Cargando…

One‐step and sequential SARSCOV‐2 polymerase chain reaction tests would not work every time

INTRODUCTION: RT‐PCR is widely used as a diagnostic test for the detection of SARS‐CoV‐2. In this study, we aim to describe the clinical utility of serial PCR testing in the final detection of COVID‐19. METHOD: We collected multiple nasopharyngeal swab samples from patients who had negative RT‐PCR t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hatami, Firouze, Rabiei, Mohammad Mahdi, Javandoust Gharehbagh, Farid, Pourhoseingholi, Mohamad Amin, Sabeti, Shahram, Kheyrian, Mahnaz, Alavi Darazam, Ilad
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8842140/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34997789
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcla.24226
_version_ 1784650991612723200
author Hatami, Firouze
Rabiei, Mohammad Mahdi
Javandoust Gharehbagh, Farid
Pourhoseingholi, Mohamad Amin
Sabeti, Shahram
Kheyrian, Mahnaz
Alavi Darazam, Ilad
author_facet Hatami, Firouze
Rabiei, Mohammad Mahdi
Javandoust Gharehbagh, Farid
Pourhoseingholi, Mohamad Amin
Sabeti, Shahram
Kheyrian, Mahnaz
Alavi Darazam, Ilad
author_sort Hatami, Firouze
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: RT‐PCR is widely used as a diagnostic test for the detection of SARS‐CoV‐2. In this study, we aim to describe the clinical utility of serial PCR testing in the final detection of COVID‐19. METHOD: We collected multiple nasopharyngeal swab samples from patients who had negative RT‐PCR test on the first day after hospitalization. RT‐PCR tests were performed on the second day for all patients with initial negative result. For the patients with secondary negative results on day 2, tertiary RT‐PCR tests were performed on day 3 after hospitalization. RESULT: Among 68 patients with initial negative test results, at the end of follow‐up, the mortality number was 20 (29.4%). About 33.8% of patients had subsequent positive PCR test results for the second time and 17.4% of the patients who performed third PCR test had positive result. CONCLUSION: Based on this study, serial RT‐PCR testing is unlikely to yield additional information.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8842140
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88421402022-02-22 One‐step and sequential SARSCOV‐2 polymerase chain reaction tests would not work every time Hatami, Firouze Rabiei, Mohammad Mahdi Javandoust Gharehbagh, Farid Pourhoseingholi, Mohamad Amin Sabeti, Shahram Kheyrian, Mahnaz Alavi Darazam, Ilad J Clin Lab Anal Research Articles INTRODUCTION: RT‐PCR is widely used as a diagnostic test for the detection of SARS‐CoV‐2. In this study, we aim to describe the clinical utility of serial PCR testing in the final detection of COVID‐19. METHOD: We collected multiple nasopharyngeal swab samples from patients who had negative RT‐PCR test on the first day after hospitalization. RT‐PCR tests were performed on the second day for all patients with initial negative result. For the patients with secondary negative results on day 2, tertiary RT‐PCR tests were performed on day 3 after hospitalization. RESULT: Among 68 patients with initial negative test results, at the end of follow‐up, the mortality number was 20 (29.4%). About 33.8% of patients had subsequent positive PCR test results for the second time and 17.4% of the patients who performed third PCR test had positive result. CONCLUSION: Based on this study, serial RT‐PCR testing is unlikely to yield additional information. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-01-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8842140/ /pubmed/34997789 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcla.24226 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Hatami, Firouze
Rabiei, Mohammad Mahdi
Javandoust Gharehbagh, Farid
Pourhoseingholi, Mohamad Amin
Sabeti, Shahram
Kheyrian, Mahnaz
Alavi Darazam, Ilad
One‐step and sequential SARSCOV‐2 polymerase chain reaction tests would not work every time
title One‐step and sequential SARSCOV‐2 polymerase chain reaction tests would not work every time
title_full One‐step and sequential SARSCOV‐2 polymerase chain reaction tests would not work every time
title_fullStr One‐step and sequential SARSCOV‐2 polymerase chain reaction tests would not work every time
title_full_unstemmed One‐step and sequential SARSCOV‐2 polymerase chain reaction tests would not work every time
title_short One‐step and sequential SARSCOV‐2 polymerase chain reaction tests would not work every time
title_sort one‐step and sequential sarscov‐2 polymerase chain reaction tests would not work every time
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8842140/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34997789
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcla.24226
work_keys_str_mv AT hatamifirouze onestepandsequentialsarscov2polymerasechainreactiontestswouldnotworkeverytime
AT rabieimohammadmahdi onestepandsequentialsarscov2polymerasechainreactiontestswouldnotworkeverytime
AT javandoustgharehbaghfarid onestepandsequentialsarscov2polymerasechainreactiontestswouldnotworkeverytime
AT pourhoseingholimohamadamin onestepandsequentialsarscov2polymerasechainreactiontestswouldnotworkeverytime
AT sabetishahram onestepandsequentialsarscov2polymerasechainreactiontestswouldnotworkeverytime
AT kheyrianmahnaz onestepandsequentialsarscov2polymerasechainreactiontestswouldnotworkeverytime
AT alavidarazamilad onestepandsequentialsarscov2polymerasechainreactiontestswouldnotworkeverytime