Cargando…
Bracket Bonding to All-Ceramic Materials with Universal Adhesives
The need for bracket bonding to ceramic restorations is increasing. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of universal adhesives on bracket adhesion to polished or glazed lithium disilicate (LDS) and monolithic zirconia (MZ) surfaces. One hundred and twenty brackets (N = 10) were bonded t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8839010/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35161189 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15031245 |
_version_ | 1784650264983109632 |
---|---|
author | Goracci, Cecilia Di Bello, Giuseppe Franchi, Lorenzo Louca, Chris Juloski, Jelena Juloski, Jovana Vichi, Alessandro |
author_facet | Goracci, Cecilia Di Bello, Giuseppe Franchi, Lorenzo Louca, Chris Juloski, Jelena Juloski, Jovana Vichi, Alessandro |
author_sort | Goracci, Cecilia |
collection | PubMed |
description | The need for bracket bonding to ceramic restorations is increasing. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of universal adhesives on bracket adhesion to polished or glazed lithium disilicate (LDS) and monolithic zirconia (MZ) surfaces. One hundred and twenty brackets (N = 10) were bonded to either polished or glazed LDS (e.max CAD B32, Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein) and MZ (In-Ceram(®) YZ, VITA, Bad Sackingen, Germany) blocks using three different adhesives combined with Transbond™ XT Paste (3M Unitek, Monrovia, CA, USA). Tested universal adhesives were Scotchbond™ Universal Adhesive (SU, 3M St. Paul, MN, USA) and Assure Plus (AP, Reliance, Itasca, IL, USA). Transbond™ XT Primer (XTP, 3M Unitek, Monrovia, CA, USA) served as a control adhesive. Bracket bond strength was measured in shear mode (SBS). Failure type was determined by the Modified Adhesive Remnant Index (ARI). Data were statistically analyzed. On polished LDS, SU yielded bracket SBS significantly superior to those of AP and XTP. On polished MZ, the use of SU and AP significantly enhanced bracket retention as compared with XTP. Low SBS values, below the threshold of clinical acceptability, were reached by all tested adhesives on glazed LDS and MZ specimens. SBS measurements corresponded with failure type observations. Universal adhesives SU and AP could be considered for use on polished LDS and MZ surfaces. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8839010 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88390102022-02-13 Bracket Bonding to All-Ceramic Materials with Universal Adhesives Goracci, Cecilia Di Bello, Giuseppe Franchi, Lorenzo Louca, Chris Juloski, Jelena Juloski, Jovana Vichi, Alessandro Materials (Basel) Article The need for bracket bonding to ceramic restorations is increasing. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of universal adhesives on bracket adhesion to polished or glazed lithium disilicate (LDS) and monolithic zirconia (MZ) surfaces. One hundred and twenty brackets (N = 10) were bonded to either polished or glazed LDS (e.max CAD B32, Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein) and MZ (In-Ceram(®) YZ, VITA, Bad Sackingen, Germany) blocks using three different adhesives combined with Transbond™ XT Paste (3M Unitek, Monrovia, CA, USA). Tested universal adhesives were Scotchbond™ Universal Adhesive (SU, 3M St. Paul, MN, USA) and Assure Plus (AP, Reliance, Itasca, IL, USA). Transbond™ XT Primer (XTP, 3M Unitek, Monrovia, CA, USA) served as a control adhesive. Bracket bond strength was measured in shear mode (SBS). Failure type was determined by the Modified Adhesive Remnant Index (ARI). Data were statistically analyzed. On polished LDS, SU yielded bracket SBS significantly superior to those of AP and XTP. On polished MZ, the use of SU and AP significantly enhanced bracket retention as compared with XTP. Low SBS values, below the threshold of clinical acceptability, were reached by all tested adhesives on glazed LDS and MZ specimens. SBS measurements corresponded with failure type observations. Universal adhesives SU and AP could be considered for use on polished LDS and MZ surfaces. MDPI 2022-02-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8839010/ /pubmed/35161189 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15031245 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Goracci, Cecilia Di Bello, Giuseppe Franchi, Lorenzo Louca, Chris Juloski, Jelena Juloski, Jovana Vichi, Alessandro Bracket Bonding to All-Ceramic Materials with Universal Adhesives |
title | Bracket Bonding to All-Ceramic Materials with Universal Adhesives |
title_full | Bracket Bonding to All-Ceramic Materials with Universal Adhesives |
title_fullStr | Bracket Bonding to All-Ceramic Materials with Universal Adhesives |
title_full_unstemmed | Bracket Bonding to All-Ceramic Materials with Universal Adhesives |
title_short | Bracket Bonding to All-Ceramic Materials with Universal Adhesives |
title_sort | bracket bonding to all-ceramic materials with universal adhesives |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8839010/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35161189 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15031245 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT goraccicecilia bracketbondingtoallceramicmaterialswithuniversaladhesives AT dibellogiuseppe bracketbondingtoallceramicmaterialswithuniversaladhesives AT franchilorenzo bracketbondingtoallceramicmaterialswithuniversaladhesives AT loucachris bracketbondingtoallceramicmaterialswithuniversaladhesives AT juloskijelena bracketbondingtoallceramicmaterialswithuniversaladhesives AT juloskijovana bracketbondingtoallceramicmaterialswithuniversaladhesives AT vichialessandro bracketbondingtoallceramicmaterialswithuniversaladhesives |