Cargando…

A Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Different Concentrations of Chloroprocaine with Lidocaine for Activating Epidural Analgesia During Labor

PURPOSE: This study aimed to explore the efficacy and safety of chloroprocaine for activating labor analgesia and the optimal concentration compared to lidocaine. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Ninety-six nulliparous parturients were randomly assigned to three groups: LD group, patients received the conventi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhu, Hai-Juan, He, Yan, Wang, Sheng-You, Han, Bo, Zhang, Ye
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8841447/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35173469
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S351030
_version_ 1784650838524821504
author Zhu, Hai-Juan
He, Yan
Wang, Sheng-You
Han, Bo
Zhang, Ye
author_facet Zhu, Hai-Juan
He, Yan
Wang, Sheng-You
Han, Bo
Zhang, Ye
author_sort Zhu, Hai-Juan
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: This study aimed to explore the efficacy and safety of chloroprocaine for activating labor analgesia and the optimal concentration compared to lidocaine. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Ninety-six nulliparous parturients were randomly assigned to three groups: LD group, patients received the conventional initial dose of 6 mL of 1% lidocaine; CP1.5 group, patients received 6 mL of 1.5% chloroprocaine as the initial dose; and CP1.2 group, patients received 7.5 mL of 1.2% chloroprocaine as initial dose. Labor analgesia was maintained in all patients via a programmed intermittent epidural bolus (PIEB). The primary outcome was the analgesia onset time. Secondary outcomes included the visual analog scale (VAS) scores, the interval and duration of uterine contractions during the first 12 contractions, failure to reach adequate analgesia, labor and neonatal outcomes, maternal satisfaction and adverse effects. RESULTS: Parturients in the CP1.5 and CP1.2 groups achieved a shorter onset time than those in the LD group (hazard ratio (HR) = 6.540; 95% confidence interval (CI), 3.503–12.210; P < 0.001 and HR = 3.460; 95% CI, 1.905–6.282; P < 0.001, respectively). The median time (95% CIs) to adequate analgesia was 12.0 (10.9–13.1), 7.0 (6.2–7.8) and 8.0 (7.5–8.5) minutes in the LD, CP1.5 and CP1.2 groups, respectively. PIEB in the CP1.5 group was associated with lower VAS scores, patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) boluses, and analgesic consumption; a shorter time from epidural initiation to the first PCEA demand; and higher maternal satisfaction scores than the other two groups (P < 0.01). The interval and duration of uterine contractions, labor and newborn outcomes and adverse effects were comparable among the three groups. CONCLUSION: Chloroprocaine provided a faster onset of labor analgesia than lidocaine. Thus, 6 mL of 1.5% chloroprocaine might be a superior volume and concentration regimen to 7.5 mL of 1.2% chloroprocaine for activating labor analgesia. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION STATEMENT: The study was registered prior to subject enrollment at www.chictr.org.cn (ChiCTR2100049113).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8841447
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88414472022-02-15 A Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Different Concentrations of Chloroprocaine with Lidocaine for Activating Epidural Analgesia During Labor Zhu, Hai-Juan He, Yan Wang, Sheng-You Han, Bo Zhang, Ye Int J Gen Med Clinical Trial Report PURPOSE: This study aimed to explore the efficacy and safety of chloroprocaine for activating labor analgesia and the optimal concentration compared to lidocaine. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Ninety-six nulliparous parturients were randomly assigned to three groups: LD group, patients received the conventional initial dose of 6 mL of 1% lidocaine; CP1.5 group, patients received 6 mL of 1.5% chloroprocaine as the initial dose; and CP1.2 group, patients received 7.5 mL of 1.2% chloroprocaine as initial dose. Labor analgesia was maintained in all patients via a programmed intermittent epidural bolus (PIEB). The primary outcome was the analgesia onset time. Secondary outcomes included the visual analog scale (VAS) scores, the interval and duration of uterine contractions during the first 12 contractions, failure