Cargando…

Beam Damage Assessment Using Natural Frequency Shift and Machine Learning

Damage detection based on modal parameter changes has become popular in the last few decades. Nowadays, there are robust and reliable mathematical relations available to predict natural frequency changes if damage parameters are known. Using these relations, it is possible to create databases contai...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gillich, Nicoleta, Tufisi, Cristian, Sacarea, Christian, Rusu, Catalin V., Gillich, Gilbert-Rainer, Praisach, Zeno-Iosif, Ardeljan, Mario
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8839218/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35161863
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22031118
_version_ 1784650316656934912
author Gillich, Nicoleta
Tufisi, Cristian
Sacarea, Christian
Rusu, Catalin V.
Gillich, Gilbert-Rainer
Praisach, Zeno-Iosif
Ardeljan, Mario
author_facet Gillich, Nicoleta
Tufisi, Cristian
Sacarea, Christian
Rusu, Catalin V.
Gillich, Gilbert-Rainer
Praisach, Zeno-Iosif
Ardeljan, Mario
author_sort Gillich, Nicoleta
collection PubMed
description Damage detection based on modal parameter changes has become popular in the last few decades. Nowadays, there are robust and reliable mathematical relations available to predict natural frequency changes if damage parameters are known. Using these relations, it is possible to create databases containing a large variety of damage scenarios. Damage can be thus assessed by applying an inverse method. The problem is the complexity of the database, especially for structures with more cracks. In this paper, we propose two machine learning methods, namely the random forest (RF), and the artificial neural network (ANN), as search tools. The databases we developed contain damage scenarios for a prismatic cantilever beam with one crack and ideal and non-ideal boundary conditions. The crack assessment was made in two steps. First, a coarse damage location was found from the networks trained for scenarios comprising the whole beam. Afterwards, the assessment was made involving a particular network trained for the segment of the beam on which the crack was previously found. Using the two machine learning methods, we succeeded in estimating the crack location and severity with high accuracy for both simulation and laboratory experiments. Regarding the location of the crack, which was the main goal of the practitioners, the errors were less than 0.6%. Based on these achievements, we concluded that the damage assessment we propose, in conjunction with the machine learning methods, is robust and reliable.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8839218
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88392182022-02-13 Beam Damage Assessment Using Natural Frequency Shift and Machine Learning Gillich, Nicoleta Tufisi, Cristian Sacarea, Christian Rusu, Catalin V. Gillich, Gilbert-Rainer Praisach, Zeno-Iosif Ardeljan, Mario Sensors (Basel) Article Damage detection based on modal parameter changes has become popular in the last few decades. Nowadays, there are robust and reliable mathematical relations available to predict natural frequency changes if damage parameters are known. Using these relations, it is possible to create databases containing a large variety of damage scenarios. Damage can be thus assessed by applying an inverse method. The problem is the complexity of the database, especially for structures with more cracks. In this paper, we propose two machine learning methods, namely the random forest (RF), and the artificial neural network (ANN), as search tools. The databases we developed contain damage scenarios for a prismatic cantilever beam with one crack and ideal and non-ideal boundary conditions. The crack assessment was made in two steps. First, a coarse damage location was found from the networks trained for scenarios comprising the whole beam. Afterwards, the assessment was made involving a particular network trained for the segment of the beam on which the crack was previously found. Using the two machine learning methods, we succeeded in estimating the crack location and severity with high accuracy for both simulation and laboratory experiments. Regarding the location of the crack, which was the main goal of the practitioners, the errors were less than 0.6%. Based on these achievements, we concluded that the damage assessment we propose, in conjunction with the machine learning methods, is robust and reliable. MDPI 2022-02-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8839218/ /pubmed/35161863 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22031118 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Gillich, Nicoleta
Tufisi, Cristian
Sacarea, Christian
Rusu, Catalin V.
Gillich, Gilbert-Rainer
Praisach, Zeno-Iosif
Ardeljan, Mario
Beam Damage Assessment Using Natural Frequency Shift and Machine Learning
title Beam Damage Assessment Using Natural Frequency Shift and Machine Learning
title_full Beam Damage Assessment Using Natural Frequency Shift and Machine Learning
title_fullStr Beam Damage Assessment Using Natural Frequency Shift and Machine Learning
title_full_unstemmed Beam Damage Assessment Using Natural Frequency Shift and Machine Learning
title_short Beam Damage Assessment Using Natural Frequency Shift and Machine Learning
title_sort beam damage assessment using natural frequency shift and machine learning
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8839218/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35161863
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22031118
work_keys_str_mv AT gillichnicoleta beamdamageassessmentusingnaturalfrequencyshiftandmachinelearning
AT tufisicristian beamdamageassessmentusingnaturalfrequencyshiftandmachinelearning
AT sacareachristian beamdamageassessmentusingnaturalfrequencyshiftandmachinelearning
AT rusucatalinv beamdamageassessmentusingnaturalfrequencyshiftandmachinelearning
AT gillichgilbertrainer beamdamageassessmentusingnaturalfrequencyshiftandmachinelearning
AT praisachzenoiosif beamdamageassessmentusingnaturalfrequencyshiftandmachinelearning
AT ardeljanmario beamdamageassessmentusingnaturalfrequencyshiftandmachinelearning