner, Werner Schedle, Andreas Int J Implant Dent Research OBJECTIVE: To assess the biomechanical effects of different prosthetic/implant configurations and load directions on 3-unit fixed prostheses supported by short dental implants in the posterior mandible using validated 3-D finite element (FE) models. METHODS: Models represented an atrophic mandible, missing the 2nd premolar, 1st and 2nd molars, and rehabilitated with either two short implants (implant length-IL = 8 mm and 4 mm) supporting a 3-unit dental bridge or three short implants (IL = 8 mm, 6 mm and 4 mm) supporting zirconia prosthesis in splinted or single crowns design. Load simulations were performed in ABAQUS (Dassault Systèmes, France) under axial and oblique (30°) force of 100 N to assess the global stiffness and forces within the implant prosthesis. Local stresses within implant/prosthesis system and strain energy density (SED) within surrounding bone were determined and compared between configurations. RESULTS: The global stiffness was around 1.5 times higher in splinted configurations vs. single crowns, whereby off-axis loading lead to a decrease of 39%. Splinted prostheses exhibited a better stress distribution than single crowns. Local stresses were larger and distributed over a larger area under oblique loads compared to axial load direction. The forces on each implant in the 2-implant-splinted configurations increased by 25% compared to splinted crowns on 3 implants. Loading of un-splinted configurations resulted in increased local SED magnitude. CONCLUSION: Splinting of adjacent short implants in posterior mandible by the prosthetic restoration has a profound effect on the magnitude and distribution of the local stress peaks in peri-implant regions. Replacing each missing tooth with an implant is recommended, whenever bone supply and costs permit. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-02-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8837704/ /pubmed/35147791 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40729-022-00404-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research
Zupancic Cepic, Lana
Frank, Martin
Reisinger, Andreas
Pahr, Dieter
Zechner, Werner
Schedle, Andreas
Biomechanical finite element analysis of short-implant-supported, 3-unit, fixed CAD/CAM prostheses in the posterior mandible
title Biomechanical finite element analysis of short-implant-supported, 3-unit, fixed CAD/CAM prostheses in the posterior mandible
title_full Biomechanical finite element analysis of short-implant-supported, 3-unit, fixed CAD/CAM prostheses in the posterior mandible
title_fullStr Biomechanical finite element analysis of short-implant-supported, 3-unit, fixed CAD/CAM prostheses in the posterior mandible
title_full_unstemmed Biomechanical finite element analysis of short-implant-supported, 3-unit, fixed CAD/CAM prostheses in the posterior mandible
title_short Biomechanical finite element analysis of short-implant-supported, 3-unit, fixed CAD/CAM prostheses in the posterior mandible
title_sort biomechanical finite element analysis of short-implant-supported, 3-unit, fixed cad/cam prostheses in the posterior mandible
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8837704/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35147791
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40729-022-00404-8
work_keys_str_mv AT zupanciccepiclana biomechanicalfiniteelementanalysisofshortimplantsupported3unitfixedcadcamprosthesesintheposteriormandible
AT frankmartin biomechanicalfiniteelementanalysisofshortimplantsupported3unitfixedcadcamprosthesesintheposteriormandible
AT reisingerandreas biomechanicalfiniteelementanalysisofshortimplantsupported3unitfixedcadcamprosthesesintheposteriormandible
AT pahrdieter biomechanicalfiniteelementanalysisofshortimplantsupported3unitfixedcadcamprosthesesintheposteriormandible
AT zechnerwerner biomechanicalfiniteelementanalysisofshortimplantsupported3unitfixedcadcamprosthesesintheposteriormandible
AT schedleandreas biomechanicalfiniteelementanalysisofshortimplantsupported3unitfixedcadcamprosthesesintheposteriormandible