Cargando…

Analysis of the Relative Humidity Response of Hydrophilic Polymers for Optical Fiber Sensing

Relative humidity (RH) monitorization is of extreme importance on scientific and industrial applications, and optical fiber sensors (OFS) may provide adequate solutions. Typically, these kinds of sensors depend on the usage of humidity responsive polymers, thus creating the need for the characteriza...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dias, Bernardo, Carvalho, João, Mendes, João P., Almeida, José M. M. M., Coelho, Luís C. C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8838667/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35160429
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym14030439
_version_ 1784650182704496640
author Dias, Bernardo
Carvalho, João
Mendes, João P.
Almeida, José M. M. M.
Coelho, Luís C. C.
author_facet Dias, Bernardo
Carvalho, João
Mendes, João P.
Almeida, José M. M. M.
Coelho, Luís C. C.
author_sort Dias, Bernardo
collection PubMed
description Relative humidity (RH) monitorization is of extreme importance on scientific and industrial applications, and optical fiber sensors (OFS) may provide adequate solutions. Typically, these kinds of sensors depend on the usage of humidity responsive polymers, thus creating the need for the characterization of the optical and expansion properties of these materials. Four different polymers, namely poly(vinyl alcohol), poly(ethylene glycol), Hydromed™ D4 and microbiology agar were characterized and tested using two types of optical sensors. First, optical fiber Fabry–Perot (FP) tips were made, which allow the dynamical measurement of the polymers’ response to RH variations, in particular of refractive index, film thickness, and critical deliquescence RH. Using both FP tips and Long-Period fiber gratings, the polymers were then tested as RH sensors, allowing a comparison between the different polymers and the different OFS. For the case of the FP sensors, the PEG tips displayed excellent sensitivity above 80%RH, outperforming the other polymers. In the case of LPFGs, the 10% (wt/wt) PVA one displayed excellent sensitivity in a larger working range (60 to 100%RH), showing a valid alternative to lower RH environment sensing.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8838667
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88386672022-02-13 Analysis of the Relative Humidity Response of Hydrophilic Polymers for Optical Fiber Sensing Dias, Bernardo Carvalho, João Mendes, João P. Almeida, José M. M. M. Coelho, Luís C. C. Polymers (Basel) Article Relative humidity (RH) monitorization is of extreme importance on scientific and industrial applications, and optical fiber sensors (OFS) may provide adequate solutions. Typically, these kinds of sensors depend on the usage of humidity responsive polymers, thus creating the need for the characterization of the optical and expansion properties of these materials. Four different polymers, namely poly(vinyl alcohol), poly(ethylene glycol), Hydromed™ D4 and microbiology agar were characterized and tested using two types of optical sensors. First, optical fiber Fabry–Perot (FP) tips were made, which allow the dynamical measurement of the polymers’ response to RH variations, in particular of refractive index, film thickness, and critical deliquescence RH. Using both FP tips and Long-Period fiber gratings, the polymers were then tested as RH sensors, allowing a comparison between the different polymers and the different OFS. For the case of the FP sensors, the PEG tips displayed excellent sensitivity above 80%RH, outperforming the other polymers. In the case of LPFGs, the 10% (wt/wt) PVA one displayed excellent sensitivity in a larger working range (60 to 100%RH), showing a valid alternative to lower RH environment sensing. MDPI 2022-01-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8838667/ /pubmed/35160429 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym14030439 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Dias, Bernardo
Carvalho, João
Mendes, João P.
Almeida, José M. M. M.
Coelho, Luís C. C.
Analysis of the Relative Humidity Response of Hydrophilic Polymers for Optical Fiber Sensing
title Analysis of the Relative Humidity Response of Hydrophilic Polymers for Optical Fiber Sensing
title_full Analysis of the Relative Humidity Response of Hydrophilic Polymers for Optical Fiber Sensing
title_fullStr Analysis of the Relative Humidity Response of Hydrophilic Polymers for Optical Fiber Sensing
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of the Relative Humidity Response of Hydrophilic Polymers for Optical Fiber Sensing
title_short Analysis of the Relative Humidity Response of Hydrophilic Polymers for Optical Fiber Sensing
title_sort analysis of the relative humidity response of hydrophilic polymers for optical fiber sensing
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8838667/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35160429
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym14030439
work_keys_str_mv AT diasbernardo analysisoftherelativehumidityresponseofhydrophilicpolymersforopticalfibersensing
AT carvalhojoao analysisoftherelativehumidityresponseofhydrophilicpolymersforopticalfibersensing
AT mendesjoaop analysisoftherelativehumidityresponseofhydrophilicpolymersforopticalfibersensing
AT almeidajosemmm analysisoftherelativehumidityresponseofhydrophilicpolymersforopticalfibersensing
AT coelholuiscc analysisoftherelativehumidityresponseofhydrophilicpolymersforopticalfibersensing