Cargando…

Mini versus ultra-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy in a paediatric population

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether there would be a difference in outcome when the smaller ultra-mini 12 Fr sheath was used instead of the mini 16 Fr sheath for percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in paediatric patients for stones less than 25 mm. METHODS: This was a prospective cohort study of patients...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mishra, Dilip K., Bhatt, Sonia, Palaniappan, Sundaram, Reddy, Talamanchi V.K., Rajenthiran, Vinothkumar, Sreeranga, Y.L., Agrawal, Madhu S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Second Military Medical University 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8841280/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35198400
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajur.2021.06.002
_version_ 1784650803153207296
author Mishra, Dilip K.
Bhatt, Sonia
Palaniappan, Sundaram
Reddy, Talamanchi V.K.
Rajenthiran, Vinothkumar
Sreeranga, Y.L.
Agrawal, Madhu S.
author_facet Mishra, Dilip K.
Bhatt, Sonia
Palaniappan, Sundaram
Reddy, Talamanchi V.K.
Rajenthiran, Vinothkumar
Sreeranga, Y.L.
Agrawal, Madhu S.
author_sort Mishra, Dilip K.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether there would be a difference in outcome when the smaller ultra-mini 12 Fr sheath was used instead of the mini 16 Fr sheath for percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in paediatric patients for stones less than 25 mm. METHODS: This was a prospective cohort study of patients who underwent PCNL in our hospital in a 2-year period from July 2016 to June 2018 by a single surgeon. PCNL was performed in a prone position and tract was dilated to the respective size using single step dilatation. Laser was used to fragment the stone. Stone-free outcome was defined as absence of stone fragment at 3 months on kidney, ureter, and bladder X-ray. RESULTS: There were 40 patients in each group. Mean stone size was comparable between the two groups (14.5 mm vs. 15.0 mm). The procedure was completed faster in the 16 Fr group compared to 12 Fr group (24.5 min vs. 34.6 min). Stone clearance was highly successful in both groups (97.5% vs. 95.0%). There was no difference in complications between the two groups. The decrease in hemoglobin was minimal in both groups (0.2 g/dL vs. 0.3 g/dL). CONCLUSION: We found that the success rates were similar in both mini PCNL and the smaller ultra-mini PCNL groups. No significant difference in bleeding was noted in our pilot study, however, operative time was longer in the ultra-mini group as compared to the mini sheath group.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8841280
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Second Military Medical University
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88412802022-02-22 Mini versus ultra-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy in a paediatric population Mishra, Dilip K. Bhatt, Sonia Palaniappan, Sundaram Reddy, Talamanchi V.K. Rajenthiran, Vinothkumar Sreeranga, Y.L. Agrawal, Madhu S. Asian J Urol Original Article OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether there would be a difference in outcome when the smaller ultra-mini 12 Fr sheath was used instead of the mini 16 Fr sheath for percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in paediatric patients for stones less than 25 mm. METHODS: This was a prospective cohort study of patients who underwent PCNL in our hospital in a 2-year period from July 2016 to June 2018 by a single surgeon. PCNL was performed in a prone position and tract was dilated to the respective size using single step dilatation. Laser was used to fragment the stone. Stone-free outcome was defined as absence of stone fragment at 3 months on kidney, ureter, and bladder X-ray. RESULTS: There were 40 patients in each group. Mean stone size was comparable between the two groups (14.5 mm vs. 15.0 mm). The procedure was completed faster in the 16 Fr group compared to 12 Fr group (24.5 min vs. 34.6 min). Stone clearance was highly successful in both groups (97.5% vs. 95.0%). There was no difference in complications between the two groups. The decrease in hemoglobin was minimal in both groups (0.2 g/dL vs. 0.3 g/dL). CONCLUSION: We found that the success rates were similar in both mini PCNL and the smaller ultra-mini PCNL groups. No significant difference in bleeding was noted in our pilot study, however, operative time was longer in the ultra-mini group as compared to the mini sheath group. Second Military Medical University 2022-01 2021-06-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8841280/ /pubmed/35198400 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajur.2021.06.002 Text en © 2022 Editorial Office of Asian Journal of Urology. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Mishra, Dilip K.
Bhatt, Sonia
Palaniappan, Sundaram
Reddy, Talamanchi V.K.
Rajenthiran, Vinothkumar
Sreeranga, Y.L.
Agrawal, Madhu S.
Mini versus ultra-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy in a paediatric population
title Mini versus ultra-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy in a paediatric population
title_full Mini versus ultra-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy in a paediatric population
title_fullStr Mini versus ultra-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy in a paediatric population
title_full_unstemmed Mini versus ultra-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy in a paediatric population
title_short Mini versus ultra-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy in a paediatric population
title_sort mini versus ultra-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy in a paediatric population
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8841280/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35198400
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajur.2021.06.002
work_keys_str_mv AT mishradilipk miniversusultraminipercutaneousnephrolithotomyinapaediatricpopulation
AT bhattsonia miniversusultraminipercutaneousnephrolithotomyinapaediatricpopulation
AT palaniappansundaram miniversusultraminipercutaneousnephrolithotomyinapaediatricpopulation
AT reddytalamanchivk miniversusultraminipercutaneousnephrolithotomyinapaediatricpopulation
AT rajenthiranvinothkumar miniversusultraminipercutaneousnephrolithotomyinapaediatricpopulation
AT sreerangayl miniversusultraminipercutaneousnephrolithotomyinapaediatricpopulation
AT agrawalmadhus miniversusultraminipercutaneousnephrolithotomyinapaediatricpopulation