Cargando…

Risk factors for wound dehiscence following radical cystectomy: a prediction model

OBJECTIVES: Radical cystectomy (RC) is a complex urologic procedure performed for the treatment of bladder cancer and causes significant morbidity. Wound dehiscence (WD) is a major complication associated with RC and is associated with multiple risk factors. The objectives of this study are to ident...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nasrallah, Ali A., Mansour, Mazen, Abou Heidar, Nassib F., Ayoub, Christian, Najdi, Jad A., Tamim, Hani, El Hajj, Albert
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8842309/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35173813
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17562872211060570
_version_ 1784651023960244224
author Nasrallah, Ali A.
Mansour, Mazen
Abou Heidar, Nassib F.
Ayoub, Christian
Najdi, Jad A.
Tamim, Hani
El Hajj, Albert
author_facet Nasrallah, Ali A.
Mansour, Mazen
Abou Heidar, Nassib F.
Ayoub, Christian
Najdi, Jad A.
Tamim, Hani
El Hajj, Albert
author_sort Nasrallah, Ali A.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Radical cystectomy (RC) is a complex urologic procedure performed for the treatment of bladder cancer and causes significant morbidity. Wound dehiscence (WD) is a major complication associated with RC and is associated with multiple risk factors. The objectives of this study are to identify clinical risk factors for incidence of WD and develop a risk-prediction model to aid in patient risk-stratification and improvement of perioperative care. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The American College of Surgeons – National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database was used to derive the study cohort. A univariate analysis provided nine variables eligible for multivariate model entry. A stepwise logistic regression analysis was conducted and refined considering clinical relevance of the variables, and then bootstrapped with 1000 samples, resulting in a five-factor model. Model performance and calibration were assessed by a receiver operated curve (ROC) analysis and the Hosmer–Lemeshow test for goodness of fit, respectively. RESULTS: A cohort of 11,703 patients was identified from years 2005 to 2017, with 342 (2.8%) incidences of WD within 30 days of operation. The final five-factor model included male gender [odds ratio (OR) = 2.5, p < 0.001], surgical site infection (OR = 6.3, p < 0.001), smoking (OR = 1.8, p < 0.001), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (OR = 1.9, p < 0.001), and weight class; morbidly obese patients had triple the odds of WD (OR = 2.9, p < 0.001). The ROC analysis provided a C-statistic of 0.76 and calibration R(2) was 0.99. CONCLUSION: The study yields a statistically robust and clinically beneficial five-factor model for estimation of WD incidence risk following RC, with good performance and excellent calibration. These factors may assist in identifying high-risk patients, providing preoperative counseling and thus leading to improvement in perioperative care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8842309
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88423092022-02-15 Risk factors for wound dehiscence following radical cystectomy: a prediction model Nasrallah, Ali A. Mansour, Mazen Abou Heidar, Nassib F. Ayoub, Christian Najdi, Jad A. Tamim, Hani El Hajj, Albert Ther Adv Urol Original Research OBJECTIVES: Radical cystectomy (RC) is a complex urologic procedure performed for the treatment of bladder cancer and causes significant morbidity. Wound dehiscence (WD) is a major complication associated with RC and is associated with multiple risk factors. The objectives of this study are to identify clinical risk factors for incidence of WD and develop a risk-prediction model to aid in patient risk-stratification and improvement of perioperative care. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The American College of Surgeons – National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database was used to derive the study cohort. A univariate analysis provided nine variables eligible for multivariate model entry. A stepwise logistic regression analysis was conducted and refined considering clinical relevance of the variables, and then bootstrapped with 1000 samples, resulting in a five-factor model. Model performance and calibration were assessed by a receiver operated curve (ROC) analysis and the Hosmer–Lemeshow test for goodness of fit, respectively. RESULTS: A cohort of 11,703 patients was identified from years 2005 to 2017, with 342 (2.8%) incidences of WD within 30 days of operation. The final five-factor model included male gender [odds ratio (OR) = 2.5, p < 0.001], surgical site infection (OR = 6.3, p < 0.001), smoking (OR = 1.8, p < 0.001), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (OR = 1.9, p < 0.001), and weight class; morbidly obese patients had triple the odds of WD (OR = 2.9, p < 0.001). The ROC analysis provided a C-statistic of 0.76 and calibration R(2) was 0.99. CONCLUSION: The study yields a statistically robust and clinically beneficial five-factor model for estimation of WD incidence risk following RC, with good performance and excellent calibration. These factors may assist in identifying high-risk patients, providing preoperative counseling and thus leading to improvement in perioperative care. SAGE Publications 2021-12-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8842309/ /pubmed/35173813 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17562872211060570 Text en © The Author(s), 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Research
Nasrallah, Ali A.
Mansour, Mazen
Abou Heidar, Nassib F.
Ayoub, Christian
Najdi, Jad A.
Tamim, Hani
El Hajj, Albert
Risk factors for wound dehiscence following radical cystectomy: a prediction model
title Risk factors for wound dehiscence following radical cystectomy: a prediction model
title_full Risk factors for wound dehiscence following radical cystectomy: a prediction model
title_fullStr Risk factors for wound dehiscence following radical cystectomy: a prediction model
title_full_unstemmed Risk factors for wound dehiscence following radical cystectomy: a prediction model
title_short Risk factors for wound dehiscence following radical cystectomy: a prediction model
title_sort risk factors for wound dehiscence following radical cystectomy: a prediction model
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8842309/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35173813
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17562872211060570
work_keys_str_mv AT nasrallahalia riskfactorsforwounddehiscencefollowingradicalcystectomyapredictionmodel
AT mansourmazen riskfactorsforwounddehiscencefollowingradicalcystectomyapredictionmodel
AT abouheidarnassibf riskfactorsforwounddehiscencefollowingradicalcystectomyapredictionmodel
AT ayoubchristian riskfactorsforwounddehiscencefollowingradicalcystectomyapredictionmodel
AT najdijada riskfactorsforwounddehiscencefollowingradicalcystectomyapredictionmodel
AT tamimhani riskfactorsforwounddehiscencefollowingradicalcystectomyapredictionmodel
AT elhajjalbert riskfactorsforwounddehiscencefollowingradicalcystectomyapredictionmodel