Cargando…

The Effects of Cognitive-Based Interventions in Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND: Cognitive-based intervention is divided into three types: Cognitive Stimulation (CS), Cognitive Training (CT), and Cognitive Rehabilitation (CR). This study was conducted to identify systematically the effects of cognitive-based interventions in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) applie...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yun, Sunweon, Ryu, Seang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8837877/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35223620
http://dx.doi.org/10.18502/ijph.v51i1.8286
_version_ 1784649987180724224
author Yun, Sunweon
Ryu, Seang
author_facet Yun, Sunweon
Ryu, Seang
author_sort Yun, Sunweon
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Cognitive-based intervention is divided into three types: Cognitive Stimulation (CS), Cognitive Training (CT), and Cognitive Rehabilitation (CR). This study was conducted to identify systematically the effects of cognitive-based interventions in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) applied to older adults in the following three groups: cognitively healthy, mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and dementia. METHODS: This search was carried out using the Ovid-MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane library, CINAHL, ProQuest, and Korea databases. The effectiveness of the intervention was verified using the CMA 2.0 program. RESULTS: A total of 54 RCTs were included in systematic reviews and 38 studies were analyzed by meta-analysis. Meta-analysis showed that cognitive-based interventions were effective in improving the cognitive function (SMD=0.39, 95% CI=0.32–0.44) of older adults. The subgroup analysis of cognitive function revealed that CT was the most effective in the cognitively healthy (SMD=0.40, 95% CI=0.33–0.46) and the MCI (SMD=0.45, 95% CI=0.27–0.63) groups, and CS was the most effective in the dementia group (SMD=0.57, 95% CI=0.43–0.70). CONCLUSION: In order to improve the cognitive function of older adults in each group, the most effective intervention type needs to be considered first. Evidence on the appropriate type of Cognitive-based intervention will be helpful in nursing practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8837877
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Tehran University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88378772022-02-25 The Effects of Cognitive-Based Interventions in Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Yun, Sunweon Ryu, Seang Iran J Public Health Review Article BACKGROUND: Cognitive-based intervention is divided into three types: Cognitive Stimulation (CS), Cognitive Training (CT), and Cognitive Rehabilitation (CR). This study was conducted to identify systematically the effects of cognitive-based interventions in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) applied to older adults in the following three groups: cognitively healthy, mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and dementia. METHODS: This search was carried out using the Ovid-MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane library, CINAHL, ProQuest, and Korea databases. The effectiveness of the intervention was verified using the CMA 2.0 program. RESULTS: A total of 54 RCTs were included in systematic reviews and 38 studies were analyzed by meta-analysis. Meta-analysis showed that cognitive-based interventions were effective in improving the cognitive function (SMD=0.39, 95% CI=0.32–0.44) of older adults. The subgroup analysis of cognitive function revealed that CT was the most effective in the cognitively healthy (SMD=0.40, 95% CI=0.33–0.46) and the MCI (SMD=0.45, 95% CI=0.27–0.63) groups, and CS was the most effective in the dementia group (SMD=0.57, 95% CI=0.43–0.70). CONCLUSION: In order to improve the cognitive function of older adults in each group, the most effective intervention type needs to be considered first. Evidence on the appropriate type of Cognitive-based intervention will be helpful in nursing practice. Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2022-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8837877/ /pubmed/35223620 http://dx.doi.org/10.18502/ijph.v51i1.8286 Text en Copyright © 2022 Yun et al. Published by Tehran University of Medical Sciences https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/). Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Yun, Sunweon
Ryu, Seang
The Effects of Cognitive-Based Interventions in Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title The Effects of Cognitive-Based Interventions in Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full The Effects of Cognitive-Based Interventions in Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr The Effects of Cognitive-Based Interventions in Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed The Effects of Cognitive-Based Interventions in Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short The Effects of Cognitive-Based Interventions in Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort effects of cognitive-based interventions in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8837877/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35223620
http://dx.doi.org/10.18502/ijph.v51i1.8286
work_keys_str_mv AT yunsunweon theeffectsofcognitivebasedinterventionsinolderadultsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT ryuseang theeffectsofcognitivebasedinterventionsinolderadultsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yunsunweon effectsofcognitivebasedinterventionsinolderadultsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT ryuseang effectsofcognitivebasedinterventionsinolderadultsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis