Cargando…
Does a Small Body Have a Negative Impact on Minimally Invasive Mitral Valve Surgery?
BACKGROUNDS: Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery (MIMVS) in patients with a small body presents surgeons with a technically difficult surgical maneuver. We hypothesized that physique might negatively influence the safety and technical complexity of MIMVS. METHODS: One hundred and twenty-one pati...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8841515/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35174202 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2021.746302 |
_version_ | 1784650854672891904 |
---|---|
author | Shirasaka, Tomonori Kunioka, Shingo Kikuchi, Yuta Isikawa, Natsuya Kanda, Hirotsugu Kamiya, Hiroyuki |
author_facet | Shirasaka, Tomonori Kunioka, Shingo Kikuchi, Yuta Isikawa, Natsuya Kanda, Hirotsugu Kamiya, Hiroyuki |
author_sort | Shirasaka, Tomonori |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUNDS: Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery (MIMVS) in patients with a small body presents surgeons with a technically difficult surgical maneuver. We hypothesized that physique might negatively influence the safety and technical complexity of MIMVS. METHODS: One hundred and twenty-one patients underwent MIMVS in our institution between May 2014 and April 2020. These patients were categorized into two groups. The first group was the small physique group (n = 20) consisting of patients with a stature <150 cm. The second group was the normal physique group (n = 101) consisting of patients with a stature >150 cm. The primary endpoint was freedom from death and major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE). The secondary endpoint was freedom from moderate or severe mitral regurgitation. RESULTS: Cardiopulmonary bypass time (130 ± 29 vs. 156 ± 55 min, p = 0.02) and aortic cross-clamp time (75 ± 27 vs. 95 ± 39 min, p = 0.03) were significantly shorter in the small physique group. Both in the early and midterm periods, there was no significant difference in the mortality (early, 5.0 vs. 1.0%, p = 0.30. midterm, 5.0 vs. 1.0%, p = 0.09), MACCE (early, 5.0 vs. 6.9%, p = 0.65. midterm, 5.0 vs. 5.9%, p = 0.93) and the residual MR (early, 0 vs. 1.0%, p = 0.66. midterm, 5.0 vs. 4.9%, p = 0.93) between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Small physique is not a hurdle for MIMVS in terms of the safety of the operation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8841515 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88415152022-02-15 Does a Small Body Have a Negative Impact on Minimally Invasive Mitral Valve Surgery? Shirasaka, Tomonori Kunioka, Shingo Kikuchi, Yuta Isikawa, Natsuya Kanda, Hirotsugu Kamiya, Hiroyuki Front Surg Surgery BACKGROUNDS: Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery (MIMVS) in patients with a small body presents surgeons with a technically difficult surgical maneuver. We hypothesized that physique might negatively influence the safety and technical complexity of MIMVS. METHODS: One hundred and twenty-one patients underwent MIMVS in our institution between May 2014 and April 2020. These patients were categorized into two groups. The first group was the small physique group (n = 20) consisting of patients with a stature <150 cm. The second group was the normal physique group (n = 101) consisting of patients with a stature >150 cm. The primary endpoint was freedom from death and major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE). The secondary endpoint was freedom from moderate or severe mitral regurgitation. RESULTS: Cardiopulmonary bypass time (130 ± 29 vs. 156 ± 55 min, p = 0.02) and aortic cross-clamp time (75 ± 27 vs. 95 ± 39 min, p = 0.03) were significantly shorter in the small physique group. Both in the early and midterm periods, there was no significant difference in the mortality (early, 5.0 vs. 1.0%, p = 0.30. midterm, 5.0 vs. 1.0%, p = 0.09), MACCE (early, 5.0 vs. 6.9%, p = 0.65. midterm, 5.0 vs. 5.9%, p = 0.93) and the residual MR (early, 0 vs. 1.0%, p = 0.66. midterm, 5.0 vs. 4.9%, p = 0.93) between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Small physique is not a hurdle for MIMVS in terms of the safety of the operation. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-01-31 /pmc/articles/PMC8841515/ /pubmed/35174202 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2021.746302 Text en Copyright © 2022 Shirasaka, Kunioka, Kikuchi, Isikawa, Kanda and Kamiya. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Surgery Shirasaka, Tomonori Kunioka, Shingo Kikuchi, Yuta Isikawa, Natsuya Kanda, Hirotsugu Kamiya, Hiroyuki Does a Small Body Have a Negative Impact on Minimally Invasive Mitral Valve Surgery? |
title | Does a Small Body Have a Negative Impact on Minimally Invasive Mitral Valve Surgery? |
title_full | Does a Small Body Have a Negative Impact on Minimally Invasive Mitral Valve Surgery? |
title_fullStr | Does a Small Body Have a Negative Impact on Minimally Invasive Mitral Valve Surgery? |
title_full_unstemmed | Does a Small Body Have a Negative Impact on Minimally Invasive Mitral Valve Surgery? |
title_short | Does a Small Body Have a Negative Impact on Minimally Invasive Mitral Valve Surgery? |
title_sort | does a small body have a negative impact on minimally invasive mitral valve surgery? |
topic | Surgery |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8841515/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35174202 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2021.746302 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shirasakatomonori doesasmallbodyhaveanegativeimpactonminimallyinvasivemitralvalvesurgery AT kuniokashingo doesasmallbodyhaveanegativeimpactonminimallyinvasivemitralvalvesurgery AT kikuchiyuta doesasmallbodyhaveanegativeimpactonminimallyinvasivemitralvalvesurgery AT isikawanatsuya doesasmallbodyhaveanegativeimpactonminimallyinvasivemitralvalvesurgery AT kandahirotsugu doesasmallbodyhaveanegativeimpactonminimallyinvasivemitralvalvesurgery AT kamiyahiroyuki doesasmallbodyhaveanegativeimpactonminimallyinvasivemitralvalvesurgery |