Cargando…

Different lens power calculation formulas for the prediction of refractive outcome after phacoemulsification with silicone oil removal

BACKGROUND: Formulas predicting intraocular lens power have not been compared in silicone oil-tamponaded eyes. The study aims to compare six intraocular lens power assessment formulas in silicone oil-tamponaded eyes. METHODS: This prospective study included patients with silicone oil-tamponaded eyes...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hou, Yanan, Liu, Lei, Wang, Gang, Xie, Junwei, Wang, Yi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8841083/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35151281
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-022-02304-2
_version_ 1784650760259108864
author Hou, Yanan
Liu, Lei
Wang, Gang
Xie, Junwei
Wang, Yi
author_facet Hou, Yanan
Liu, Lei
Wang, Gang
Xie, Junwei
Wang, Yi
author_sort Hou, Yanan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Formulas predicting intraocular lens power have not been compared in silicone oil-tamponaded eyes. The study aims to compare six intraocular lens power assessment formulas in silicone oil-tamponaded eyes. METHODS: This prospective study included patients with silicone oil-tamponaded eyes scheduled for silicone oil removal, phacoemulsification, and intraocular lens implantation at Chongqing Aier Eye Hospital (June 2019 to December 2019). Implanted intraocular lens power was used to predict postsurgical spherical equivalence using SRK/T, Holladay 1, Holladay 2, Haigis, Hoffer Q, and Barrett Universal II, and assess those formula’s predictive accuracy with predictive error. RESULTS: The analysis included 47 eyes in 47 patients (28 and 19 eyes with normal and long axial length, respectively). Postoperative spherical equivalence at 6 months in normal and long axial length eyes was − 0.6 ± 0.96 and − 0.8 ± 1.52 D, respectively. Predictive error values for SRK/T, Holladay 1, Holladay 2, Haigis, and Hoffer Q and Barrett Universal II were − 0.18 ± 0.92, − 0.15 ± 0.88, − 0.06 ± 0.94, − 0.15 ± 0.87, and − 0.05 ± 0.90 D and − 0.06 ± 0.90, respectively, for normal axial length eyes and 0.15 ± 1.16, 0.46 ± 1.17, 0.28 ± 1.11, − 0.04 ± 1.12, 0.49 ± 1.09 D and 0.11 ± 0.99, respectively, for long axial length eyes. For normal axial length eyes, predicted outcomes were similar to actual outcomes for all formulas. For long axial length eyes, predicted outcomes differed significantly from measured postsurgical values for Holladay 1, Holladay 2, and Hoffer Q (P < 0.05) but not SRK/T or Haigis or Barrett Universal II . CONCLUSIONS: The formulas had comparable predictive accuracy in silicone oil-tamponaded eyes with normal axial length, but Haigis or SRK/T or Barrett Universal II may be preferable in long axial length eyes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ChiCTR1900023215.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8841083
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88410832022-02-16 Different lens power calculation formulas for the prediction of refractive outcome after phacoemulsification with silicone oil removal Hou, Yanan Liu, Lei Wang, Gang Xie, Junwei Wang, Yi BMC Ophthalmol Research BACKGROUND: Formulas predicting intraocular lens power have not been compared in silicone oil-tamponaded eyes. The study aims to compare six intraocular lens power assessment formulas in silicone oil-tamponaded eyes. METHODS: This prospective study included patients with silicone oil-tamponaded eyes scheduled for silicone oil removal, phacoemulsification, and intraocular lens implantation at Chongqing Aier Eye Hospital (June 2019 to December 2019). Implanted intraocular lens power was used to predict postsurgical spherical equivalence using SRK/T, Holladay 1, Holladay 2, Haigis, Hoffer Q, and Barrett Universal II, and assess those formula’s predictive accuracy with predictive error. RESULTS: The analysis included 47 eyes in 47 patients (28 and 19 eyes with normal and long axial length, respectively). Postoperative spherical equivalence at 6 months in normal and long axial length eyes was − 0.6 ± 0.96 and − 0.8 ± 1.52 D, respectively. Predictive error values for SRK/T, Holladay 1, Holladay 2, Haigis, and Hoffer Q and Barrett Universal II were − 0.18 ± 0.92, − 0.15 ± 0.88, − 0.06 ± 0.94, − 0.15 ± 0.87, and − 0.05 ± 0.90 D and − 0.06 ± 0.90, respectively, for normal axial length eyes and 0.15 ± 1.16, 0.46 ± 1.17, 0.28 ± 1.11, − 0.04 ± 1.12, 0.49 ± 1.09 D and 0.11 ± 0.99, respectively, for long axial length eyes. For normal axial length eyes, predicted outcomes were similar to actual outcomes for all formulas. For long axial length eyes, predicted outcomes differed significantly from measured postsurgical values for Holladay 1, Holladay 2, and Hoffer Q (P < 0.05) but not SRK/T or Haigis or Barrett Universal II . CONCLUSIONS: The formulas had comparable predictive accuracy in silicone oil-tamponaded eyes with normal axial length, but Haigis or SRK/T or Barrett Universal II may be preferable in long axial length eyes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ChiCTR1900023215. BioMed Central 2022-02-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8841083/ /pubmed/35151281 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-022-02304-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Hou, Yanan
Liu, Lei
Wang, Gang
Xie, Junwei
Wang, Yi
Different lens power calculation formulas for the prediction of refractive outcome after phacoemulsification with silicone oil removal
title Different lens power calculation formulas for the prediction of refractive outcome after phacoemulsification with silicone oil removal
title_full Different lens power calculation formulas for the prediction of refractive outcome after phacoemulsification with silicone oil removal
title_fullStr Different lens power calculation formulas for the prediction of refractive outcome after phacoemulsification with silicone oil removal
title_full_unstemmed Different lens power calculation formulas for the prediction of refractive outcome after phacoemulsification with silicone oil removal
title_short Different lens power calculation formulas for the prediction of refractive outcome after phacoemulsification with silicone oil removal
title_sort different lens power calculation formulas for the prediction of refractive outcome after phacoemulsification with silicone oil removal
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8841083/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35151281
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-022-02304-2
work_keys_str_mv AT houyanan differentlenspowercalculationformulasforthepredictionofrefractiveoutcomeafterphacoemulsificationwithsiliconeoilremoval
AT liulei differentlenspowercalculationformulasforthepredictionofrefractiveoutcomeafterphacoemulsificationwithsiliconeoilremoval
AT wanggang differentlenspowercalculationformulasforthepredictionofrefractiveoutcomeafterphacoemulsificationwithsiliconeoilremoval
AT xiejunwei differentlenspowercalculationformulasforthepredictionofrefractiveoutcomeafterphacoemulsificationwithsiliconeoilremoval
AT wangyi differentlenspowercalculationformulasforthepredictionofrefractiveoutcomeafterphacoemulsificationwithsiliconeoilremoval