Cargando…

Biodegradable Hydrogel Beads Combined with Calcium Phosphate Bone Cement for Bone Repair: In Vitro and In Vivo Characterization

This study evaluated the in vitro characterizations of biodegradable hydrogel beads with calcium phosphate bone cement (CPC). Commercial fast-setting CPC and hydrogel beads were compared with 25%-volume hydrogel in CPC (C/0.25) in vivo. The histological behaviors and absorption rates of CPC only, hy...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fu, Po-Sung, Wang, Jen-Chyan, Lai, Pei-Ling, Liu, Shih-Ming, Chen, Ya-Shun, Chen, Wen-Cheng, Hung, Chun-Cheng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8838511/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35160495
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym14030505
_version_ 1784650145607974912
author Fu, Po-Sung
Wang, Jen-Chyan
Lai, Pei-Ling
Liu, Shih-Ming
Chen, Ya-Shun
Chen, Wen-Cheng
Hung, Chun-Cheng
author_facet Fu, Po-Sung
Wang, Jen-Chyan
Lai, Pei-Ling
Liu, Shih-Ming
Chen, Ya-Shun
Chen, Wen-Cheng
Hung, Chun-Cheng
author_sort Fu, Po-Sung
collection PubMed
description This study evaluated the in vitro characterizations of biodegradable hydrogel beads with calcium phosphate bone cement (CPC). Commercial fast-setting CPC and hydrogel beads were compared with 25%-volume hydrogel in CPC (C/0.25) in vivo. The histological behaviors and absorption rates of CPC only, hydrogel beads, and hydrogel/CPC composite were measured and compared at 4, 8, and 12 weeks. The results indicated that the C/0.25 composite can be molded and does not disintegrate when immersed in the solution, but this delays the phase transition of the CPC into the product in the early reaction process. The osteoprogenitor D1 cell affinity of the C/0.25 composite was equally competitive with that of the CPC-only. Adding hydrogel beads to CPC did not inhibit cell proliferation as well as differentiation of osteoprogenitor cells. In vivo histological evaluations did not indicate any significant difference in the CPC-only, hydrogel-only, and C/0.25 composite after 4 weeks of implantation; however, significantly less residue was observed in the C/0.25 composite relative to the CPC-only after 8 weeks. After 12 weeks of hydrogel beads implantation, the hydrogel degraded substantially, creating vacancies that were subsequently occupied by a large amount of soft tissue. New bone was formed in large quantities in the C/0.25; therefore, the C/0.25 composite is a promising option for a wide range of dental, craniofacial, and orthopedic applications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8838511
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88385112022-02-13 Biodegradable Hydrogel Beads Combined with Calcium Phosphate Bone Cement for Bone Repair: In Vitro and In Vivo Characterization Fu, Po-Sung Wang, Jen-Chyan Lai, Pei-Ling Liu, Shih-Ming Chen, Ya-Shun Chen, Wen-Cheng Hung, Chun-Cheng Polymers (Basel) Article This study evaluated the in vitro characterizations of biodegradable hydrogel beads with calcium phosphate bone cement (CPC). Commercial fast-setting CPC and hydrogel beads were compared with 25%-volume hydrogel in CPC (C/0.25) in vivo. The histological behaviors and absorption rates of CPC only, hydrogel beads, and hydrogel/CPC composite were measured and compared at 4, 8, and 12 weeks. The results indicated that the C/0.25 composite can be molded and does not disintegrate when immersed in the solution, but this delays the phase transition of the CPC into the product in the early reaction process. The osteoprogenitor D1 cell affinity of the C/0.25 composite was equally competitive with that of the CPC-only. Adding hydrogel beads to CPC did not inhibit cell proliferation as well as differentiation of osteoprogenitor cells. In vivo histological evaluations did not indicate any significant difference in the CPC-only, hydrogel-only, and C/0.25 composite after 4 weeks of implantation; however, significantly less residue was observed in the C/0.25 composite relative to the CPC-only after 8 weeks. After 12 weeks of hydrogel beads implantation, the hydrogel degraded substantially, creating vacancies that were subsequently occupied by a large amount of soft tissue. New bone was formed in large quantities in the C/0.25; therefore, the C/0.25 composite is a promising option for a wide range of dental, craniofacial, and orthopedic applications. MDPI 2022-01-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8838511/ /pubmed/35160495 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym14030505 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Fu, Po-Sung
Wang, Jen-Chyan
Lai, Pei-Ling
Liu, Shih-Ming
Chen, Ya-Shun
Chen, Wen-Cheng
Hung, Chun-Cheng
Biodegradable Hydrogel Beads Combined with Calcium Phosphate Bone Cement for Bone Repair: In Vitro and In Vivo Characterization
title Biodegradable Hydrogel Beads Combined with Calcium Phosphate Bone Cement for Bone Repair: In Vitro and In Vivo Characterization
title_full Biodegradable Hydrogel Beads Combined with Calcium Phosphate Bone Cement for Bone Repair: In Vitro and In Vivo Characterization
title_fullStr Biodegradable Hydrogel Beads Combined with Calcium Phosphate Bone Cement for Bone Repair: In Vitro and In Vivo Characterization
title_full_unstemmed Biodegradable Hydrogel Beads Combined with Calcium Phosphate Bone Cement for Bone Repair: In Vitro and In Vivo Characterization
title_short Biodegradable Hydrogel Beads Combined with Calcium Phosphate Bone Cement for Bone Repair: In Vitro and In Vivo Characterization
title_sort biodegradable hydrogel beads combined with calcium phosphate bone cement for bone repair: in vitro and in vivo characterization
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8838511/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35160495
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym14030505
work_keys_str_mv AT fuposung biodegradablehydrogelbeadscombinedwithcalciumphosphatebonecementforbonerepairinvitroandinvivocharacterization
AT wangjenchyan biodegradablehydrogelbeadscombinedwithcalciumphosphatebonecementforbonerepairinvitroandinvivocharacterization
AT laipeiling biodegradablehydrogelbeadscombinedwithcalciumphosphatebonecementforbonerepairinvitroandinvivocharacterization
AT liushihming biodegradablehydrogelbeadscombinedwithcalciumphosphatebonecementforbonerepairinvitroandinvivocharacterization
AT chenyashun biodegradablehydrogelbeadscombinedwithcalciumphosphatebonecementforbonerepairinvitroandinvivocharacterization
AT chenwencheng biodegradablehydrogelbeadscombinedwithcalciumphosphatebonecementforbonerepairinvitroandinvivocharacterization
AT hungchuncheng biodegradablehydrogelbeadscombinedwithcalciumphosphatebonecementforbonerepairinvitroandinvivocharacterization