Cargando…
Automatic Target Detection from Satellite Imagery Using Machine Learning
Object detection is a vital step in satellite imagery-based computer vision applications such as precision agriculture, urban planning and defense applications. In satellite imagery, object detection is a very complicated task due to various reasons including low pixel resolution of objects and dete...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8839603/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35161892 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22031147 |
_version_ | 1784650409105686528 |
---|---|
author | Tahir, Arsalan Munawar, Hafiz Suliman Akram, Junaid Adil, Muhammad Ali, Shehryar Kouzani, Abbas Z. Mahmud, M. A. Pervez |
author_facet | Tahir, Arsalan Munawar, Hafiz Suliman Akram, Junaid Adil, Muhammad Ali, Shehryar Kouzani, Abbas Z. Mahmud, M. A. Pervez |
author_sort | Tahir, Arsalan |
collection | PubMed |
description | Object detection is a vital step in satellite imagery-based computer vision applications such as precision agriculture, urban planning and defense applications. In satellite imagery, object detection is a very complicated task due to various reasons including low pixel resolution of objects and detection of small objects in the large scale (a single satellite image taken by Digital Globe comprises over 240 million pixels) satellite images. Object detection in satellite images has many challenges such as class variations, multiple objects pose, high variance in object size, illumination and a dense background. This study aims to compare the performance of existing deep learning algorithms for object detection in satellite imagery. We created the dataset of satellite imagery to perform object detection using convolutional neural network-based frameworks such as faster RCNN (faster region-based convolutional neural network), YOLO (you only look once), SSD (single-shot detector) and SIMRDWN (satellite imagery multiscale rapid detection with windowed networks). In addition to that, we also performed an analysis of these approaches in terms of accuracy and speed using the developed dataset of satellite imagery. The results showed that SIMRDWN has an accuracy of 97% on high-resolution images, while Faster RCNN has an accuracy of 95.31% on the standard resolution (1000 × 600). YOLOv3 has an accuracy of 94.20% on standard resolution (416 × 416) while on the other hand SSD has an accuracy of 84.61% on standard resolution (300 × 300). When it comes to speed and efficiency, YOLO is the obvious leader. In real-time surveillance, SIMRDWN fails. When YOLO takes 170 to 190 milliseconds to perform a task, SIMRDWN takes 5 to 103 milliseconds. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8839603 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88396032022-02-13 Automatic Target Detection from Satellite Imagery Using Machine Learning Tahir, Arsalan Munawar, Hafiz Suliman Akram, Junaid Adil, Muhammad Ali, Shehryar Kouzani, Abbas Z. Mahmud, M. A. Pervez Sensors (Basel) Article Object detection is a vital step in satellite imagery-based computer vision applications such as precision agriculture, urban planning and defense applications. In satellite imagery, object detection is a very complicated task due to various reasons including low pixel resolution of objects and detection of small objects in the large scale (a single satellite image taken by Digital Globe comprises over 240 million pixels) satellite images. Object detection in satellite images has many challenges such as class variations, multiple objects pose, high variance in object size, illumination and a dense background. This study aims to compare the performance of existing deep learning algorithms for object detection in satellite imagery. We created the dataset of satellite imagery to perform object detection using convolutional neural network-based frameworks such as faster RCNN (faster region-based convolutional neural network), YOLO (you only look once), SSD (single-shot detector) and SIMRDWN (satellite imagery multiscale rapid detection with windowed networks). In addition to that, we also performed an analysis of these approaches in terms of accuracy and speed using the developed dataset of satellite imagery. The results showed that SIMRDWN has an accuracy of 97% on high-resolution images, while Faster RCNN has an accuracy of 95.31% on the standard resolution (1000 × 600). YOLOv3 has an accuracy of 94.20% on standard resolution (416 × 416) while on the other hand SSD has an accuracy of 84.61% on standard resolution (300 × 300). When it comes to speed and efficiency, YOLO is the obvious leader. In real-time surveillance, SIMRDWN fails. When YOLO takes 170 to 190 milliseconds to perform a task, SIMRDWN takes 5 to 103 milliseconds. MDPI 2022-02-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8839603/ /pubmed/35161892 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22031147 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Tahir, Arsalan Munawar, Hafiz Suliman Akram, Junaid Adil, Muhammad Ali, Shehryar Kouzani, Abbas Z. Mahmud, M. A. Pervez Automatic Target Detection from Satellite Imagery Using Machine Learning |
title | Automatic Target Detection from Satellite Imagery Using Machine Learning |
title_full | Automatic Target Detection from Satellite Imagery Using Machine Learning |
title_fullStr | Automatic Target Detection from Satellite Imagery Using Machine Learning |
title_full_unstemmed | Automatic Target Detection from Satellite Imagery Using Machine Learning |
title_short | Automatic Target Detection from Satellite Imagery Using Machine Learning |
title_sort | automatic target detection from satellite imagery using machine learning |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8839603/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35161892 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22031147 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tahirarsalan automatictargetdetectionfromsatelliteimageryusingmachinelearning AT munawarhafizsuliman automatictargetdetectionfromsatelliteimageryusingmachinelearning AT akramjunaid automatictargetdetectionfromsatelliteimageryusingmachinelearning AT adilmuhammad automatictargetdetectionfromsatelliteimageryusingmachinelearning AT alishehryar automatictargetdetectionfromsatelliteimageryusingmachinelearning AT kouzaniabbasz automatictargetdetectionfromsatelliteimageryusingmachinelearning AT mahmudmapervez automatictargetdetectionfromsatelliteimageryusingmachinelearning |