Cargando…

The Significant Morbidity and Mortality Indicators in Patients of Cirrhosis

Background: Cirrhosis progression varies greatly from patient to patient due to a variety of factors, including hepatic reserve, cirrhosis etiology, and the presence of hepatocellular cancer. As a result, determining a prognosis in a patient with cirrhosis remains a difficult task. For nearly three...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mallik, Manaswinee, Singhai, Abhishek, Khadanga, Sagar, Ingle, Vaibhav
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8841014/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35174029
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.21226
_version_ 1784650744041832448
author Mallik, Manaswinee
Singhai, Abhishek
Khadanga, Sagar
Ingle, Vaibhav
author_facet Mallik, Manaswinee
Singhai, Abhishek
Khadanga, Sagar
Ingle, Vaibhav
author_sort Mallik, Manaswinee
collection PubMed
description Background: Cirrhosis progression varies greatly from patient to patient due to a variety of factors, including hepatic reserve, cirrhosis etiology, and the presence of hepatocellular cancer. As a result, determining a prognosis in a patient with cirrhosis remains a difficult task. For nearly three decades, the Child-Pugh score (CPS) has been the gold standard for determining the prognosis of cirrhosis. In the last two decades, many prognostic models and scores like a model for end-stage liver disease (MELD), chronic liver failure-sequential organ failure assessment (CLIF-SOFA) score, peripheral blood lymphocyte to monocyte ratio (LMR) have been presented to predict prognosis in patients with cirrhosis and to choose the best therapy option. The aim of our study is to determine which score is more effective in predicting three-month mortality and whether these scores are equally effective in predicting short-term outcomes. Materials & methods: In this hospital-based longitudinal study, we analyzed 140 patients with cirrhosis of liver visiting All India Institute of Medical Sciences Bhopal between July 2019 and July 2020. All the 140 patients were followed up for three months to establish short-term outcomes. The blood investigations were done at the time of presentation from all the patients and after three months in the survivors. Various scores were calculated. Results: The majority of patients (47%) were in Child-Pugh class C. Mean MELD score was 13.54, LMR score was 1.96 and CLIF-SOFA score was 5. The total bilirubin, serum creatinine, international normalized ratio (INR), total leukocyte count, absolute monocyte count, CPS, MELD, CLIF-SOFA were significantly higher in a non-surviving group as compared to the surviving group, whereas the albumin and LMR significantly decreased in the non-surviving group. On performing multivariate regression, LMR and CLIF-SOFA were significant independent risk factors of mortality after adjusting for confounding factors. All the parameters had significant discriminatory power to predict mortality. Discriminatory power of CLIF-SOFA (AUC 0.808; 95% CI: 0.733 to 0.870) was excellent and discriminatory power of CPS (AUC 0.792; 95% CI: 0.716 to 0.856), MELD score (AUC 0.765; 95% CI: 0.685 to 0.832) and LMR (AUC 0.75; 95% CI: 0.669 to 0.819) was acceptable. Among all the parameters, CLIF-SOFA was the best predictor of mortality at a cut-off point of >5 with 80.80% chances of correctly predicting mortality. Conclusion: The significant morbidity and mortality indicators are high total bilirubin, high creatinine, high INR, high TLC, low platelet count, and low albumin. Among the various scores, CLIF-SOFA is a better predictor of mortality and morbidity. Low LMR and high CLIF-SOFA are significant independent risk factors of mortality at three months.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8841014
