Cargando…

Comparison of Prestressing Methods with CFRP and SMA Materials in Flexurally Strengthened RC Members

Over the years, prestressing concrete has become a well-known technique to improve the ultimate and serviceability state of RC members. Besides steel reinforcement, relatively new materials such as carbon fiber reinforced polymers (CFRP) or especially shape memory alloys (SMA) can be used to active...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rogowski, Janusz, Kotynia, Renata
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8838536/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35161175
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15031231
_version_ 1784650151637286912
author Rogowski, Janusz
Kotynia, Renata
author_facet Rogowski, Janusz
Kotynia, Renata
author_sort Rogowski, Janusz
collection PubMed
description Over the years, prestressing concrete has become a well-known technique to improve the ultimate and serviceability state of RC members. Besides steel reinforcement, relatively new materials such as carbon fiber reinforced polymers (CFRP) or especially shape memory alloys (SMA) can be used to active strengthening. The main scope of this paper is to compare various prestressing methods using carbon composites and memory steel alloys. A description of SMA, shape memory effect, its utilization for prestressing, and CFRP materials are presented in the paper. Moreover, current state-of-the-art developments in the field of both materials, considering prestressing systems and available anchorage, material behavior, creep and stress relaxation, durability issues, thermal compatibility with concrete, and fire behavior, are described. A general revision of previous studies based on flexural strengthening using both materials is conducted and the selected results of these studies are briefly presented. The behavior of RC beams after strengthening with mentioned techniques is compared and discussed. Selected on-site applications are described to confirm the feasibility and practicality of the strengthening systems. Finally, the main advantages and disadvantages of CFRP and SMA materials for prestressing concrete structures are summarized and further recommendations for the future research are listed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8838536
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88385362022-02-13 Comparison of Prestressing Methods with CFRP and SMA Materials in Flexurally Strengthened RC Members Rogowski, Janusz Kotynia, Renata Materials (Basel) Review Over the years, prestressing concrete has become a well-known technique to improve the ultimate and serviceability state of RC members. Besides steel reinforcement, relatively new materials such as carbon fiber reinforced polymers (CFRP) or especially shape memory alloys (SMA) can be used to active strengthening. The main scope of this paper is to compare various prestressing methods using carbon composites and memory steel alloys. A description of SMA, shape memory effect, its utilization for prestressing, and CFRP materials are presented in the paper. Moreover, current state-of-the-art developments in the field of both materials, considering prestressing systems and available anchorage, material behavior, creep and stress relaxation, durability issues, thermal compatibility with concrete, and fire behavior, are described. A general revision of previous studies based on flexural strengthening using both materials is conducted and the selected results of these studies are briefly presented. The behavior of RC beams after strengthening with mentioned techniques is compared and discussed. Selected on-site applications are described to confirm the feasibility and practicality of the strengthening systems. Finally, the main advantages and disadvantages of CFRP and SMA materials for prestressing concrete structures are summarized and further recommendations for the future research are listed. MDPI 2022-02-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8838536/ /pubmed/35161175 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15031231 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Rogowski, Janusz
Kotynia, Renata
Comparison of Prestressing Methods with CFRP and SMA Materials in Flexurally Strengthened RC Members
title Comparison of Prestressing Methods with CFRP and SMA Materials in Flexurally Strengthened RC Members
title_full Comparison of Prestressing Methods with CFRP and SMA Materials in Flexurally Strengthened RC Members
title_fullStr Comparison of Prestressing Methods with CFRP and SMA Materials in Flexurally Strengthened RC Members
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Prestressing Methods with CFRP and SMA Materials in Flexurally Strengthened RC Members
title_short Comparison of Prestressing Methods with CFRP and SMA Materials in Flexurally Strengthened RC Members
title_sort comparison of prestressing methods with cfrp and sma materials in flexurally strengthened rc members
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8838536/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35161175
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15031231
work_keys_str_mv AT rogowskijanusz comparisonofprestressingmethodswithcfrpandsmamaterialsinflexurallystrengthenedrcmembers
AT kotyniarenata comparisonofprestressingmethodswithcfrpandsmamaterialsinflexurallystrengthenedrcmembers