Cargando…
Effects of politicized media coverage: Experimental evidence from the HPV vaccine and COVID-19
Although concerns about politicization of health and science are not new, the COVID-19 pandemic has amplified attention to how political disagreement over scientific guidelines and recommendations might influence attitudes and behaviors about the health topics in question and might even spill or car...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8839809/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35168740 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/bs.pmbts.2021.11.008 |
_version_ | 1784650462465622016 |
---|---|
author | Fowler, Erika Franklin Nagler, Rebekah H. Banka, Darshana Gollust, Sarah E. |
author_facet | Fowler, Erika Franklin Nagler, Rebekah H. Banka, Darshana Gollust, Sarah E. |
author_sort | Fowler, Erika Franklin |
collection | PubMed |
description | Although concerns about politicization of health and science are not new, the COVID-19 pandemic has amplified attention to how political disagreement over scientific guidelines and recommendations might influence attitudes and behaviors about the health topics in question and might even spill or carry over to affect other attitudes important to public health. The literature employs differing definitions of politicization—at times referring to controversy in the public sphere, at others referring to the exploitation of the uncertainty inherent in science, and at still others referring to whether the issue enters political discourse—all of which are viewed as distinct dimensions by the public. What is not known is how these different aspects of politicization influence public attitudes about the health topics and or broader attitudes about scientific guidelines, and—assuming adverse effects—what strategies might be effective at mitigating the consequences. This paper draws on a survey experiment of 3012 U.S. respondents fielded in summer 2020 that was designed as a pilot study to assess the effects of different dimensions of politicization. Findings do not suggest that one type of politicization is necessarily more pernicious than the others. In fact, all types of politicization increased negative emotional responses and confusion, both with respect to the health topic in question (HPV vaccine and COVID-19) but also on other domains, although opinions about policy were unaffected. The findings also suggest that inoculation may have potential as a messaging strategy for blunting the adverse effects of exposure to politicization. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8839809 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Elsevier Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88398092022-02-14 Effects of politicized media coverage: Experimental evidence from the HPV vaccine and COVID-19 Fowler, Erika Franklin Nagler, Rebekah H. Banka, Darshana Gollust, Sarah E. Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci Article Although concerns about politicization of health and science are not new, the COVID-19 pandemic has amplified attention to how political disagreement over scientific guidelines and recommendations might influence attitudes and behaviors about the health topics in question and might even spill or carry over to affect other attitudes important to public health. The literature employs differing definitions of politicization—at times referring to controversy in the public sphere, at others referring to the exploitation of the uncertainty inherent in science, and at still others referring to whether the issue enters political discourse—all of which are viewed as distinct dimensions by the public. What is not known is how these different aspects of politicization influence public attitudes about the health topics and or broader attitudes about scientific guidelines, and—assuming adverse effects—what strategies might be effective at mitigating the consequences. This paper draws on a survey experiment of 3012 U.S. respondents fielded in summer 2020 that was designed as a pilot study to assess the effects of different dimensions of politicization. Findings do not suggest that one type of politicization is necessarily more pernicious than the others. In fact, all types of politicization increased negative emotional responses and confusion, both with respect to the health topic in question (HPV vaccine and COVID-19) but also on other domains, although opinions about policy were unaffected. The findings also suggest that inoculation may have potential as a messaging strategy for blunting the adverse effects of exposure to politicization. Elsevier Inc. 2022 2022-01-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8839809/ /pubmed/35168740 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/bs.pmbts.2021.11.008 Text en Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Article Fowler, Erika Franklin Nagler, Rebekah H. Banka, Darshana Gollust, Sarah E. Effects of politicized media coverage: Experimental evidence from the HPV vaccine and COVID-19 |
title | Effects of politicized media coverage: Experimental evidence from the HPV vaccine and COVID-19 |
title_full | Effects of politicized media coverage: Experimental evidence from the HPV vaccine and COVID-19 |
title_fullStr | Effects of politicized media coverage: Experimental evidence from the HPV vaccine and COVID-19 |
title_full_unstemmed | Effects of politicized media coverage: Experimental evidence from the HPV vaccine and COVID-19 |
title_short | Effects of politicized media coverage: Experimental evidence from the HPV vaccine and COVID-19 |
title_sort | effects of politicized media coverage: experimental evidence from the hpv vaccine and covid-19 |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8839809/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35168740 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/bs.pmbts.2021.11.008 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fowlererikafranklin effectsofpoliticizedmediacoverageexperimentalevidencefromthehpvvaccineandcovid19 AT naglerrebekahh effectsofpoliticizedmediacoverageexperimentalevidencefromthehpvvaccineandcovid19 AT bankadarshana effectsofpoliticizedmediacoverageexperimentalevidencefromthehpvvaccineandcovid19 AT gollustsarahe effectsofpoliticizedmediacoverageexperimentalevidencefromthehpvvaccineandcovid19 |