to reach adequate analgesia, labor and neonatal outcomes, maternal satisfaction and adverse effects. RESULTS: Parturients in the CP1.5 and CP1.2 groups achieved a shorter onset time than those in the LD group (hazard ratio (HR) = 6.540; 95% confidence interval (CI), 3.503–12.210; P < 0.001 and HR = 3.460; 95% CI, 1.905–6.282; P < 0.001, respectively). The median time (95% CIs) to adequate analgesia was 12.0 (10.9–13.1), 7.0 (6.2–7.8) and 8.0 (7.5–8.5) minutes in the LD, CP1.5 and CP1.2 groups, respectively. PIEB in the CP1.5 group was associated with lower VAS scores, patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) boluses, and analgesic consumption; a shorter time from epidural initiation to the first PCEA demand; and higher maternal satisfaction scores than the other two groups (P < 0.01). The interval and duration of uterine contractions, labor and newborn outcomes and adverse effects were comparable among the three groups. CONCLUSION: Chloroprocaine provided a faster onset of labor analgesia than lidocaine. Thus, 6 mL of 1.5% chloroprocaine might be a superior volume and concentration regimen to 7.5 mL of 1.2% chloroprocaine for activating labor analgesia. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION STATEMENT: The study was registered prior to subject enrollment at www.chictr.org.cn (ChiCTR2100049113). Dove 2022-02-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8841447/ /pubmed/35173469 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S351030 Text en © 2022 Zhu et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Clinical Trial Report
Zhu, Hai-Juan
He, Yan
Wang, Sheng-You
Han, Bo
Zhang, Ye
A Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Different Concentrations of Chloroprocaine with Lidocaine for Activating Epidural Analgesia During Labor
title A Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Different Concentrations of Chloroprocaine with Lidocaine for Activating Epidural Analgesia During Labor
title_full A Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Different Concentrations of Chloroprocaine with Lidocaine for Activating Epidural Analgesia During Labor
title_fullStr A Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Different Concentrations of Chloroprocaine with Lidocaine for Activating Epidural Analgesia During Labor
title_full_unstemmed A Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Different Concentrations of Chloroprocaine with Lidocaine for Activating Epidural Analgesia During Labor
title_short A Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Different Concentrations of Chloroprocaine with Lidocaine for Activating Epidural Analgesia During Labor
title_sort randomized clinical trial comparing different concentrations of chloroprocaine with lidocaine for activating epidural analgesia during labor
topic Clinical Trial Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8841447/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35173469
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S351030
work_keys_str_mv AT zhuhaijuan arandomizedclinicaltrialcomparingdifferentconcentrationsofchloroprocainewithlidocaineforactivatingepiduralanalgesiaduringlabor
AT heyan arandomizedclinicaltrialcomparingdifferentconcentrationsofchloroprocainewithlidocaineforactivatingepiduralanalgesiaduringlabor
AT wangshengyou arandomizedclinicaltrialcomparingdifferentconcentrationsofchloroprocainewithlidocaineforactivatingepiduralanalgesiaduringlabor
AT hanbo arandomizedclinicaltrialcomparingdifferentconcentrationsofchloroprocainewithlidocaineforactivatingepiduralanalgesiaduringlabor
AT zhangye arandomizedclinicaltrialcomparingdifferentconcentrationsofchloroprocainewithlidocaineforactivatingepiduralanalgesiaduringlabor
AT zhuhaijuan randomizedclinicaltrialcomparingdifferentconcentrationsofchloroprocainewithlidocaineforactivatingepiduralanalgesiaduringlabor
AT heyan randomizedclinicaltrialcomparingdifferentconcentrationsofchloroprocainewithlidocaineforactivatingepiduralanalgesiaduringlabor
AT wangshengyou randomizedclinicaltrialcomparingdifferentconcentrationsofchloroprocainewithlidocaineforactivatingepiduralanalgesiaduringlabor
AT hanbo randomizedclinicaltrialcomparingdifferentconcentrationsofchloroprocainewithlidocaineforactivatingepiduralanalgesiaduringlabor
AT zhangye randomizedclinicaltrialcomparingdifferentconcentrationsofchloroprocainewithlidocaineforactivatingepiduralanalgesiaduringlabor