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88410142022-02-15 The Significant Morbidity and Mortality Indicators in Patients of Cirrhosis Mallik, Manaswinee Singhai, Abhishek Khadanga, Sagar Ingle, Vaibhav Cureus Internal Medicine Background: Cirrhosis progression varies greatly from patient to patient due to a variety of factors, including hepatic reserve, cirrhosis etiology, and the presence of hepatocellular cancer. As a result, determining a prognosis in a patient with cirrhosis remains a difficult task. For nearly three decades, the Child-Pugh score (CPS) has been the gold standard for determining the prognosis of cirrhosis. In the last two decades, many prognostic models and scores like a model for end-stage liver disease (MELD), chronic liver failure-sequential organ failure assessment (CLIF-SOFA) score, peripheral blood lymphocyte to monocyte ratio (LMR) have been presented to predict prognosis in patients with cirrhosis and to choose the best therapy option. The aim of our study is to determine which score is more effective in predicting three-month mortality and whether these scores are equally effective in predicting short-term outcomes. Materials & methods: In this hospital-based longitudinal study, we analyzed 140 patients with cirrhosis of liver visiting All India Institute of Medical Sciences Bhopal between July 2019 and July 2020. All the 140 patients were followed up for three months to establish short-term outcomes. The blood investigations were done at the time of presentation from all the patients and after three months in the survivors. Various scores were calculated. Results: The majority of patients (47%) were in Child-Pugh class C. Mean MELD score was 13.54, LMR score was 1.96 and CLIF-SOFA score was 5. The total bilirubin, serum creatinine, international normalized ratio (INR), total leukocyte count, absolute monocyte count, CPS, MELD, CLIF-SOFA were significantly higher in a non-surviving group as compared to the surviving group, whereas the albumin and LMR significantly decreased in the non-surviving group. On performing multivariate regression, LMR and CLIF-SOFA were significant independent risk factors of mortality after adjusting for confounding factors. All the parameters had significant discriminatory power to predict mortality. Discriminatory power of CLIF-SOFA (AUC 0.808; 95% CI: 0.733 to 0.870) was excellent and discriminatory power of CPS (AUC 0.792; 95% CI: 0.716 to 0.856), MELD score (AUC 0.765; 95% CI: 0.685 to 0.832) and LMR (AUC 0.75; 95% CI: 0.669 to 0.819) was acceptable. Among all the parameters, CLIF-SOFA was the best predictor of mortality at a cut-off point of >5 with 80.80% chances of correctly predicting mortality. Conclusion: The significant morbidity and mortality indicators are high total bilirubin, high creatinine, high INR, high TLC, low platelet count, and low albumin. Among the various scores, CLIF-SOFA is a better predictor of mortality and morbidity. Low LMR and high CLIF-SOFA are significant independent risk factors of mortality at three months. Cureus 2022-01-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8841014/ /pubmed/35174029 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.21226 Text en Copyright © 2022, Mallik et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Internal Medicine
Mallik, Manaswinee
Singhai, Abhishek
Khadanga, Sagar
Ingle, Vaibhav
The Significant Morbidity and Mortality Indicators in Patients of Cirrhosis
title The Significant Morbidity and Mortality Indicators in Patients of Cirrhosis
title_full The Significant Morbidity and Mortality Indicators in Patients of Cirrhosis
title_fullStr The Significant Morbidity and Mortality Indicators in Patients of Cirrhosis
title_full_unstemmed The Significant Morbidity and Mortality Indicators in Patients of Cirrhosis
title_short The Significant Morbidity and Mortality Indicators in Patients of Cirrhosis
title_sort significant morbidity and mortality indicators in patients of cirrhosis
topic Internal Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8841014/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35174029
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.21226
work_keys_str_mv AT mallikmanaswinee thesignificantmorbidityandmortalityindicatorsinpatientsofcirrhosis
AT singhaiabhishek thesignificantmorbidityandmortalityindicatorsinpatientsofcirrhosis
AT khadangasagar thesignificantmorbidityandmortalityindicatorsinpatientsofcirrhosis
AT inglevaibhav thesignificantmorbidityandmortalityindicatorsinpatientsofcirrhosis
AT mallikmanaswinee significantmorbidityandmortalityindicatorsinpatientsofcirrhosis
AT singhaiabhishek significantmorbidityandmortalityindicatorsinpatientsofcirrhosis
AT khadangasagar significantmorbidityandmortalityindicatorsinpatientsofcirrhosis
AT inglevaibhav significantmorbidityandmortalityindicatorsinpatientsofcirrhosis