Cargando…

Ethics review of COVID-19 human challenge studies: A joint HRA/WHO workshop

This report of a joint World Health Organization (WHO) and United Kingdom (UK) Health Research Authority (HRA) workshop discusses the ethics review of the first COVID-19 human challenge studies, undertaken in the midst of the pandemic. It reviews the early efforts of international and national insti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Williams, Eloise, Craig, Kathrine, Chiu, Christopher, Davies, Hugh, Ellis, Stephanie, Emerson, Claudia, Jamrozik, Euzebiusz, Jefford, Monica, Kang, Gagandeep, Kapulu, Melissa, Kolstoe, Simon E., Littler, Katherine, Lockett, Anthony, Elena Rey, Messer, Janet, McShane, Helen, Saenz, Carla, Selgelid, Michael J., Shah, Seema, Smith, Peter G., Yamazaki, Naho
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier Science 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8841214/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35210119
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.02.004
_version_ 1784650788403937280
author Williams, Eloise
Craig, Kathrine
Chiu, Christopher
Davies, Hugh
Ellis, Stephanie
Emerson, Claudia
Jamrozik, Euzebiusz
Jefford, Monica
Kang, Gagandeep
Kapulu, Melissa
Kolstoe, Simon E.
Littler, Katherine
Lockett, Anthony
Elena Rey
Messer, Janet
McShane, Helen
Saenz, Carla
Selgelid, Michael J.
Shah, Seema
Smith, Peter G.
Yamazaki, Naho
author_facet Williams, Eloise
Craig, Kathrine
Chiu, Christopher
Davies, Hugh
Ellis, Stephanie
Emerson, Claudia
Jamrozik, Euzebiusz
Jefford, Monica
Kang, Gagandeep
Kapulu, Melissa
Kolstoe, Simon E.
Littler, Katherine
Lockett, Anthony
Elena Rey
Messer, Janet
McShane, Helen
Saenz, Carla
Selgelid, Michael J.
Shah, Seema
Smith, Peter G.
Yamazaki, Naho
author_sort Williams, Eloise
collection PubMed
description This report of a joint World Health Organization (WHO) and United Kingdom (UK) Health Research Authority (HRA) workshop discusses the ethics review of the first COVID-19 human challenge studies, undertaken in the midst of the pandemic. It reviews the early efforts of international and national institutions to define the ethical standards required for COVID-19 human challenge studies and create the frameworks to ensure rigorous and timely review of these studies. This report evaluates the utility of the WHO’s international guidance document Key criteria for the ethical acceptability of COVID-19 human challenge studies (WHO Key Criteria) as a practical resource for the ethics review of COVID-19 human challenge studies. It also assesses the UK HRA’s approach to these complex ethics reviews, including the formation of a Specialist Ad-Hoc Research Ethics Committee (REC) for COVID-19 Human Challenge Studies to review all current and future COVID-19 human challenge studies. In addition, the report outlines the reflections of REC members and researchers regarding the ethics review process of the first COVID-19 human challenge studies. Finally, it considers the potential ongoing scientific justification for COVID-19 human challenge studies, particularly in relation to next-generation vaccines and optimisation of vaccination schedules. Overall, there was broad agreement that the WHO Key Criteria represented an international consensus document that played a powerful role in setting norms and delineating the necessary conditions for the ethical acceptability of COVID-19 human challenge studies. Workshop members suggested that the WHO Key Criteria could be practically implemented to support researchers and ethics reviewers, including in the training of ethics committee members. In future, a wider audience may be engaged by the original document and potential additional materials, informed by the experiences of those involved in the first COVID-19 human challenge studies outlined in this document.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8841214
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88412142022-02-14 Ethics review of COVID-19 human challenge studies: A joint HRA/WHO workshop Williams, Eloise Craig, Kathrine Chiu, Christopher Davies, Hugh Ellis, Stephanie Emerson, Claudia Jamrozik, Euzebiusz Jefford, Monica Kang, Gagandeep Kapulu, Melissa Kolstoe, Simon E. Littler, Katherine Lockett, Anthony Elena Rey Messer, Janet McShane, Helen Saenz, Carla Selgelid, Michael J. Shah, Seema Smith, Peter G. Yamazaki, Naho Vaccine Conference Report This report of a joint World Health Organization (WHO) and United Kingdom (UK) Health Research Authority (HRA) workshop discusses the ethics review of the first COVID-19 human challenge studies, undertaken in the midst of the pandemic. It reviews the early efforts of international and national institutions to define the ethical standards required