Cargando…
Experimental Shape Sensing and Load Identification on a Stiffened Panel: A Comparative Study
The monitoring of loads and displacements during service life is proving to be crucial for developing a modern Structural Health Monitoring framework. The continuous monitoring of these physical quantities can provide fundamental information on the actual health status of the structure and can accur...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8837932/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35161812 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22031064 |
_version_ | 1784650000622419968 |
---|---|
author | Esposito, Marco Mattone, Massimiliano Gherlone, Marco |
author_facet | Esposito, Marco Mattone, Massimiliano Gherlone, Marco |
author_sort | Esposito, Marco |
collection | PubMed |
description | The monitoring of loads and displacements during service life is proving to be crucial for developing a modern Structural Health Monitoring framework. The continuous monitoring of these physical quantities can provide fundamental information on the actual health status of the structure and can accurately guide pro-active condition-based maintenance operations, thus reducing the maintenance costs and extending the service life of the monitored structures. Pushed by these needs and by the simultaneous development in the field of strain sensing technologies, several displacement reconstruction and load identification methods have been developed that are based on discrete strain measurements. Among the different formulations, the inverse Finite Element Method (iFEM), the Modal Method (MM) and the 2-step method, the latter being the only one able to also compute the loads together with the displacements, have emerged as the most accurate and reliable ones. In this paper, the formulation of the three methods is summarized in order to set the numerical framework for a comparative study. The three methods are tested on the reconstruction of the external load and of the displacement field of a stiffened aluminium plate starting from experimentally measured strains. A fibre optic sensing system has been used to measure surface strains and an optimization procedure has been performed to provide the best fibre pattern, based on five lines running along the stiffeners’ direction and with a back-to-back measuring scheme. Additional sensors are used to measure the applied force and the plate’s deflection in some locations. The comparison of the results obtained by each method proves the extreme accuracy and reliability of the iFEM in the reconstruction of the deformed shape of the panel. On the other hand, the Modal Method leads to a good reconstruction of the displacements, but also exhibits a sensitivity to the choice of the modes considered for the specific application. Finally, the 2-step approach is able to correctly identify the loads and to reconstruct the displacements with an accuracy that depends on the modeling of the experimental setup. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8837932 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88379322022-02-13 Experimental Shape Sensing and Load Identification on a Stiffened Panel: A Comparative Study Esposito, Marco Mattone, Massimiliano Gherlone, Marco Sensors (Basel) Article The monitoring of loads and displacements during service life is proving to be crucial for developing a modern Structural Health Monitoring framework. The continuous monitoring of these physical quantities can provide fundamental information on the actual health status of the structure and can accurately guide pro-active condition-based maintenance operations, thus reducing the maintenance costs and extending the service life of the monitored structures. Pushed by these needs and by the simultaneous development in the field of strain sensing technologies, several displacement reconstruction and load identification methods have been developed that are based on discrete strain measurements. Among the different formulations, the inverse Finite Element Method (iFEM), the Modal Method (MM) and the 2-step method, the latter being the only one able to also compute the loads together with the displacements, have emerged as the most accurate and reliable ones. In this paper, the formulation of the three methods is summarized in order to set the numerical framework for a comparative study. The three methods are tested on the reconstruction of the external load and of the displacement field of a stiffened aluminium plate starting from experimentally measured strains. A fibre optic sensing system has been used to measure surface strains and an optimization procedure has been performed to provide the best fibre pattern, based on five lines running along the stiffeners’ direction and with a back-to-back measuring scheme. Additional sensors are used to measure the applied force and the plate’s deflection in some locations. The comparison of the results obtained by each method proves the extreme accuracy and reliability of the iFEM in the reconstruction of the deformed shape of the panel. On the other hand, the Modal Method leads to a good reconstruction of the displacements, but also exhibits a sensitivity to the choice of the modes considered for the specific application. Finally, the 2-step approach is able to correctly identify the loads and to reconstruct the displacements with an accuracy that depends on the modeling of the experimental setup. MDPI 2022-01-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8837932/ /pubmed/35161812 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22031064 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Esposito, Marco Mattone, Massimiliano Gherlone, Marco Experimental Shape Sensing and Load Identification on a Stiffened Panel: A Comparative Study |
title | Experimental Shape Sensing and Load Identification on a Stiffened Panel: A Comparative Study |
title_full | Experimental Shape Sensing and Load Identification on a Stiffened Panel: A Comparative Study |
title_fullStr | Experimental Shape Sensing and Load Identification on a Stiffened Panel: A Comparative Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Experimental Shape Sensing and Load Identification on a Stiffened Panel: A Comparative Study |
title_short | Experimental Shape Sensing and Load Identification on a Stiffened Panel: A Comparative Study |
title_sort | experimental shape sensing and load identification on a stiffened panel: a comparative study |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8837932/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35161812 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22031064 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT espositomarco experimentalshapesensingandloadidentificationonastiffenedpanelacomparativestudy AT mattonemassimiliano experimentalshapesensingandloadidentificationonastiffenedpanelacomparativestudy AT gherlonemarco experimentalshapesensingandloadidentificationonastiffenedpanelacomparativestudy |