Cargando…
One‐step and sequential SARSCOV‐2 polymerase chain reaction tests would not work every time
INTRODUCTION: RT‐PCR is widely used as a diagnostic test for the detection of SARS‐CoV‐2. In this study, we aim to describe the clinical utility of serial PCR testing in the final detection of COVID‐19. METHOD: We collected multiple nasopharyngeal swab samples from patients who had negative RT‐PCR t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8842140/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34997789 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcla.24226 |
_version_ | 1784650991612723200 |
---|---|
author | Hatami, Firouze Rabiei, Mohammad Mahdi Javandoust Gharehbagh, Farid Pourhoseingholi, Mohamad Amin Sabeti, Shahram Kheyrian, Mahnaz Alavi Darazam, Ilad |
author_facet | Hatami, Firouze Rabiei, Mohammad Mahdi Javandoust Gharehbagh, Farid Pourhoseingholi, Mohamad Amin Sabeti, Shahram Kheyrian, Mahnaz Alavi Darazam, Ilad |
author_sort | Hatami, Firouze |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: RT‐PCR is widely used as a diagnostic test for the detection of SARS‐CoV‐2. In this study, we aim to describe the clinical utility of serial PCR testing in the final detection of COVID‐19. METHOD: We collected multiple nasopharyngeal swab samples from patients who had negative RT‐PCR test on the first day after hospitalization. RT‐PCR tests were performed on the second day for all patients with initial negative result. For the patients with secondary negative results on day 2, tertiary RT‐PCR tests were performed on day 3 after hospitalization. RESULT: Among 68 patients with initial negative test results, at the end of follow‐up, the mortality number was 20 (29.4%). About 33.8% of patients had subsequent positive PCR test results for the second time and 17.4% of the patients who performed third PCR test had positive result. CONCLUSION: Based on this study, serial RT‐PCR testing is unlikely to yield additional information. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8842140 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88421402022-02-22 One‐step and sequential SARSCOV‐2 polymerase chain reaction tests would not work every time Hatami, Firouze Rabiei, Mohammad Mahdi Javandoust Gharehbagh, Farid Pourhoseingholi, Mohamad Amin Sabeti, Shahram Kheyrian, Mahnaz Alavi Darazam, Ilad J Clin Lab Anal Research Articles INTRODUCTION: RT‐PCR is widely used as a diagnostic test for the detection of SARS‐CoV‐2. In this study, we aim to describe the clinical utility of serial PCR testing in the final detection of COVID‐19. METHOD: We collected multiple nasopharyngeal swab samples from patients who had negative RT‐PCR test on the first day after hospitalization. RT‐PCR tests were performed on the second day for all patients with initial negative result. For the patients with secondary negative results on day 2, tertiary RT‐PCR tests were performed on day 3 after hospitalization. RESULT: Among 68 patients with initial negative test results, at the end of follow‐up, the mortality number was 20 (29.4%). About 33.8% of patients had subsequent positive PCR test results for the second time and 17.4% of the patients who performed third PCR test had positive result. CONCLUSION: Based on this study, serial RT‐PCR testing is unlikely to yield additional information. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-01-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8842140/ /pubmed/34997789 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcla.24226 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Articles Hatami, Firouze Rabiei, Mohammad Mahdi Javandoust Gharehbagh, Farid Pourhoseingholi, Mohamad Amin Sabeti, Shahram Kheyrian, Mahnaz Alavi Darazam, Ilad One‐step and sequential SARSCOV‐2 polymerase chain reaction tests would not work every time |
title | One‐step and sequential SARSCOV‐2 polymerase chain reaction tests would not work every time |
title_full | One‐step and sequential SARSCOV‐2 polymerase chain reaction tests would not work every time |
title_fullStr | One‐step and sequential SARSCOV‐2 polymerase chain reaction tests would not work every time |
title_full_unstemmed | One‐step and sequential SARSCOV‐2 polymerase chain reaction tests would not work every time |
title_short | One‐step and sequential SARSCOV‐2 polymerase chain reaction tests would not work every time |
title_sort | one‐step and sequential sarscov‐2 polymerase chain reaction tests would not work every time |
topic | Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8842140/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34997789 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcla.24226 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hatamifirouze onestepandsequentialsarscov2polymerasechainreactiontestswouldnotworkeverytime AT rabieimohammadmahdi onestepandsequentialsarscov2polymerasechainreactiontestswouldnotworkeverytime AT javandoustgharehbaghfarid onestepandsequentialsarscov2polymerasechainreactiontestswouldnotworkeverytime AT pourhoseingholimohamadamin onestepandsequentialsarscov2polymerasechainreactiontestswouldnotworkeverytime AT sabetishahram onestepandsequentialsarscov2polymerasechainreactiontestswouldnotworkeverytime AT kheyrianmahnaz onestepandsequentialsarscov2polymerasechainreactiontestswouldnotworkeverytime AT alavidarazamilad onestepandsequentialsarscov2polymerasechainreactiontestswouldnotworkeverytime |