for COVID-19 human challenge studies and create the frameworks to ensure rigorous and timely review of these studies. This report evaluates the utility of the WHO’s international guidance document Key criteria for the ethical acceptability of COVID-19 human challenge studies (WHO Key Criteria) as a practical resource for the ethics review of COVID-19 human challenge studies. It also assesses the UK HRA’s approach to these complex ethics reviews, including the formation of a Specialist Ad-Hoc Research Ethics Committee (REC) for COVID-19 Human Challenge Studies to review all current and future COVID-19 human challenge studies. In addition, the report outlines the reflections of REC members and researchers regarding the ethics review process of the first COVID-19 human challenge studies. Finally, it considers the potential ongoing scientific justification for COVID-19 human challenge studies, particularly in relation to next-generation vaccines and optimisation of vaccination schedules. Overall, there was broad agreement that the WHO Key Criteria represented an international consensus document that played a powerful role in setting norms and delineating the necessary conditions for the ethical acceptability of COVID-19 human challenge studies. Workshop members suggested that the WHO Key Criteria could be practically implemented to support researchers and ethics reviewers, including in the training of ethics committee members. In future, a wider audience may be engaged by the original document and potential additional materials, informed by the experiences of those involved in the first COVID-19 human challenge studies outlined in this document. Elsevier Science 2022-06-09 2022-02-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8841214/ /pubmed/35210119 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.02.004 Text en Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Conference Report
Williams, Eloise
Craig, Kathrine
Chiu, Christopher
Davies, Hugh
Ellis, Stephanie
Emerson, Claudia
Jamrozik, Euzebiusz
Jefford, Monica
Kang, Gagandeep
Kapulu, Melissa
Kolstoe, Simon E.
Littler, Katherine
Lockett, Anthony
Elena Rey
Messer, Janet
McShane, Helen
Saenz, Carla
Selgelid, Michael J.
Shah, Seema
Smith, Peter G.
Yamazaki, Naho
Ethics review of COVID-19 human challenge studies: A joint HRA/WHO workshop
title Ethics review of COVID-19 human challenge studies: A joint HRA/WHO workshop
title_full Ethics review of COVID-19 human challenge studies: A joint HRA/WHO workshop
title_fullStr Ethics review of COVID-19 human challenge studies: A joint HRA/WHO workshop
title_full_unstemmed Ethics review of COVID-19 human challenge studies: A joint HRA/WHO workshop
title_short Ethics review of COVID-19 human challenge studies: A joint HRA/WHO workshop
title_sort ethics review of covid-19 human challenge studies: a joint hra/who workshop
topic Conference Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8841214/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35210119
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.02.004
work_keys_str_mv AT williamseloise ethicsreviewofcovid19humanchallengestudiesajointhrawhoworkshop
AT craigkathrine ethicsreviewofcovid19humanchallengestudiesajointhrawhoworkshop
AT chiuchristopher ethicsreviewofcovid19humanchallengestudiesajointhrawhoworkshop
AT davieshugh ethicsreviewofcovid19humanchallengestudiesajointhrawhoworkshop
AT ellisstephanie ethicsreviewofcovid19humanchallengestudiesajointhrawhoworkshop
AT emersonclaudia ethicsreviewofcovid19humanchallengestudiesajointhrawhoworkshop
AT jamrozikeuzebiusz ethicsreviewofcovid19humanchallengestudiesajointhrawhoworkshop
AT jeffordmonica ethicsreviewofcovid19humanchallengestudiesajointhrawhoworkshop
AT kanggagandeep ethicsreviewofcovid19humanchallengestudiesajointhrawhoworkshop
AT kapulumelissa ethicsreviewofcovid19humanchallengestudiesajointhrawhoworkshop
AT kolstoesimone ethicsreviewofcovid19humanchallengestudiesajointhrawhoworkshop
AT littlerkatherine ethicsreviewofcovid19humanchallengestudiesajointhrawhoworkshop
AT lockettanthony ethicsreviewofcovid19humanchallengestudiesajointhrawhoworkshop
AT elenarey ethicsreviewofcovid19humanchallengestudiesajointhrawhoworkshop
AT messerjanet ethicsreviewofcovid19humanchallengestudiesajointhrawhoworkshop
AT mcshanehelen ethicsreviewofcovid19humanchallengestudiesajointhrawhoworkshop
AT saenzcarla ethicsreviewofcovid19humanchallengestudiesajointhrawhoworkshop
AT selgelidmichaelj ethicsreviewofcovid19humanchallengestudiesajointhrawhoworkshop
AT shahseema ethicsreviewofcovid19humanchallengestudiesajointhrawhoworkshop
AT smithpeterg ethicsreviewofcovid19humanchallengestudiesajointhrawhoworkshop
AT yamazakinaho ethicsreviewofcovid19humanchallengestudiesajointhrawhoworkshop