Cargando…
Evaluating the Effects of Modified Windscreens on Organic Vapor Monitor Performance
Passive sampling using diffusive samplers has become popular as a convenient means of occupational compliance sampling for volatile organic compounds (VOCs). However, diffusive samplers possess sensitivity limitations when sampling low concentrations and for short durations. To reduce these limitati...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8842150/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35173446 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/11786302221078430 |
_version_ | 1784650993520082944 |
---|---|
author | Jones, Savannah R Shedd, Jacob S Oh, Jonghwa Lungu, Claudiu T |
author_facet | Jones, Savannah R Shedd, Jacob S Oh, Jonghwa Lungu, Claudiu T |
author_sort | Jones, Savannah R |
collection | PubMed |
description | Passive sampling using diffusive samplers has become popular as a convenient means of occupational compliance sampling for volatile organic compounds (VOCs). However, diffusive samplers possess sensitivity limitations when sampling low concentrations and for short durations. To reduce these limitations, our research team has been developing a novel method of sample recovery called photothermal desorption (PTD), which uses high energy visible light pulses to desorb analytes from sampling media. Newly designed passive samplers that will use PTD will be equipped with windscreens in a similar design with the 3M OVM. In a preliminary design effort, the present work sought to find a suitable, windscreen for future use in a PTD-compatible diffusive sampler prototype that would be similar to those found in commercially available diffusive samplers. To do so, 2 stainless steel windscreens (wire diameters 0.015″ and 0.0055″ respectively) were compared to a standard windscreen by exposing modified (ie, steel mesh installed) and non-modified 3M OVM samplers to 3 analytes. To mimic in-field conditions, each sampler was exposed to analyte concentrations at their short-term and personal exposure limits (STELs and PELs). From these comparisons, it was determined that the 0.0055″ mesh was most similar to the standard windscreen in contributing to sample collection based on the uptake and concentration determinations for each analyte and concentration. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8842150 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88421502022-02-15 Evaluating the Effects of Modified Windscreens on Organic Vapor Monitor Performance Jones, Savannah R Shedd, Jacob S Oh, Jonghwa Lungu, Claudiu T Environ Health Insights Original Research Passive sampling using diffusive samplers has become popular as a convenient means of occupational compliance sampling for volatile organic compounds (VOCs). However, diffusive samplers possess sensitivity limitations when sampling low concentrations and for short durations. To reduce these limitations, our research team has been developing a novel method of sample recovery called photothermal desorption (PTD), which uses high energy visible light pulses to desorb analytes from sampling media. Newly designed passive samplers that will use PTD will be equipped with windscreens in a similar design with the 3M OVM. In a preliminary design effort, the present work sought to find a suitable, windscreen for future use in a PTD-compatible diffusive sampler prototype that would be similar to those found in commercially available diffusive samplers. To do so, 2 stainless steel windscreens (wire diameters 0.015″ and 0.0055″ respectively) were compared to a standard windscreen by exposing modified (ie, steel mesh installed) and non-modified 3M OVM samplers to 3 analytes. To mimic in-field conditions, each sampler was exposed to analyte concentrations at their short-term and personal exposure limits (STELs and PELs). From these comparisons, it was determined that the 0.0055″ mesh was most similar to the standard windscreen in contributing to sample collection based on the uptake and concentration determinations for each analyte and concentration. SAGE Publications 2022-02-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8842150/ /pubmed/35173446 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/11786302221078430 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Jones, Savannah R Shedd, Jacob S Oh, Jonghwa Lungu, Claudiu T Evaluating the Effects of Modified Windscreens on Organic Vapor Monitor Performance |
title | Evaluating the Effects of Modified Windscreens on Organic Vapor
Monitor Performance |
title_full | Evaluating the Effects of Modified Windscreens on Organic Vapor
Monitor Performance |
title_fullStr | Evaluating the Effects of Modified Windscreens on Organic Vapor
Monitor Performance |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluating the Effects of Modified Windscreens on Organic Vapor
Monitor Performance |
title_short | Evaluating the Effects of Modified Windscreens on Organic Vapor
Monitor Performance |
title_sort | evaluating the effects of modified windscreens on organic vapor
monitor performance |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8842150/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35173446 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/11786302221078430 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jonessavannahr evaluatingtheeffectsofmodifiedwindscreensonorganicvapormonitorperformance AT sheddjacobs evaluatingtheeffectsofmodifiedwindscreensonorganicvapormonitorperformance AT ohjonghwa evaluatingtheeffectsofmodifiedwindscreensonorganicvapormonitorperformance AT lunguclaudiut evaluatingtheeffectsofmodifiedwindscreensonorganicvapormonitorperformance |