Cargando…

Does a Small Body Have a Negative Impact on Minimally Invasive Mitral Valve Surgery?

BACKGROUNDS: Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery (MIMVS) in patients with a small body presents surgeons with a technically difficult surgical maneuver. We hypothesized that physique might negatively influence the safety and technical complexity of MIMVS. METHODS: One hundred and twenty-one pati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shirasaka, Tomonori, Kunioka, Shingo, Kikuchi, Yuta, Isikawa, Natsuya, Kanda, Hirotsugu, Kamiya, Hiroyuki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8841515/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35174202
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2021.746302
_version_ 1784650854672891904
author Shirasaka, Tomonori
Kunioka, Shingo
Kikuchi, Yuta
Isikawa, Natsuya
Kanda, Hirotsugu
Kamiya, Hiroyuki
author_facet Shirasaka, Tomonori
Kunioka, Shingo
Kikuchi, Yuta
Isikawa, Natsuya
Kanda, Hirotsugu
Kamiya, Hiroyuki
author_sort Shirasaka, Tomonori
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUNDS: Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery (MIMVS) in patients with a small body presents surgeons with a technically difficult surgical maneuver. We hypothesized that physique might negatively influence the safety and technical complexity of MIMVS. METHODS: One hundred and twenty-one patients underwent MIMVS in our institution between May 2014 and April 2020. These patients were categorized into two groups. The first group was the small physique group (n = 20) consisting of patients with a stature <150 cm. The second group was the normal physique group (n = 101) consisting of patients with a stature >150 cm. The primary endpoint was freedom from death and major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE). The secondary endpoint was freedom from moderate or severe mitral regurgitation. RESULTS: Cardiopulmonary bypass time (130 ± 29 vs. 156 ± 55 min, p = 0.02) and aortic cross-clamp time (75 ± 27 vs. 95 ± 39 min, p = 0.03) were significantly shorter in the small physique group. Both in the early and midterm periods, there was no significant difference in the mortality (early, 5.0 vs. 1.0%, p = 0.30. midterm, 5.0 vs. 1.0%, p = 0.09), MACCE (early, 5.0 vs. 6.9%, p = 0.65. midterm, 5.0 vs. 5.9%, p = 0.93) and the residual MR (early, 0 vs. 1.0%, p = 0.66. midterm, 5.0 vs. 4.9%, p = 0.93) between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Small physique is not a hurdle for MIMVS in terms of the safety of the operation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8841515
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88415152022-02-15 Does a Small Body Have a Negative Impact on Minimally Invasive Mitral Valve Surgery? Shirasaka, Tomonori Kunioka, Shingo Kikuchi, Yuta Isikawa, Natsuya Kanda, Hirotsugu Kamiya, Hiroyuki Front Surg Surgery BACKGROUNDS: Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery (MIMVS) in patients with a small body presents surgeons with a technically difficult surgical maneuver. We hypothesized that physique might negatively influence the safety and technical complexity of MIMVS. METHODS: One hundred and twenty-one patients underwent MIMVS in our institution between May 2014 and April 2020. These patients were categorized into two groups. The first group was the small physique group (n = 20) consisting of patients with a stature <150 cm. The second group was the normal physique group (n = 101) consisting of patients with a stature >150 cm. The primary endpoint was freedom from death and major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE). The secondary endpoint was freedom from moderate or severe mitral regurgitation. RESULTS: Cardiopulmonary bypass time (130 ± 29 vs. 156 ± 55 min, p = 0.02) and aortic cross-clamp time (75 ± 27 vs. 95 ± 39 min, p = 0.03) were significantly shorter in the small physique group. Both in the early and midterm periods, there was no significant difference in the mortality (early, 5.0 vs. 1.0%, p = 0.30. midterm, 5.0 vs. 1.0%, p = 0.09), MACCE (early, 5.0 vs. 6.9%, p = 0.65. midterm, 5.0 vs. 5.9%, p = 0.93) and the residual MR (early, 0 vs. 1.0%, p = 0.66. midterm, 5.0 vs. 4.9%, p = 0.93) between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Small physique is not a hurdle for MIMVS in terms of the safety of the operation. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-01-31 /pmc/articles/PMC8841515/ /pubmed/35174202 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2021.746302 Text en Copyright © 2022 Shirasaka, Kunioka, Kikuchi, Isikawa, Kanda and Kamiya. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Surgery
Shirasaka, Tomonori
Kunioka, Shingo
Kikuchi, Yuta
Isikawa, Natsuya
Kanda, Hirotsugu
Kamiya, Hiroyuki
Does a Small Body Have a Negative Impact on Minimally Invasive Mitral Valve Surgery?
title Does a Small Body Have a Negative Impact on Minimally Invasive Mitral Valve Surgery?
title_full Does a Small Body Have a Negative Impact on Minimally Invasive Mitral Valve Surgery?
title_fullStr Does a Small Body Have a Negative Impact on Minimally Invasive Mitral Valve Surgery?
title_full_unstemmed Does a Small Body Have a Negative Impact on Minimally Invasive Mitral Valve Surgery?
title_short Does a Small Body Have a Negative Impact on Minimally Invasive Mitral Valve Surgery?
title_sort does a small body have a negative impact on minimally invasive mitral valve surgery?
topic Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8841515/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35174202
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2021.746302
work_keys_str_mv AT shirasakatomonori doesasmallbodyhaveanegativeimpactonminimallyinvasivemitralvalvesurgery
AT kuniokashingo doesasmallbodyhaveanegativeimpactonminimallyinvasivemitralvalvesurgery
AT kikuchiyuta doesasmallbodyhaveanegativeimpactonminimallyinvasivemitralvalvesurgery
AT isikawanatsuya doesasmallbodyhaveanegativeimpactonminimallyinvasivemitralvalvesurgery
AT kandahirotsugu doesasmallbodyhaveanegativeimpactonminimallyinvasivemitralvalvesurgery
AT kamiyahiroyuki doesasmallbodyhaveanegativeimpactonminimallyinvasivemitralvalvesurgery