Cargando…

Identification of Weed-Suppressive Tomato Cultivars for Weed Management

Weed-suppressive crop cultivars are a potentially attractive option in weed management strategies (IWM). A greenhouse study was conducted at the R. R. Foil Plant Science Research Center, Starkville, MS, to assess the potential weed-suppressive ability of 17 tomato cultivars against Palmer amaranth (...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Werle, Isabel Schlegel, Castro, Edicarlos, Pucci, Carolina, Soni Chakraborty, Bhawna, Broderick, Shaun, Tseng, Te Ming
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8838724/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35161392
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants11030411
_version_ 1784650196255244288
author Werle, Isabel Schlegel
Castro, Edicarlos
Pucci, Carolina
Soni Chakraborty, Bhawna
Broderick, Shaun
Tseng, Te Ming
author_facet Werle, Isabel Schlegel
Castro, Edicarlos
Pucci, Carolina
Soni Chakraborty, Bhawna
Broderick, Shaun
Tseng, Te Ming
author_sort Werle, Isabel Schlegel
collection PubMed
description Weed-suppressive crop cultivars are a potentially attractive option in weed management strategies (IWM). A greenhouse study was conducted at the R. R. Foil Plant Science Research Center, Starkville, MS, to assess the potential weed-suppressive ability of 17 tomato cultivars against Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri S. Wats), yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus L.), and large crabgrass (Digitaria sanguinalis L.). The experiment was a completely randomized design, with four replications, and was repeated twice. The height, chlorophyll, and dry weight biomass of the weeds were measured 28 days after sowing. Weed suppression varied greatly among tomato cultivars. The most significant effect of tomato interference was recorded on Palmer amaranth, and the least reduction was observed with yellow nutsedge plants. Cultivars 15 and 41 reduced Palmer amaranth height and biomass by about 45 and 80%, respectively, while cultivar 38 reduced 60% of the chlorophyll percentage. Large crabgrass plants were 35% shorter in the presence of cultivar 38 and had a biomass reduction of 35% in the presence of cultivar 38. Under tomato interference, a minimal effect was observed in chlorophyll, height, and biomass of yellow nutsedge seedlings. Factoring all parameters evaluated, cultivars 38 and 33 were most suppressive against Palmer amaranth and large crabgrass.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8838724
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88387242022-02-13 Identification of Weed-Suppressive Tomato Cultivars for Weed Management Werle, Isabel Schlegel Castro, Edicarlos Pucci, Carolina Soni Chakraborty, Bhawna Broderick, Shaun Tseng, Te Ming Plants (Basel) Article Weed-suppressive crop cultivars are a potentially attractive option in weed management strategies (IWM). A greenhouse study was conducted at the R. R. Foil Plant Science Research Center, Starkville, MS, to assess the potential weed-suppressive ability of 17 tomato cultivars against Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri S. Wats), yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus L.), and large crabgrass (Digitaria sanguinalis L.). The experiment was a completely randomized design, with four replications, and was repeated twice. The height, chlorophyll, and dry weight biomass of the weeds were measured 28 days after sowing. Weed suppression varied greatly among tomato cultivars. The most significant effect of tomato interference was recorded on Palmer amaranth, and the least reduction was observed with yellow nutsedge plants. Cultivars 15 and 41 reduced Palmer amaranth height and biomass by about 45 and 80%, respectively, while cultivar 38 reduced 60% of the chlorophyll percentage. Large crabgrass plants were 35% shorter in the presence of cultivar 38 and had a biomass reduction of 35% in the presence of cultivar 38. Under tomato interference, a minimal effect was observed in chlorophyll, height, and biomass of yellow nutsedge seedlings. Factoring all parameters evaluated, cultivars 38 and 33 were most suppressive against Palmer amaranth and large crabgrass. MDPI 2022-02-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8838724/ /pubmed/35161392 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants11030411 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Werle, Isabel Schlegel
Castro, Edicarlos
Pucci, Carolina
Soni Chakraborty, Bhawna
Broderick, Shaun
Tseng, Te Ming
Identification of Weed-Suppressive Tomato Cultivars for Weed Management
title Identification of Weed-Suppressive Tomato Cultivars for Weed Management
title_full Identification of Weed-Suppressive Tomato Cultivars for Weed Management
title_fullStr Identification of Weed-Suppressive Tomato Cultivars for Weed Management
title_full_unstemmed Identification of Weed-Suppressive Tomato Cultivars for Weed Management
title_short Identification of Weed-Suppressive Tomato Cultivars for Weed Management
title_sort identification of weed-suppressive tomato cultivars for weed management
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8838724/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35161392
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants11030411
work_keys_str_mv AT werleisabelschlegel identificationofweedsuppressivetomatocultivarsforweedmanagement
AT castroedicarlos identificationofweedsuppressivetomatocultivarsforweedmanagement
AT puccicarolina identificationofweedsuppressivetomatocultivarsforweedmanagement
AT sonichakrabortybhawna identificationofweedsuppressivetomatocultivarsforweedmanagement
AT broderickshaun identificationofweedsuppressivetomatocultivarsforweedmanagement
AT tsengteming identificationofweedsuppressivetomatocultivarsforweedmanagement