Cargando…

Dense fine speckled immunofluorescence pattern in a Chinese population: Prevalence and clinical association

OBJECTIVE: To provide information on the prevalence and possible clinical association in a Chinese population for medical practice of the dense fine speckled pattern (DFS pattern). METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted with patients who had the DFS pattern from June 2018 to December 2019 in W...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Keyi, Su, Zhenzhen, Hu, Jing, Huang, Zhuochun, Hu, Chaojun, Yang, Bin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8842166/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34952992
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcla.24173
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: To provide information on the prevalence and possible clinical association in a Chinese population for medical practice of the dense fine speckled pattern (DFS pattern). METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted with patients who had the DFS pattern from June 2018 to December 2019 in West China Hospital. RESULTS: A total of 469 patients (1.27% of patients with positive anti‐nuclear antibody indirect immunofluorescence (ANA IIF) test results) revealed the DFS pattern, of which 92.96% had isolated DFS pattern and 23.67% had titers above/equal to 1:320. The average age of patients with the DFS pattern was 43.45 years, and females accounted for 76.97% of them. Ten different kinds of diseases made up the vast majority of the disease spectrum, in which inflammatory or infectious diseases (46.11%), mental diseases (21.45%), and systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARDs) (18.23%) ranked in the top three. The most common SARDs were rheumatoid arthritis (RA), undifferentiated connective tissue disease (UCTD), and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Forty‐six patients (10.55%) had positive or suspicious extractable nuclear antigen (ENA) antibodies test results and a higher risk of suffering from SARDs. Forty‐seven patients would be missed if the DFS pattern with negative ENA antibodies test result was considered as exclusion criterion of SARDs. CONCLUSIONS: The DFS pattern is basically isolated and with low titer. It is unwise to exclude the diagnosis of SARDs only depending on the appearance of the DFS pattern. Autoimmune diseases‐related antibodies, clinical information of patients, and long‐term follow‐up are of great importance to avoid missed or delayed diagnosis of SARDs.