Cargando…
Concentric Scanning Strategies for Laser Powder Bed Fusion: Porosity Distribution in Practical Geometries
Besides the optimisation of process parameters such as laser power or scan speed, the choice of the scan path represents a possibility to optimise the laser powder bed fusion process even further. The usual hatching strategy creates a homogeneous microstructure but makes it necessary to switch the l...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8840123/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35161050 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15031105 |
_version_ | 1784650541623672832 |
---|---|
author | Englert, Lukas Schulze, Volker Dietrich, Stefan |
author_facet | Englert, Lukas Schulze, Volker Dietrich, Stefan |
author_sort | Englert, Lukas |
collection | PubMed |
description | Besides the optimisation of process parameters such as laser power or scan speed, the choice of the scan path represents a possibility to optimise the laser powder bed fusion process even further. The usual hatching strategy creates a homogeneous microstructure but makes it necessary to switch the laser off and on after each scan vector, which can slow down the fabrication. Moreover, the end of each scan vector is a location susceptible to the creation of keyhole pores. In this work, these disadvantages were meant to be avoided by using scan strategies that consist of longer paths and thus less end of track points. To this end, an open-source tool to tailor the LPBF G-code to geometric part features and advanced path configurations was developed and embedded into a co-visualization platform. With this tool, specimens built with four different types of paths were fabricated and the effect of these alternative scan strategies on pore distributions and path neighbourhood was investigated using micro-computed tomography. In the examined example geometry, a spiral scan pattern reduced the distance the laser had to jump between scanning by 78%. However, with the alternative path patterns, the defect architecture was strongly dependant on the part geometry and increased the overall porosity to 0.42%. Respective alleviation approaches are therefore necessary and are discussed in the remainder of this work. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8840123 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88401232022-02-13 Concentric Scanning Strategies for Laser Powder Bed Fusion: Porosity Distribution in Practical Geometries Englert, Lukas Schulze, Volker Dietrich, Stefan Materials (Basel) Article Besides the optimisation of process parameters such as laser power or scan speed, the choice of the scan path represents a possibility to optimise the laser powder bed fusion process even further. The usual hatching strategy creates a homogeneous microstructure but makes it necessary to switch the laser off and on after each scan vector, which can slow down the fabrication. Moreover, the end of each scan vector is a location susceptible to the creation of keyhole pores. In this work, these disadvantages were meant to be avoided by using scan strategies that consist of longer paths and thus less end of track points. To this end, an open-source tool to tailor the LPBF G-code to geometric part features and advanced path configurations was developed and embedded into a co-visualization platform. With this tool, specimens built with four different types of paths were fabricated and the effect of these alternative scan strategies on pore distributions and path neighbourhood was investigated using micro-computed tomography. In the examined example geometry, a spiral scan pattern reduced the distance the laser had to jump between scanning by 78%. However, with the alternative path patterns, the defect architecture was strongly dependant on the part geometry and increased the overall porosity to 0.42%. Respective alleviation approaches are therefore necessary and are discussed in the remainder of this work. MDPI 2022-01-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8840123/ /pubmed/35161050 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15031105 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Englert, Lukas Schulze, Volker Dietrich, Stefan Concentric Scanning Strategies for Laser Powder Bed Fusion: Porosity Distribution in Practical Geometries |
title | Concentric Scanning Strategies for Laser Powder Bed Fusion: Porosity Distribution in Practical Geometries |
title_full | Concentric Scanning Strategies for Laser Powder Bed Fusion: Porosity Distribution in Practical Geometries |
title_fullStr | Concentric Scanning Strategies for Laser Powder Bed Fusion: Porosity Distribution in Practical Geometries |
title_full_unstemmed | Concentric Scanning Strategies for Laser Powder Bed Fusion: Porosity Distribution in Practical Geometries |
title_short | Concentric Scanning Strategies for Laser Powder Bed Fusion: Porosity Distribution in Practical Geometries |
title_sort | concentric scanning strategies for laser powder bed fusion: porosity distribution in practical geometries |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8840123/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35161050 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15031105 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT englertlukas concentricscanningstrategiesforlaserpowderbedfusionporositydistributioninpracticalgeometries AT schulzevolker concentricscanningstrategiesforlaserpowderbedfusionporositydistributioninpracticalgeometries AT dietrichstefan concentricscanningstrategiesforlaserpowderbedfusionporositydistributioninpracticalgeometries |