Cargando…
Reliability and Validity of an Inertial Measurement System to Quantify Lower Extremity Joint Angle in Functional Movements
The purpose of this research was to determine if the commercially available Perception Neuron motion capture system was valid and reliable in clinically relevant lower limb functional tasks. Twenty healthy participants performed two sessions on different days: gait, squat, single-leg squat, side lun...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8838175/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35161609 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22030863 |
_version_ | 1784650061142032384 |
---|---|
author | Shuai, Zhenyu Dong, Anqi Liu, Haoyang Cui, Yixiong |
author_facet | Shuai, Zhenyu Dong, Anqi Liu, Haoyang Cui, Yixiong |
author_sort | Shuai, Zhenyu |
collection | PubMed |
description | The purpose of this research was to determine if the commercially available Perception Neuron motion capture system was valid and reliable in clinically relevant lower limb functional tasks. Twenty healthy participants performed two sessions on different days: gait, squat, single-leg squat, side lunge, forward lunge, and counter-movement jump. Seven IMUs and an OptiTrack system were used to record the three-dimensional joint kinematics of the lower extremity. To evaluate the performance, the multiple correlation coefficient (CMC) and the root mean square error (RMSE) of the waveforms as well as the difference and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of discrete parameters were calculated. In all tasks, the CMC revealed fair to excellent waveform similarity (0.47–0.99) and the RMSE was between 3.57° and 13.14°. The difference between discrete parameters was lower than 14.54°. The repeatability analysis of waveforms showed that the CMC was between 0.54 and 0.95 and the RMSE was less than 5° in the frontal and transverse planes. The ICC of all joint angles in the IMU was general to excellent (0.57–1). Our findings showed that the IMU system might be utilized to evaluate lower extremity 3D joint kinematics in functional motions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8838175 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88381752022-02-13 Reliability and Validity of an Inertial Measurement System to Quantify Lower Extremity Joint Angle in Functional Movements Shuai, Zhenyu Dong, Anqi Liu, Haoyang Cui, Yixiong Sensors (Basel) Article The purpose of this research was to determine if the commercially available Perception Neuron motion capture system was valid and reliable in clinically relevant lower limb functional tasks. Twenty healthy participants performed two sessions on different days: gait, squat, single-leg squat, side lunge, forward lunge, and counter-movement jump. Seven IMUs and an OptiTrack system were used to record the three-dimensional joint kinematics of the lower extremity. To evaluate the performance, the multiple correlation coefficient (CMC) and the root mean square error (RMSE) of the waveforms as well as the difference and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of discrete parameters were calculated. In all tasks, the CMC revealed fair to excellent waveform similarity (0.47–0.99) and the RMSE was between 3.57° and 13.14°. The difference between discrete parameters was lower than 14.54°. The repeatability analysis of waveforms showed that the CMC was between 0.54 and 0.95 and the RMSE was less than 5° in the frontal and transverse planes. The ICC of all joint angles in the IMU was general to excellent (0.57–1). Our findings showed that the IMU system might be utilized to evaluate lower extremity 3D joint kinematics in functional motions. MDPI 2022-01-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8838175/ /pubmed/35161609 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22030863 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Shuai, Zhenyu Dong, Anqi Liu, Haoyang Cui, Yixiong Reliability and Validity of an Inertial Measurement System to Quantify Lower Extremity Joint Angle in Functional Movements |
title | Reliability and Validity of an Inertial Measurement System to Quantify Lower Extremity Joint Angle in Functional Movements |
title_full | Reliability and Validity of an Inertial Measurement System to Quantify Lower Extremity Joint Angle in Functional Movements |
title_fullStr | Reliability and Validity of an Inertial Measurement System to Quantify Lower Extremity Joint Angle in Functional Movements |
title_full_unstemmed | Reliability and Validity of an Inertial Measurement System to Quantify Lower Extremity Joint Angle in Functional Movements |
title_short | Reliability and Validity of an Inertial Measurement System to Quantify Lower Extremity Joint Angle in Functional Movements |
title_sort | reliability and validity of an inertial measurement system to quantify lower extremity joint angle in functional movements |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8838175/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35161609 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22030863 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shuaizhenyu reliabilityandvalidityofaninertialmeasurementsystemtoquantifylowerextremityjointangleinfunctionalmovements AT donganqi reliabilityandvalidityofaninertialmeasurementsystemtoquantifylowerextremityjointangleinfunctionalmovements AT liuhaoyang reliabilityandvalidityofaninertialmeasurementsystemtoquantifylowerextremityjointangleinfunctionalmovements AT cuiyixiong reliabilityandvalidityofaninertialmeasurementsystemtoquantifylowerextremityjointangleinfunctionalmovements |