Cargando…

Deficiencies in the Risk Assessment of Genetically Engineered Bt Cowpea Approved for Cultivation in Nigeria: A Critical Review

We analyze the application filed for the marketing and cultivation of genetically engineered Bt cowpea (event AAT 709A) approved in Nigeria in 2019. Cowpea (Vigna ungiguiculata) is extensively grown throughout sub-Saharan Africa and consumed by around two hundred million people. The transgenic plant...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Then, Christoph, Miyazaki, Juliana, Bauer-Panskus, Andreas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8838765/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35161361
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants11030380
_version_ 1784650206048944128
author Then, Christoph
Miyazaki, Juliana
Bauer-Panskus, Andreas
author_facet Then, Christoph
Miyazaki, Juliana
Bauer-Panskus, Andreas
author_sort Then, Christoph
collection PubMed
description We analyze the application filed for the marketing and cultivation of genetically engineered Bt cowpea (event AAT 709A) approved in Nigeria in 2019. Cowpea (Vigna ungiguiculata) is extensively grown throughout sub-Saharan Africa and consumed by around two hundred million people. The transgenic plants produce an insecticidal, recombinant Bt toxin meant to protect the plants against the larvae of Maruca vitrata, which feed on the plants and are also known as pod borer. Our analysis of the application reveals issues of concern regarding the safety of the Bt toxins produced in the plants. These concerns include stability of gene expression, impact on soil organisms, effects on non-target species and food safety. In addition, we show deficiencies in the risk assessment of potential gene flow and uncontrolled spread of the transgenes and cultivated varieties as well as the maintenance of seed collections. As far as information is publicly available, we analyze the application by referring to established standards of GMO risk assessment. We take the provisions of the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety (CPB) into account, of which both Nigeria and the EU are parties. We also refer to the EU standards for GMO risk assessment, which are complementary to the provisions of the CPB.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8838765
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88387652022-02-13 Deficiencies in the Risk Assessment of Genetically Engineered Bt Cowpea Approved for Cultivation in Nigeria: A Critical Review Then, Christoph Miyazaki, Juliana Bauer-Panskus, Andreas Plants (Basel) Review We analyze the application filed for the marketing and cultivation of genetically engineered Bt cowpea (event AAT 709A) approved in Nigeria in 2019. Cowpea (Vigna ungiguiculata) is extensively grown throughout sub-Saharan Africa and consumed by around two hundred million people. The transgenic plants produce an insecticidal, recombinant Bt toxin meant to protect the plants against the larvae of Maruca vitrata, which feed on the plants and are also known as pod borer. Our analysis of the application reveals issues of concern regarding the safety of the Bt toxins produced in the plants. These concerns include stability of gene expression, impact on soil organisms, effects on non-target species and food safety. In addition, we show deficiencies in the risk assessment of potential gene flow and uncontrolled spread of the transgenes and cultivated varieties as well as the maintenance of seed collections. As far as information is publicly available, we analyze the application by referring to established standards of GMO risk assessment. We take the provisions of the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety (CPB) into account, of which both Nigeria and the EU are parties. We also refer to the EU standards for GMO risk assessment, which are complementary to the provisions of the CPB. MDPI 2022-01-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8838765/ /pubmed/35161361 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants11030380 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Then, Christoph
Miyazaki, Juliana
Bauer-Panskus, Andreas
Deficiencies in the Risk Assessment of Genetically Engineered Bt Cowpea Approved for Cultivation in Nigeria: A Critical Review
title Deficiencies in the Risk Assessment of Genetically Engineered Bt Cowpea Approved for Cultivation in Nigeria: A Critical Review
title_full Deficiencies in the Risk Assessment of Genetically Engineered Bt Cowpea Approved for Cultivation in Nigeria: A Critical Review
title_fullStr Deficiencies in the Risk Assessment of Genetically Engineered Bt Cowpea Approved for Cultivation in Nigeria: A Critical Review
title_full_unstemmed Deficiencies in the Risk Assessment of Genetically Engineered Bt Cowpea Approved for Cultivation in Nigeria: A Critical Review
title_short Deficiencies in the Risk Assessment of Genetically Engineered Bt Cowpea Approved for Cultivation in Nigeria: A Critical Review
title_sort deficiencies in the risk assessment of genetically engineered bt cowpea approved for cultivation in nigeria: a critical review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8838765/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35161361
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants11030380
work_keys_str_mv AT thenchristoph deficienciesintheriskassessmentofgeneticallyengineeredbtcowpeaapprovedforcultivationinnigeriaacriticalreview
AT miyazakijuliana deficienciesintheriskassessmentofgeneticallyengineeredbtcowpeaapprovedforcultivationinnigeriaacriticalreview
AT bauerpanskusandreas deficienciesintheriskassessmentofgeneticallyengineeredbtcowpeaapprovedforcultivationinnigeriaacriticalreview