Cargando…

Evaluating the Prognostic Accuracy of Biomarkers for Glioblastoma Multiforme Using The Cancer Genome Atlas Data

BACKGROUND: Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most common and aggressive primary brain tumor. Previous studies on GBM biomarkers focused on the effect of the biomarkers on overall survival (OS). Until now, no study has been published that evaluates the performance of biomarkers for prognosing OS....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hu, Nan, Cheng, Haojie, Zhang, Kevin, Jensen, Randy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8842453/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35173406
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1176935117734844
_version_ 1784651053196640256
author Hu, Nan
Cheng, Haojie
Zhang, Kevin
Jensen, Randy
author_facet Hu, Nan
Cheng, Haojie
Zhang, Kevin
Jensen, Randy
author_sort Hu, Nan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most common and aggressive primary brain tumor. Previous studies on GBM biomarkers focused on the effect of the biomarkers on overall survival (OS). Until now, no study has been published that evaluates the performance of biomarkers for prognosing OS. We examined the performance of microRNAs, gene expressions, gene signatures, and methylation that were previously identified to be prognostic. In addition, we investigated whether using clinical risk factors in combination with biomarkers can improve the prognostic performance. METHODS: The Cancer Genome Atlas, which provides both biomarkers and OS information, was used in this study. The time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to evaluate the prognostic accuracy. RESULTS: For prognosis of OS by 2 years from diagnosis, the area under the ROC curve (AUC) of microRNAs, Mir21 and Mir222, was 0.550 and 0.625, respectively. When age was included in the risk prediction score of these biomarkers, the AUC increased to 0.719 and 0.701, respectively. The SAMSN1 gene expression attains an AUC of 0.563, and the “8-gene” signature identified by Bao achieves an AUC of 0.613. CONCLUSIONS: Although some biomarkers are significantly associated with OS, the ability of these biomarkers for prognosing OS events is limited. Incorporating clinical risk factors, such as age, can greatly improve the prognostic performance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8842453
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88424532022-02-15 Evaluating the Prognostic Accuracy of Biomarkers for Glioblastoma Multiforme Using The Cancer Genome Atlas Data Hu, Nan Cheng, Haojie Zhang, Kevin Jensen, Randy Cancer Inform Review BACKGROUND: Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most common and aggressive primary brain tumor. Previous studies on GBM biomarkers focused on the effect of the biomarkers on overall survival (OS). Until now, no study has been published that evaluates the performance of biomarkers for prognosing OS. We examined the performance of microRNAs, gene expressions, gene signatures, and methylation that were previously identified to be prognostic. In addition, we investigated whether using clinical risk factors in combination with biomarkers can improve the prognostic performance. METHODS: The Cancer Genome Atlas, which provides both biomarkers and OS information, was used in this study. The time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to evaluate the prognostic accuracy. RESULTS: For prognosis of OS by 2 years from diagnosis, the area under the ROC curve (AUC) of microRNAs, Mir21 and Mir222, was 0.550 and 0.625, respectively. When age was included in the risk prediction score of these biomarkers, the AUC increased to 0.719 and 0.701, respectively. The SAMSN1 gene expression attains an AUC of 0.563, and the “8-gene” signature identified by Bao achieves an AUC of 0.613. CONCLUSIONS: Although some biomarkers are significantly associated with OS, the ability of these biomarkers for prognosing OS events is limited. Incorporating clinical risk factors, such as age, can greatly improve the prognostic performance. SAGE Publications 2017-12-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8842453/ /pubmed/35173406 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1176935117734844 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Review
Hu, Nan
Cheng, Haojie
Zhang, Kevin
Jensen, Randy
Evaluating the Prognostic Accuracy of Biomarkers for Glioblastoma Multiforme Using The Cancer Genome Atlas Data
title Evaluating the Prognostic Accuracy of Biomarkers for Glioblastoma Multiforme Using The Cancer Genome Atlas Data
title_full Evaluating the Prognostic Accuracy of Biomarkers for Glioblastoma Multiforme Using The Cancer Genome Atlas Data
title_fullStr Evaluating the Prognostic Accuracy of Biomarkers for Glioblastoma Multiforme Using The Cancer Genome Atlas Data
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating the Prognostic Accuracy of Biomarkers for Glioblastoma Multiforme Using The Cancer Genome Atlas Data
title_short Evaluating the Prognostic Accuracy of Biomarkers for Glioblastoma Multiforme Using The Cancer Genome Atlas Data
title_sort evaluating the prognostic accuracy of biomarkers for glioblastoma multiforme using the cancer genome atlas data
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8842453/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35173406
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1176935117734844
work_keys_str_mv AT hunan evaluatingtheprognosticaccuracyofbiomarkersforglioblastomamultiformeusingthecancergenomeatlasdata
AT chenghaojie evaluatingtheprognosticaccuracyofbiomarkersforglioblastomamultiformeusingthecancergenomeatlasdata
AT zhangkevin evaluatingtheprognosticaccuracyofbiomarkersforglioblastomamultiformeusingthecancergenomeatlasdata
AT jensenrandy evaluatingtheprognosticaccuracyofbiomarkersforglioblastomamultiformeusingthecancergenomeatlasdata