Cargando…
Mono- and Multi-Objective CFD Optimization of Graded Foam-Filled Channels
Graded foam-filled channels are a very promising solution for improving the thermal performance of heat sinks because of their customized structures that leave large amounts of room for heat transfer enhancement. Accordingly, this paper proposes a comprehensive optimization framework to address the...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8839521/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35160914 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15030968 |
Sumario: | Graded foam-filled channels are a very promising solution for improving the thermal performance of heat sinks because of their customized structures that leave large amounts of room for heat transfer enhancement. Accordingly, this paper proposes a comprehensive optimization framework to address the design of such components, which are subjected to a uniform heat flux boundary condition. The graded foam is achieved by parameterizing the spatial distributions of porosity and/or Pores Per Inch (PPI). Mono- and multi-objective optimizations are implemented to find the best combination of the foam’s fluid-dynamic, geometrical and morphological design variables. The mono-objective approach addresses the Performance Evaluation Criterion (PEC) as an objective function to maximize the thermal efficiency of graded foams. The multi-objective approach addresses different objective functions by means of Pareto optimization to identify the optimal tradeoff solutions between heat transfer enhancement and pressure drop reduction. Optimizations are performed by assuming a local thermal non-equilibrium in the foam. They allowed us to achieve a 1.51 PEC value with H* = 0.50, Re(H) = 15000, i(ε) = i(PPI) = 0.50, ε(0) = 0.85, ε(1) = 0.97, PPI(0) = 5, PPI(1) = 40, and k(s)(→f) = 10(4) as the design variables. For the three multi-objective functions investigated, one can extrapolate the optimum from the Pareto front via the utopia criterion, obtaining [Formula: see text] = 502 W/m(2) K and Δp = 80 Pa, [Formula: see text] = 2790 and f = 42, [Formula: see text] = 0.011, and Δp* = 91. The optimal solutions provide original insights and guidelines for the thermal design of graded foam-filled channels. |
---|